Cited by 352Cancer Immunotherapy and BiomarkersCutaneous Melanoma Detection and ManagementMelanoma and MAPK Pathways

Survival Outcomes in Patients With Previously Untreated BRAF Wild-Type Advanced Melanoma Treated With Nivolumab Therapy: Three-Year Follow-up of a Randomized Phase 3 Trial

Open access
Ascierto, Paolo A., Long, Georgina V., Robert, Caroline, Brady, Benjamin, Dutriaux, Caroline, Di Giacomo, Anna Maria, Mortier, Laurent, Hassel, Jessica C. +20 more·2019·JAMA Oncology

Abstract

Importance: This analysis provides long-term follow-up in patients with BRAF wild-type advanced melanoma receiving first-line therapy based on anti-programmed cell death 1 receptor inhibitors. Objective: To compare the 3-year survival with nivolumab vs that with dacarbazine in patients with previously untreated BRAF wild-type advanced melanoma. Design, Setting, and Participants: This follow-up of a randomized phase 3 trial analyzed 3-year overall survival data from the randomized, controlled, double-blind CheckMate 066 phase 3 clinical trial. For this ongoing, multicenter academic institution trial, patients were enrolled from January 2013 through February 2014. Eligible patients were 18 years or older with confirmed unresectable previously untreated stage III or IV melanoma and an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0 or 1 but without a BRAF mutation. Interventions: Patients were treated until progression or unacceptable toxic events with nivolumab (3 mg/kg every 2 weeks plus dacarbazine-matched placebo every 3 weeks) or dacarbazine (1000 mg/m2 every 3 weeks plus nivolumab-matched placebo every 2 weeks). Main Outcome and Measure: Overall survival. Results: At minimum follow-ups of 38.4 months among 210 participants in the nivolumab group (median age, 64 years [range, 18-86 years]; 57.6% male) and 38.5 months among 208 participants in the dacarbazine group (median age, 66 years [range, 25-87 years]; 60.1% male), 3-year overall survival rates were 51.2% (95% CI, 44.1%-57.9%) and 21.6% (95% CI, 16.1%-27.6%), respectively. The median overall survival was 37.5 months (95% CI, 25.5 months-not reached) in the nivolumab group and 11.2 months (95% CI, 9.6-13.0 months) in the dacarbazine group (hazard ratio, 0.46; 95% CI, 0.36-0.59; P < .001). Complete and partial responses, respectively, were reported for 19.0% (40 of 210) and 23.8% (50 of 210) of patients in the nivolumab group compared with 1.4% (3 of 208) and 13.0% (27 of 208) of patients in the dacarbazine group. Additional analyses were performed on outcomes with subsequent therapies. Treatment-related grade 3/4 adverse events occurred in 15.0% (31 of 206) of nivolumab-treated patients and in 17.6% (36 of 205) of dacarbazine-treated patients. There were no deaths due to study drug toxic effects. Conclusions and Relevance: Nivolumab led to improved 3-year overall survival vs dacarbazine in patients with previously untreated BRAF wild-type advanced melanoma. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT01721772.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1001/jamaoncol.2018.4514

Cites

20 of 20 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Ascierto, P. A., Long, G. V., Robert, C., Brady, B., Dutriaux, C., Di Giacomo, A. M., Mortier, L., Hassel, J. C., Rutkowski, P., McNeil, C., Kalinka-Warzocha, E., Savage, K. J., Hernberg, M. M., Lebbé, C., Charles, J., Mihalcioiu, C., Chiarion-Sileni, V., Mauch, C., Cognetti, F., Ny, L., Arance, A., Svane, I. M., Schadendorf, D., Gogas, H., Saci, A., Jiang, J., Rizzo, J., & Atkinson, V.
Affiliations
  • Istituto Nazionale Tumori IRCCS "Fondazione G. Pascale" (IT)
  • The University of Sydney (AU)
  • Institut Gustave Roussy (FR)
  • Cabrini Hospital (AU)
  • Université de Bordeaux (FR)
  • UOC Oncological Immunotherapy, University Hospital of Siena, Istituto Toscano Tumori, Siena, Italy
  • Inserm (FR)
  • Heidelberg University (DE)
  • The Maria Sklodowska-Curie National Research Institute of Oncology (PL)
  • Royal Prince Alfred Hospital (AU)
  • Polish Mother’s Memorial Hospital Research Institute, Lodz, Poland
  • BC Cancer Agency (CA)
  • Helsinki University Hospital (FI)
  • Assistance Publique–Hôpitaux de Paris Dermatology and Centre d’Investigation Clinique, University Paris Diderot INSERM U976, Saint Louis Hospital, Paris, France
  • Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (FR)
  • McGill University (CA)
  • Melanoma Cancer Unit, Istituto Oncologico Veneto, Istituto di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico, Padua, Italy
  • University Hospital Cologne (DE)
  • Instituto Nazionale Tumori Regina Elena (IT)
  • Sahlgrenska University Hospital (SE)
  • Hospital Clínic de Barcelona (ES)
  • Herlev Hospital (DK)
  • Essen University Hospital (DE)
  • National and Kapodistrian University of Athens (GR)
  • Bristol-Myers Squibb (United States) (US)
  • The University of Queensland (AU)
Corresponding author
Ascierto, Paolo A.
Venue
JAMA Oncology
Published
2019-02-01
Volume
5
Issue
2
Pages
187
ISSN
2374-2437 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2898510820
Cited by
352
References
20
Citations by year
2026: 18 · 2025: 26 · 2024: 31 · 2023: 46 · 2022: 47 · 2021: 65 · 2020: 83 · 2019: 33 · 2018: 2 · 2012: 1
FWCI
17.20
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • JAMA Oncology (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Research at the University of Copenhagen (University of Copenhagen) (publishedVersion, other-oa)
  • Universitätsbibliographie, Universität Duisburg-Essen (submittedVersion)
  • IRIS Research product catalog (Sapienza University of Rome) (submittedVersion)
  • Use Siena air (University of Siena) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Cancer Immunotherapy and Biomarkers
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Cutaneous Melanoma Detection and Management
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Melanoma and MAPK Pathways
Keywords
BRAF wild-type melanoma, advanced melanoma, nivolumab, dacarbazine, immune checkpoint inhibitors, PD-1 inhibitors, first-line therapy, overall survival, long-term follow-up, complete response, partial response, treatment-related adverse events, immunotherapy, progression-free survival, treatment discontinuation
MeSH terms
Antineoplastic Agents, Immunological, Nivolumab, Adolescent, Adult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Dacarbazine, Double-Blind Method, Female, Humans, Male, Melanoma, Middle Aged, Skin Neoplasms, Time Factors, Treatment Outcome, Disease Progression, Antineoplastic Agents, Alkylating, Proto-Oncogene Proteins B-raf, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review