Cited by 42Global Cancer Incidence and ScreeningLung Cancer Diagnosis and TreatmentLung Cancer Research Studies

The Burden of Lung Cancer in Women Compared With Men in the US

Open access
Jemal, Ahmedin, Schafer, Elizabeth J., Sung, Hyuna, Bandi, Priti, Kratzer, Tyler, Islami, Farhad, Siegel, Rebecca L.·2023·JAMA Oncology

Abstract

This cross-sectional study examines the incidence rates of lung cancer in women compared with men from 2000 to 2019.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1001/jamaoncol.2023.4415

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Incidence rates in women are approaching or surpassing those in men in several countries at younger or middle ages and in recent generations in Europe and Northern America.

    “The net result is that incidence rates in women are approaching or surpassing those in men in several countries at younger or middle ages and in recent generations in Europe and Northern America, 18,20,21 forewarning of a relatively higher overall lung cancer burden among women in future decades.”

    From Global cancer statistics 2022: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. (2024) · cites this paper as [20]

    The Results report that lung cancer incidence in US women aged 35–54 exceeded that in men by 2015–2019, and the Discussion says this pattern now extends to middle-aged adults. The Methods establish that the data are from US registries; this paper does not support the claim about several countries or Europe. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Jemal, A., Schafer, E. J., Sung, H., Bandi, P., Kratzer, T., Islami, F., & Siegel, R. L.
Affiliations
American Cancer Society (US)
Corresponding author
Jemal, Ahmedin
Venue
JAMA Oncology
Published
2023-12-01
Volume
9
Issue
12
Pages
1727
ISSN
2374-2437 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4387563673
Cited by
42
References
4
Citations by year
2026: 12 · 2025: 14 · 2024: 16
FWCI
5.10
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • JAMA Oncology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Global Cancer Incidence and Screening
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Lung Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Lung Cancer Research Studies
Keywords
lung cancer, sex differences, incidence rates, women, men, gender disparities, cancer burden
MeSH terms
Female, Humans, Lung Neoplasms, Male, Risk Factors, United States, Cohort Studies, Incidence

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review