The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Breast Cancer Mortality After a Diagnosis of Ductal Carcinoma In Situ
Open accessAbstract
IMPORTANCE: Women with ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS), or stage 0 breast cancer, often experience a second primary breast cancer (DCIS or invasive), and some ultimately die of breast cancer. OBJECTIVE: To estimate the 10- and 20-year mortality from breast cancer following a diagnosis of DCIS and to establish whether the mortality rate is influenced by age at diagnosis, ethnicity, and initial treatment received. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: Observational study of women who received a diagnosis of DCIS from 1988 to 2011 in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) 18 registries database. Age at diagnosis, race/ethnicity, pathologic features, date of second primary breast cancer, cause of death, and survival were abstracted for 108,196 women. Their risk of dying of breast cancer was compared with that of women in the general population. Cox proportional hazards analysis was performed to estimate the hazard ratio (HR) for death from DCIS by age at diagnosis, clinical features, ethnicity, and treatment. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: Ten- and 20-year breast cancer-specific mortality. RESULTS: Among the 108 196 women with DCIS, the mean (range) age at diagnosis of DCIS was 53.8 (15-69) years and the mean (range) duration of follow-up was 7.5 (0-23.9) years. At 20 years, the breast cancer-specific mortality was 3.3% (95% CI, 3.0%-3.6%) overall and was higher for women who received a diagnosis before age 35 years compared with older women (7.8% vs 3.2%; HR, 2.58 [95% CI, 1.85-3.60]; P < .001) and for blacks compared with non-Hispanic whites (7.0% vs 3.0%; HR, 2.55 [95% CI, 2.17-3.01]; P < .001). The risk of dying of breast cancer increased after experience of an ipsilateral invasive breast cancer (HR, 18.1 [95% CI, 14.0-23.6]; P < .001). A total of 517 patients died of breast cancer following a DCIS diagnosis (mean follow-up, 7.5 [range, 0-23.9] years) without experiencing an in-breast invasive cancer prior to death. Among patients who received lumpectomy, radiotherapy was associated with a reduction in the risk of ipsilateral invasive recurrence at 10 years (2.5% vs 4.9%; adjusted HR, 0.47 [95% CI, 0.42-0.53]; P < .001) but not of breast cancer-specific mortality at 10 years (0.8% vs 0.9%; HR, 0.86 [95% CI, 0.67-1.10]; P = .22). CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: Important risk factors for death from breast cancer following a DCIS diagnosis include age at diagnosis and black ethnicity. The risk of death increases after a diagnosis of an ipsilateral second primary invasive breast cancer, but prevention of these recurrences by radiotherapy does not diminish breast cancer mortality at 10 years.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Fisher, B., Anderson, S., Bryant, J., Margolese, R. G., Deutsch, M., Fisher, E. R., Jeong, J.-H., & Wolmark, N. (2002) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmoa022152 · Cited by 6,249
Cited by
Screening for breast cancer: U.S. Preventive Services Task Force recommendation statement
Siu, A. L., & on behalf of the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force (2016) · Annals of Internal Medicine · doi:10.7326/m15-2886 · Cited by 2,094
Morrow, M., Van Zee, K. J., Solin, L. J., Houssami, N., Chavez-MacGregor, M., Harris, J. R., Horton, J., Hwang, S., Johnson, P. L., Marinovich, M. L., et al. (2016) · Journal of Clinical Oncology · doi:10.1200/jco.2016.68.3573 · Cited by 386
Yamamoto, A., Huang, Y., Krajina, B. A., McBirney, M., Doak, A. E., Qu, S., Wang, C. L., Haffner, M. C., & Cheung, K. J. (2023) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.2214888120 · Cited by 69
Khan, S. A., Mi, X., Xu, Y., Blanco, L. Z., Akasha, A. M., Pilewskie, M., Degnim, A. C., AlHilli, Z., Amin, A. L., Hwang, E. S., et al. (2023) · JAMA Surgery · doi:10.1001/jamasurg.2023.5113 · Cited by 9
Metadata
- Authors
- Narod, S. A., Iqbal, J., Giannakeas, V., Sopik, V., & Sun, P.
- Venue
- JAMA Oncology
- Publisher
- American Medical Association (AMA)
- Published
- 2015-10-01
- Volume
- 1
- Issue
- 7
- Pages
- 888
- ISSN
- 2374-2437 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2127644335
- Cited by
- 613
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 49.77
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Breast Cancer Mortality After a Diagnosis of Ductal Carcinoma In Situ. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1001/jamaoncol.2015.2510
- The paper
- Narod, S. A., Iqbal, J., Giannakeas, V., Sopik, V., & Sun, P. (2015). Breast Cancer Mortality After a Diagnosis of Ductal Carcinoma In Situ. JAMA Oncology. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamaoncol.2015.2510
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.