The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Cancer Susceptibility Gene Mutations in Individuals With Colorectal Cancer
Open accessAbstract
Purpose: Hereditary factors play an important role in colorectal cancer (CRC) risk, yet the prevalence of germline cancer susceptibility gene mutations in patients with CRC unselected for high-risk features (eg, early age at diagnosis, personal/family history of cancer or polyps, tumor microsatellite instability [MSI], mismatch repair [MMR] deficiency) is unknown. Patients and Methods: We recruited 1,058 participants who received CRC care in a clinic-based setting without preselection for age at diagnosis, personal/family history, or MSI/MMR results. All participants underwent germline testing for mutations in 25 genes associated with inherited cancer risk. Each gene was categorized as high penetrance or moderate penetrance on the basis of published estimates of the lifetime cancer risks conferred by pathogenic germline mutations in that gene. Results: One hundred five (9.9%; 95% CI, 8.2% to 11.9%) of 1,058 participants carried one or more pathogenic mutations, including 33 (3.1%) with Lynch syndrome (LS). Twenty-eight (96.6%) of 29 available LS CRCs demonstrated abnormal MSI/MMR results. Seventy-four (7.0%) of 1,058 participants carried non-LS gene mutations, including 23 (2.2%) with mutations in high-penetrance genes (five APC, three biallelic MUTYH, 11 BRCA1/2, two PALB2, one CDKN2A, and one TP53), 15 of whom lacked clinical histories suggestive of their underlying mutation. Thirty-eight (3.6%) participants had moderate-penetrance CRC risk gene mutations (19 monoallelic MUTYH, 17 APC*I1307K, two CHEK2). Neither proband age at CRC diagnosis, family history of CRC, nor personal history of other cancers significantly predicted the presence of pathogenic mutations in non-LS genes. Conclusion: Germline cancer susceptibility gene mutations are carried by 9.9% of patients with CRC. MSI/MMR testing reliably identifies LS probands, although 7.0% of patients with CRC carry non-LS mutations, including 1.0% with BRCA1/2 mutations.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
PD-1 Blockade in Tumors with Mismatch-Repair Deficiency
Le, D. T., Uram, J. N., Wang, H., Bartlett, B. R., Kemberling, H., Eyring, A. D., Skora, A. D., Luber, B. S., Azad, N. S., Laheru, D., et al. (2015) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmoa1500596 · Cited by 9,377
Screening for Colorectal Cancer: US Preventive Services Task Force Recommendation Statement
US Preventive Services Task Force, Bibbins-Domingo, K., Grossman, D. C., Curry, S. J., Davidson, K. W., Epling, J. W., García, F. A. R., Gillman, M. W., Harper, D. M., Kemper, A. R., et al. (2016) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.2016.5989 · Cited by 2,509
DNA-Repair Defects and Olaparib in Metastatic Prostate Cancer
Mateo, J., Carreira, S., Sandhu, S., Miranda, S., Mossop, H., Perez-Lopez, R., Nava Rodrigues, D., Robinson, D., Omlin, A., Tunariu, N., et al. (2015) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmoa1506859 · Cited by 2,185
Syngal, S., Brand, R. E., Church, J. M., Giardiello, F. M., Hampel, H. L., & Burt, R. W. (2015) · American Journal of Gastroenterology · doi:10.1038/ajg.2014.435 · Cited by 1,662
Self-citationJudkins, T., Leclair, B., Bowles, K., Gutin, N., Trost, J., McCulloch, J., Bhatnagar, S., Murray, A., Craft, J., Wardell, B., et al. (2015) · BMC Cancer · doi:10.1186/s12885-015-1224-y · Cited by 118
Cited by
Diagnosis and Treatment of Metastatic Colorectal Cancer: A Review
Biller, L. H., & Schrag, D. (2021) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.2021.0106 · Cited by 2,604
Self-citationPatel, S. G., Karlitz, J. J., Yen, T., Lieu, C. H., & Boland, C. R. (2022) · The Lancet Gastroenterology & Hepatology · doi:10.1016/s2468-1253(21)00426-x · Cited by 812
Colorectal Cancer Epidemiology: Recent Trends and Impact on Outcomes
Baidoun, F., Elshiwy, K., Elkeraie, Y., Merjaneh, Z., Khoudari, G., Sarmini, M. T., Gad, M., Al-Husseini, M., & Saad, A. (2021) · Current Drug Targets · doi:10.2174/1389450121999201117115717 · Cited by 523
Yang, X., Leslie, G., Doroszuk, A., Schneider, S., Allen, J., Decker, B., Dunning, A. M., Redman, J., Scarth, J., Plaskocinska, I., et al. (2020) · Journal of Clinical Oncology · doi:10.1200/jco.19.01907 · Cited by 432
NCCN Guidelines Insights: Genetic/Familial High-Risk Assessment: Colorectal, Version 2.2019
Gupta, S., Provenzale, D., Llor, X., Halverson, A. L., Grady, W., Chung, D. C., Haraldsdottir, S., Markowitz, A. J., Slavin Jr, T. P., Hampel, H., et al. (2019) · Journal of the National Comprehensive Cancer Network · doi:10.6004/jnccn.2019.0044 · Cited by 331
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Yurgelun, M. B., Kulke, M. H., Fuchs, C. S., Allen, B. A., Uno, H., Hornick, J. L., Ukaegbu, C. I., Brais, L. K., McNamara, P. G., Mayer, R. J., Schrag, D., Meyerhardt, J. A., Ng, K., Kidd, J., Singh, N., Hartman, A.-R., Wenstrup, R. J., & Syngal, S.
- Venue
- Journal of Clinical Oncology
- Published
- 2017-04-01
- Volume
- 35
- Issue
- 10
- Pages
- 1086-1095
- ISSN
- 0732-183X (ISSN-L)
- 1527-7755
- OpenAlex
- W2583869923
- Cited by
- 524
- References
- 5
- FWCI
- 31.34
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Cancer Susceptibility Gene Mutations in Individuals With Colorectal Cancer. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1200/jco.2016.71.0012
- The paper
- Yurgelun, M. B., Kulke, M. H., Fuchs, C. S., Allen, B. A., Uno, H., Hornick, J. L., Ukaegbu, C. I., Brais, L. K., McNamara, P. G., Mayer, R. J., Schrag, D., Meyerhardt, J. A., Ng, K., Kidd, J., Singh, N., Hartman, A.-R., Wenstrup, R. J., & Syngal, S. (2017). Cancer Susceptibility Gene Mutations in Individuals With Colorectal Cancer. Journal of Clinical Oncology. https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.2016.71.0012
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.