Cited by 147SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 ResearchCOVID-19 and healthcare impactsCOVID-19 Clinical Research Studies

Serologic Status and Toxic Effects of the SARS-CoV-2 BNT162b2 Vaccine in Patients Undergoing Treatment for Cancer

Open access
Goshen-Lago, Tal, Waldhorn, Ithai, Holland, Roy, Szwarcwort-Cohen, Moran, Reiner-Benaim, Anat, Shachor-Meyouhas, Yael, Hussein, Khetam, Fahoum, Liana +6 more·2021·JAMA Oncology

Abstract

Importance: The efficacy and safety profile of SARS-CoV-2 vaccines have been acquired from phase 3 studies; however, patients with cancer were not represented in these trials. Owing to the recommendation to prioritize high-risk populations for vaccination, further data are warranted. Objective: To evaluate the use and safety of the BNT162b2 vaccine in patients undergoing treatment for cancer. Design, Setting, and Participants: In January 2021, mass SARS-CoV-2 vaccination of high-risk populations, including patients with cancer, was initiated in Israel. This cohort study prospectively enrolled and followed up patients with cancer and healthy participants between January 15 and March 14, 2021. The study was conducted at the Division of Oncology of Rambam Health Care Campus, the major tertiary (referral) medical center of northern Israel. Participants included 232 patients with cancer who were receiving active treatment after the first and second doses of the BNT162b2 vaccine and 261 healthy, age-matched health care workers who served as controls. Exposures: Serum samples were collected after each vaccine dose and in cases of seronegativity. Questionnaires regarding sociodemographic characteristics and adverse reactions were administered at serum collection. A regulatory agencies-approved assay was used to assess IgG at all time points. Patients' electronic medical records were reviewed for documentation of COVID-19 infection and results of blood cell counts, liver enzyme levels, and imaging studies. Main Outcomes and Measures: Seroconversion rate after the first and second doses of the BNT162b2 vaccine and documented COVID-19 infection. Results: Of the 232 patients undergoing treatment for cancer, 132 were men (57%); mean (SD) age was 66 (12.09) years. After the first dose of BNT162b2 vaccine, 29% (n = 25) patients were seropositive compared with 84% (n = 220) of the controls (P < .001). After the second dose, the seropositive rate reached 86% (n = 187) in the patients. Testing rate ratios per 1000 person-days after the first dose were 12.5 (95% CI, 3.4-45.7) for the patients and 48.5 (95% CI, 37.2-63.2) for the controls. Patients undergoing chemotherapy showed reduced immunogenicity (odds ratio, 0.41; 95% CI, 0.17-0.98). In seronegative patients, the rate of documented absolute leukopenia reached 39%. No COVID-19 cases were documented throughout the study period; however, 2 cases in the patient cohort were noted immediately after the first dose. Reported adverse events were similar to data in former trials comprising mostly healthy individuals. Conclusions and Relevance: In this cohort study, the SARS-CoV-2 BNT162b2 vaccine appeared to be safe and achieve satisfactory serologic status in patients with cancer. There was a pronounced lag in antibody production compared with the rate in noncancer controls; however, seroconversion occurred in most patients after the second dose. Future real-world data are warranted to determine the long-term efficacy of the vaccine with regard to type of anticancer treatment.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1001/jamaoncol.2021.2675

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Participants with immunosuppression had consistently lower antibody responses, with neutralizing antibody titers five times lower than those without immunosuppression.

    “Similar to the findings in other reports,17-19 a significantly lower antibody response was found consistently through the observation period among participants with immunosuppression, who had neutralizing antibody titers that were lower by a factor of 5 than those among participants without immunosuppression.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

No citation lists for this paper

No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.

References 25 · Cited by 147

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [18]Walsh EE, Frenck RW Jr, Falsey AR,. Safety and immunogenicity of two RNA-based Covid-19 vaccine candidates. N Engl J Med. 2020; 383(25): 2439- 2450. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa2027906 33053279 PMC7583697 · DOI · Paper page

Authors
Goshen-Lago, T., Waldhorn, I., Holland, R., Szwarcwort-Cohen, M., Reiner-Benaim, A., Shachor-Meyouhas, Y., Hussein, K., Fahoum, L., Baruch, M., Peer, A., Reiter, Y., Almog, R., Halberthal, M., & Ben-Aharon, I.
Affiliations
  • Division of Oncology, Rambam Health Care Campus, Haifa, Israel
  • Rambam Health Care Campus (IL)
  • Virology Laboratory, Rambam Health Care Campus, Haifa, Israel
  • Clinical Epidemiology Unit, Rambam Health Care Campus, Haifa, Israel
  • General Management, Rambam Health Care Campus, Haifa, Israel
  • Technion – Israel Institute of Technology (IL)
Venue
JAMA Oncology
Published
2021-10-01
Volume
7
Issue
10
Pages
1507
ISSN
2374-2437 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3182782630
Cited by
147
References
25
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 26 · 2022: 72 · 2021: 37
FWCI
11.40
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Locations
  • JAMA Oncology (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Israel Cancer Research Fund (16-1276-CRCDA)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › COVID-19 and healthcare impacts
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › COVID-19 Clinical Research Studies
Keywords
BNT162b2, COVID-19 vaccination, cancer patients, seroconversion, vaccine safety, vaccine adverse events, SARS-CoV-2, IgG, immunogenicity, vulnerable populations, healthcare workers, liver enzymes, blood cell count, immunosuppression
MeSH terms
Seroconversion, COVID-19 Vaccines, BNT162 Vaccine, Adult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Antibodies, Viral, Antineoplastic Agents, Humans, Immunoglobulin G, Israel, Male, Middle Aged, Neoplasms, Prospective Studies, Case-Control Studies, Treatment Outcome, Tertiary Care Centers

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review