Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 304

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 38 of the 38 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Comparison of Universal Genetic Testing vs Guideline-Directed Targeted Testing for Patients With Hereditary Cancer Syndrome

Open access
Samadder, N. Jewel, Riegert-Johnson, Douglas, Boardman, Lisa, Rhodes, Deborah, Wick, Myra, Okuno, Scott, Kunze, Katie L., Golafshar, Michael, Uson, Pedro L. S., Mountjoy, Luke, Ertz-Archambault, Natalie, Patel, Neej, Rodriguez, Eduardo A., Lizaola-Mayo, Blanca, Lehrer, Michael, Thorpe, Cameron S., Yu, Nathan Y., Esplin, Edward D., Nussbaum, Robert L., Sharp, Richard R., Azevedo, Cindy, Klint, Margaret, Hager, Megan, Macklin-Mantia, Sarah, Bryce, Alan H., Bekaii-Saab, Tanios S., Sekulic, Aleksandar, Stewart, A. Keith·2021·JAMA Oncology

Abstract

IMPORTANCE: Hereditary factors play a key role in the risk of developing several cancers. Identification of a germline predisposition can have important implications for treatment decisions, risk-reducing interventions, cancer screening, and germline testing. OBJECTIVE: To examine the prevalence of pathogenic germline variants (PGVs) in patients with cancer using a universal testing approach compared with targeted testing based on clinical guidelines and the uptake of cascade family variant testing (FVT). DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: This prospective, multicenter cohort study assessed germline genetic alterations among patients with solid tumor cancer receiving care at Mayo Clinic cancer centers and a community practice between April 1, 2018, and March 31, 2020. Patients were not selected based on cancer type, disease stage, family history of cancer, ethnicity, or age. EXPOSURES: Germline sequencing using a greater than 80-gene next-generation sequencing platform. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: Proportion of PGVs detected with a universal strategy compared with a guideline-directed approach and uptake of cascade FVT in families. RESULTS: A total of 2984 patients (mean [SD] age, 61.4 [12.2] years; 1582 [53.0%] male) were studied. Pathogenic germline variants were found in 397 patients (13.3%), including 282 moderate- and high-penetrance cancer susceptibility genes. Variants of uncertain significance were found in 1415 patients (47.4%). A total of 192 patients (6.4%) had incremental clinically actionable findings that would not have been detected by phenotype or family history-based testing criteria. Of those with a high-penetrance PGV, 42 patients (28.2%) had modifications in their treatment based on the finding. Only younger age of diagnosis was associated with presence of PGV. Only 70 patients (17.6%) with PGVs had family members undergoing no-cost cascade FVT. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: This prospective, multicenter cohort study found that universal multigene panel testing among patients with solid tumor cancer was associated with an increased detection of heritable variants over the predicted yield of targeted testing based on guidelines. Nearly 30% of patients with high-penetrance variants had modifications in their treatment. Uptake of cascade FVT was low despite being offered at no cost.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1001/jamaoncol.2020.6252

Cites

38 of 38 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 38 references

Metadata

Authors
Samadder, N. J., Riegert-Johnson, D., Boardman, L., Rhodes, D., Wick, M., Okuno, S., Kunze, K. L., Golafshar, M., Uson, P. L. S., Mountjoy, L., Ertz-Archambault, N., Patel, N., Rodriguez, E. A., Lizaola-Mayo, B., Lehrer, M., Thorpe, C. S., Yu, N. Y., Esplin, E. D., Nussbaum, R. L., Sharp, R. R., Azevedo, C., Klint, M., Hager, M., Macklin-Mantia, S., Bryce, A. H., Bekaii-Saab, T. S., Sekulic, A., & Stewart, A. K.
Venue
JAMA Oncology
Published
2021-02-01
Volume
7
Issue
2
Pages
230
ISSN
2374-2437 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3095016275
Cited by
304
References
38
FWCI
19.23
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Comparison of Universal Genetic Testing vs Guideline-Directed Targeted Testing for Patients With Hereditary Cancer Syndrome. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1001/jamaoncol.2020.6252
The paper
Samadder, N. J., Riegert-Johnson, D., Boardman, L., Rhodes, D., Wick, M., Okuno, S., Kunze, K. L., Golafshar, M., Uson, P. L. S., Mountjoy, L., Ertz-Archambault, N., Patel, N., Rodriguez, E. A., Lizaola-Mayo, B., Lehrer, M., Thorpe, C. S., Yu, N. Y., Esplin, E. D., Nussbaum, R. L., . . . Stewart, A. K. (2021). Comparison of Universal Genetic Testing vs Guideline-Directed Targeted Testing for Patients With Hereditary Cancer Syndrome. JAMA Oncology. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamaoncol.2020.6252

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.