The DOI matches its Crossref record.
A 25-Year Experience of US Food and Drug Administration Accelerated Approval of Malignant Hematology and Oncology Drugs and Biologics: A Review
Abstract
Importance: Accelerated approval (AA) is a US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) expedited program intended to speed the approval of drugs and biologics that may demonstrate a meaningful advantage over available therapies for diseases that are serious or life-threatening. Observations: This review describes all malignant hematology and oncology AAs from inception of the program on December 11, 1992, to May 31, 2017. During this period, the FDA granted AA to 64 malignant hematology and oncology products for 93 new indications. Of these AAs, 53 were for new molecular entities. Overall, the end point of response rate, including hematologic response rates, accounted for most AAs (81 [87%]), followed by time-to-event end points of progression-free survival or time to progression (8 [9%]) and disease-free survival or recurrence-free survival (4 [4%]). Single-arm trial designs provided the data for 67 (72%) of the initial AA indications. Of the 93 AAs, 51 (55%) have fulfilled their postmarketing requirement and verified benefit in a median of 3.4 years after their initial AA. Thirty-seven (40%) indications have not yet completed confirmatory trial(s) or verified benefit, and 5 indications receiving AA (5%) have been withdrawn from the market. Conclusions and Relevance: The use of the AA program during the past 25 years has increased over time, and only a small portion of indications under the AA program fail to verify clinical benefit. For patients with serious or life-threatening oncologic diseases, AA brings products to the market years before confirmatory trials are typically completed.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Sacituzumab govitecan-hziy in refractory metastatic triple-negative breast cancer
Bardia, A., Mayer, I. A., Vahdat, L. T., Tolaney, S. M., Isakoff, S. J., Diamond, J. R., O’Shaughnessy, J., Moroose, R. L., Santin, A. D., Abramson, V. G., et al. (2019) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmoa1814213 · Cited by 874
Harnessing Real-World Evidence to Advance Cancer Research
Tang, M., Pearson, S.-A., Simes, R. J., & Chua, B. H. (2023) · Current Oncology · doi:10.3390/curroncol30020143 · Cited by 88
Tsung, I., Dolan, R., Lao, C. D., Fecher, L., Riggenbach, K., Yeboah‐Korang, A., & Fontana, R. J. (2019) · Alimentary Pharmacology & Therapeutics · doi:10.1111/apt.15413 · Cited by 86
Multiple deadlocks in the development of nonprofit drugs
Cvek, B. (2022) · Drug Discovery Today · doi:10.1016/j.drudis.2022.06.001 · Cited by 5
Metadata
- Authors
- Beaver, J. A., Howie, L. J., Pelosof, L., Kim, T., Liu, J., Goldberg, K. B., Sridhara, R., Blumenthal, G. M., Farrell, A. T., Keegan, P., Pazdur, R., & Kluetz, P. G.
- Venue
- JAMA Oncology
- Publisher
- American Medical Association (AMA)
- Published
- 2018-06-01
- Volume
- 4
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 849
- ISSN
- 2374-2437 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2793539832
- Cited by
- 298
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 48.90
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A 25-Year Experience of US Food and Drug Administration Accelerated Approval of Malignant Hematology and Oncology Drugs and Biologics: A Review. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1001/jamaoncol.2017.5618
- The paper
- Beaver, J. A., Howie, L. J., Pelosof, L., Kim, T., Liu, J., Goldberg, K. B., Sridhara, R., Blumenthal, G. M., Farrell, A. T., Keegan, P., Pazdur, R., & Kluetz, P. G. (2018). A 25-Year Experience of US Food and Drug Administration Accelerated Approval of Malignant Hematology and Oncology Drugs and Biologics: A Review. JAMA Oncology. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamaoncol.2017.5618
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.