Cited by 264Pancreatic and Hepatic Oncology ResearchCancer Genomics and DiagnosticsCholangiocarcinoma and Gallbladder Cancer Studies

Association of Alterations in Main Driver Genes With Outcomes of Patients With Resected Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma

Open access
Qian, Zhi Rong, Rubinson, Douglas A., Nowak, Jonathan A., Morales-Oyarvide, Vicente, Dunne, Richard F., Kozak, Margaret M., Welch, Marisa W., Brais, Lauren K. +35 more·2018·JAMA Oncology

Abstract

IMPORTANCE: Although patients with resected pancreatic adenocarcinoma are at high risk for disease recurrence, few biomarkers are available to inform patient outcomes. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the alterations of the 4 main driver genes in pancreatic adenocarcinoma and patient outcomes after cancer resection. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: This study analyzed protein expression and DNA alterations for the KRAS, CDKN2A, SMAD4, and TP53 genes by immunohistochemistry and next-generation sequencing in formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded tumors in 356 patients with resected pancreatic adenocarcinoma who were treated at the Dana-Farber/Brigham and Women's Cancer Center (October 26, 2002, to May 21, 2012), University of Rochester Medical Center (March 1, 2006, to November 1, 2013), or Stanford Cancer Institute (September 26, 1995, to May 22, 2013). Associations of driver gene alterations with disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) were evaluated using Cox proportional hazards regression with estimation of hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% CIs and adjustment for age, sex, tumor characteristics, institution, and perioperative treatment. Data were collected September 9, 2012, to June 28, 2016, and analyzed December 17, 2016, to March 14, 2017. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: The DFS and OS among patients with resected pancreatic adenocarcinoma. RESULTS: Of the 356 patients studied, 191 (53.7%) were men and 165 (46.3%) were women, with a median (interquartile range [IQR]) age of 67 (59.0-73.5) years. Patients with KRAS mutant tumors had worse DFS (median [IQR], 12.3 [6.7 -27.2] months) and OS (20.3 [11.3-38.3] months) compared with patients with KRAS wild-type tumors (DFS, 16.2 [8.9-30.5] months; OS, 38.6 [16.6-63.1] months) and had 5-year OS of 13.0% vs 30.2%. Particularly poor outcomes were identified in patients with KRAS G12D-mutant tumors, who had a median (IQR) OS of 15.3 (9.8-32.7) months. Patients whose tumors lacked CDKN2A expression had worse DFS (median, 11.5 [IQR, 6.2-24.5] months) and OS (19.7 [10.9-37.1] months) compared with patients who had intact CDKN2A (DFS, 14.8 [8.2-30.5] months; OS, 24.6 [14.1-44.6] months). The molecular status of SMAD4 was not associated with DFS or OS, whereas TP53 status was associated only with shorter DFS (HR, 1.33; 95% CI, 1.02-1.75; P = .04). Patients had worse DFS and OS if they had a greater number of altered driver genes. Compared with patients with 0 to 2 altered genes, those with 4 altered genes had worse DFS (HR, 1.79 [95% CI, 1.24-2.59; P = .002]) and OS (HR, 1.38 [95% CI, 0.98-1.94; P = .06]). Five-year OS was 18.4% for patients with 0 to 2 gene alterations, 14.1% for those with 3 alterations, and 8.2% for those with 4 alterations. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: Patient outcomes are associated with alterations of the 4 main driver genes in resected pancreatic adenocarcinoma.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1001/jamaoncol.2017.3420

Cites

15 of 15 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • A previous study of 356 patients with resected PDAC reported that those with KRAS mutations had worse disease-free survival (median 12.3 months) and OS (median 20.3 months) compared with those with wildtype KRAS (DFS 16.2 months and OS 38.6 months), and particularly poor outcomes were observed in patients with KRASG12D mutation (median OS 15.3 months).

    “This is consistent with a previous study of 356 patients with resected PDAC, which reported that those with KRAS mutations had worse disease-free survival (DFS) (median 12.3 months) and OS (median 20.3 months) compared with those with wildtype KRAS (DFS 16.2 months and OS 38.6 months), and particularly poor outcomes were observed in patients with KRASG12D mutation (median OS 15.3 months)39.”
  • Patients with resected PDAC and somatic CDKN2A loss had worse survival (median DFS 11.5 and OS 19.7) compared to patients with wildtype CDKN2A (median DFS 14.8 and median OS 24.6).

    “Patients with resected PDAC and somatic CDKN2A loss had worse survival (median DFS 11.5 and OS 19.7) compared to patients with wildtype CDKN2A (median DFS 14.8 and median OS 24.6)39.”
  • Reported results about the prognostic value of SMAD4 have been inconsistent.

    “SMAD4 is a tumor suppressor gene, and reported results about the prognostic value of SMAD4 have been inconsistent39,60–62.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Qian, Z. R., Rubinson, D. A., Nowak, J. A., Morales-Oyarvide, V., Dunne, R. F., Kozak, M. M., Welch, M. W., Brais, L. K., Da Silva, A., Li, T., Li, W., Masuda, A., Yang, J., Shi, Y., Gu, M., Masugi, Y., Bui, J., Zellers, C. L., Yuan, C., Babic, A., Khalaf, N., Aguirre, A., Ng, K., Miksad, R. A., Bullock, A. J., Chang, D. T., Tseng, J. F., Clancy, T. E., Linehan, D. C., Findeis-Hosey, J. J., Doyle, L. A., Thorner, A. R., Ducar, M., Wollison, B., Laing, A., Hahn, W. C., Meyerson, M., Fuchs, C. S., Ogino, S., Hornick, J. L., Hezel, A. F., Koong, A. C., & Wolpin, B. M.
Affiliations
  • Harvard University (US)
  • Brigham and Women's Hospital (US)
  • Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
  • University of Rochester Medicine (US)
  • Stanford Cancer Institute (US)
  • Dana-Farber Cancer Institute (US)
  • Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center (US)
  • Broad Institute (US)
  • The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center (US)
Corresponding author
Wolpin, Brian M.
Venue
JAMA Oncology
Published
2018-03-08
Volume
4
Issue
3
Pages
e173420
ISSN
2374-2437 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2767007332
Cited by
260
References
15
Citations by year
2026: 17 · 2025: 31 · 2024: 38 · 2023: 47 · 2022: 49 · 2021: 28 · 2020: 24 · 2019: 19 · 2018: 7
FWCI
6.03
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • JAMA Oncology (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Pancreatic Cancer Action Network
  • National Institutes of Health (UL1TR001102, UL1TR001863)
  • National Cancer Institute (P50CA127003, R01CA124908, R35CA197735, K07CA148894, U01CA176058, U01CA199253, K08CA218420, U01CA210171)
  • National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Pancreatic and Hepatic Oncology Research
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cancer Research › Cancer Genomics and Diagnostics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Cholangiocarcinoma and Gallbladder Cancer Studies
Keywords
pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma, pancreatic cancer surgery, driver gene alterations, KRAS mutation, CDKN2A, SMAD4, TP53, disease-free survival, overall survival, prognostic factors, protein expression, DNA alterations, recurrence, postoperative adjuvant therapy, neoadjuvant therapy, tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes, tumor-infiltrating macrophages, tumor-infiltrating neutrophils, tumor-infiltrating T cells, tumor-infiltrating B cells, tumor-infiltrating plasma cells, tumor-infiltrating dendritic cells, tumor-infiltrating NK cells, tumor-infiltrating Treg cells, tumor-infiltrating myeloid cells
MeSH terms
Adenocarcinoma, Aged, DNA Mutational Analysis, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Humans, Immunohistochemistry, Male, Middle Aged, Mutation, Pancreatectomy, Pancreatic Neoplasms, Prognosis, Proto-Oncogene Proteins, Biomarkers, Tumor, Gene Expression Regulation, Neoplastic, Survival Analysis, Treatment Outcome, Gene Expression Profiling, Carcinoma, Pancreatic Ductal, High-Throughput Nucleotide Sequencing

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review