Cited by 3,722Intensive Care Unit Cognitive DisordersAlcoholism and Thiamine DeficiencyDementia and Cognitive Impairment Research

Delirium in elderly people

Open access
Inouye, Sharon K, Westendorp, Rudi GJ, Saczynski, Jane S·2014·The Lancet

Abstract

Delirium is an acute disorder of attention and cognition in elderly people (ie, those aged 65 years or older) that is common, serious, costly, under-recognised, and often fatal. A formal cognitive assessment and history of acute onset of symptoms are necessary for diagnosis. In view of the complex multifactorial causes of delirium, multicomponent non-pharmacological risk factor approaches are the most effective strategy for prevention. No convincing evidence shows that pharmacological prevention or treatment is effective. Drug reduction for sedation and analgesia and non-pharmacological approaches are recommended. Delirium offers opportunities to elucidate brain pathophysiology--it serves both as a marker of brain vulnerability with decreased reserve and as a potential mechanism for permanent cognitive damage. As a potent indicator of patients' safety, delirium provides a target for system-wide process improvements. Public health priorities include improvements in coding, reimbursement from insurers, and research funding, and widespread education for clinicians and the public about the importance of delirium.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0140-6736(13)60688-1

Cites

118 of 118 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Inouye, S. K., Westendorp, R. G., & Saczynski, J. S.
Affiliations
  • Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center (US)
  • Leiden University Medical Center (NL)
  • University of Massachusetts Chan Medical School (US)
Corresponding author
Inouye, Sharon K
Venue
The Lancet
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2014-03
Volume
383
Issue
9920
Pages
911-922
ISSN
  • 0099-5355 (ISSN-L)
  • 0140-6736
OpenAlex
W2141710162
Cited by
3,722
References
118
Citations by year
2026: 354 · 2025: 397 · 2024: 376 · 2023: 328 · 2022: 385 · 2021: 386 · 2020: 340 · 2019: 307 · 2018: 237 · 2017: 213 · 2016: 184 · 2015: 131 · 2014: 67 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 3
FWCI
14.60
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • The Lancet (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
  • Digital Access to Scholarship at Harvard (DASH) (Harvard University) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
  • National Institute on Aging (P01AG031720)
  • US National Institutes of Health (K01AG033643 and U01HL10526)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine › Intensive Care Unit Cognitive Disorders
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Neurology › Alcoholism and Thiamine Deficiency
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
Keywords
delirium, older adults, cognitive impairment, delirium prevention, delirium risk factors, sedation reduction, non-pharmacological treatment, brain reserve, patient safety, clinician education
MeSH terms
Aged, Cognition Disorders, Delirium, Dementia, Humans, Prognosis, Risk Factors, Biomedical Research

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review