Cited by 148Ethics and Legal Issues in Pediatric HealthcareEthics in Clinical ResearchHealthcare Decision-Making and Restraints

Accuracy of the MacArthur Competence Assessment Tool for Clinical Research (MacCAT-CR) for Measuring Children’s Competence to Consent to Clinical Research

Hein, Irma M., Troost, Pieter W., Lindeboom, Robert, Benninga, Marc A., Zwaan, C. Michel, van Goudoever, Johannes B., Lindauer, Ramón J. L.·2014·JAMA Pediatrics

Abstract

IMPORTANCE: An objective assessment of children's competence to consent to research participation is currently not possible. Age limits for asking children's consent vary considerably between countries, and, to our knowledge, the correlation between competence and children's age has never been systematically investigated. OBJECTIVES: To test a standardized competence assessment instrument for children by modifying the MacArthur Competence Assessment Tool for Clinical Research (MacCAT-CR), to investigate its reliability and validity, and to examine the correlation of its assessment with age and estimate cutoff ages. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: This prospective study included children and adolescents aged 6 to 18 years in the inpatient and outpatient departments of allergology, gastroenterology, oncology, ophthalmology, and pulmonology from January 1, 2012, through January 1, 2014. Participants were eligible for clinical research studies, including observational studies and randomized clinical trials. EXPOSURES: Competence judgments by experts aware of the 4 relevant criteria-understanding, appreciation, reasoning, and choice-were used to establish the reference standard. The index test was the MacCAT-CR, which used a semistructured interview format. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: Interrater reliability, validity, and dimensionality of the MacCAT-CR and estimated cutoff ages for competence. RESULTS: Of 209 eligible patients, we included 161 (mean age, 10.6 years; 47.2% male). Good reproducibility of MacCAT-CR total and subscale scores was observed (intraclass correlation coefficient range, 0.68-0.92). We confirmed unidimensionality of the MacCAT-CR. By the reference standard, we judged 54 children (33.5%) to be incompetent; by the MacCAT-CR, 61 children (37.9%). Criterion-related validity of MacCAT-CR scores was supported by high overall accuracy in correctly classifying children as competent against the reference standard (area under the receiver operating characteristics curve, 0.78). Age was a good predictor of competence on the MacCAT-CR (area under the receiver operating characteristics curve, 0.90). In children younger than 9.6 years, competence was unlikely (sensitivity, 90%); in those older than 11.2 years, competence was probable (specificity, 90%). The optimal cutoff age was 10.4 years (sensitivity, 81%; specificity, 84%). CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: The MacCAT-CR demonstrated strong psychometric properties. In children aged 9.6 to 11.2 years, consent may be justified when competence can be demonstrated in individual cases by the MacCAT-CR. The results contribute to a scientific underpinning of regulations for clinical research directed toward children.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1001/jamapediatrics.2014.1694

Cites

24 of 24 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Hein, I. M., Troost, P. W., Lindeboom, R., Benninga, M. A., Zwaan, C. M., van Goudoever, J. B., & Lindauer, R. J. L.
Affiliations
  • Amsterdam UMC Location University of Amsterdam (NL)
  • Erasmus MC (NL)
  • Department of Pediatrics, Emma Children’s Hospital, Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam, the Netherlands5Department of Pediatrics, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
Corresponding author
Hein, Irma M.
Venue
JAMA Pediatrics
Published
2014-12-01
Volume
168
Issue
12
Pages
1147
ISSN
  • 1072-4710 (ISSN-L)
  • 2168-6203
OpenAlex
W2027083136
Cited by
148
References
24
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 21 · 2023: 16 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 17 · 2020: 17 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 11 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 13 · 2015: 13 · 2014: 2
FWCI
10.35
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Archives of Pediatrics and Adolescent Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Amsterdam UMC (VU Amsterdam) - Institutional Repository (publishedVersion)
  • EUR Research Repository (Erasmus University Rotterdam) (publishedVersion)
  • Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion)
  • EUR Research Repository (Erasmus University Rotterdam) (submittedVersion)
  • Pure Amsterdam UMC (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Ethics and Legal Issues in Pediatric Healthcare
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Ethics in Clinical Research
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Healthcare Decision-Making and Restraints
Keywords
capacity to consent, children's participation in research, informed consent, competency assessment instrument, inter-rater reliability, criterion validity, children and adolescents, clinical research
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Age Factors, Child, Female, Humans, Male, Prospective Studies, Psychometrics, Surveys and Questionnaires, Sensitivity and Specificity, Reproducibility of Results, Mental Competency, Comprehension, Biomedical Research, Informed Consent By Minors

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review