Cited by 126Pediatric Urology and Nephrology StudiesUrinary Tract Infections ManagementKidney Stones and Urolithiasis Treatments

Development and Validation of a Calculator for Estimating the Probability of Urinary Tract Infection in Young Febrile Children

Open access
Shaikh, Nader, Hoberman, Alejandro, Hum, Stephanie W., Alberty, Anastasia, Muniz, Gysella, Kurs-Lasky, Marcia, Landsittel, Douglas, Shope, Timothy·2018·JAMA Pediatrics

Abstract

Importance: Accurately estimating the probability of urinary tract infection (UTI) in febrile preverbal children is necessary to appropriately target testing and treatment. Objective: To develop and test a calculator (UTICalc) that can first estimate the probability of UTI based on clinical variables and then update that probability based on laboratory results. Design, Setting, and Participants: Review of electronic medical records of febrile children aged 2 to 23 months who were brought to the emergency department of Children's Hospital of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania. An independent training database comprising 1686 patients brought to the emergency department between January 1, 2007, and April 30, 2013, and a validation database of 384 patients were created. Five multivariable logistic regression models for predicting risk of UTI were trained and tested. The clinical model included only clinical variables; the remaining models incorporated laboratory results. Data analysis was performed between June 18, 2013, and January 12, 2018. Exposures: Documented temperature of 38°C or higher in children aged 2 months to less than 2 years. Main Outcomes and Measures: With the use of culture-confirmed UTI as the main outcome, cutoffs for high and low UTI risk were identified for each model. The resultant models were incorporated into a calculation tool, UTICalc, which was used to evaluate medical records. Results: A total of 2070 children were included in the study. The training database comprised 1686 children, of whom 1216 (72.1%) were female and 1167 (69.2%) white. The validation database comprised 384 children, of whom 291 (75.8%) were female and 200 (52.1%) white. Compared with the American Academy of Pediatrics algorithm, the clinical model in UTICalc reduced testing by 8.1% (95% CI, 4.2%-12.0%) and decreased the number of UTIs that were missed from 3 cases to none. Compared with empirically treating all children with a leukocyte esterase test result of 1+ or higher, the dipstick model in UTICalc would have reduced the number of treatment delays by 10.6% (95% CI, 0.9%-20.4%). Conclusions and Relevance: UTICalc estimates the probability of UTI by evaluating the risk factors present in the individual child. As a result, testing and treatment can be tailored, thereby improving outcomes for children with UTI.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1001/jamapediatrics.2018.0217

Cites

21 of 21 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Shaikh, N., Hoberman, A., Hum, S. W., Alberty, A., Muniz, G., Kurs-Lasky, M., Landsittel, D., & Shope, T.
Affiliations
  • Children's Hospital of Pittsburgh (US)
  • University of Pittsburgh (US)
  • Division of General Academic Pediatrics, Children’s Hospital of Pittsburgh of University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
Corresponding author
Shaikh, Nader
Venue
JAMA Pediatrics
Published
2018-06-01
Volume
172
Issue
6
Pages
550
ISSN
  • 1072-4710 (ISSN-L)
  • 2168-6203
OpenAlex
W2802392202
Cited by
126
References
21
Citations by year
2026: 9 · 2025: 13 · 2024: 20 · 2023: 13 · 2022: 27 · 2021: 21 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 11 · 2018: 2
FWCI
12.15
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Archives of Pediatrics and Adolescent Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (T35DK065521)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Pediatric Urology and Nephrology Studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Urinary Tract Infections Management
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Kidney Stones and Urolithiasis Treatments
Keywords
urinary tract infection, febrile infants, preverbal children, risk prediction model, urine culture, empirical antibiotic therapy, emergency department, model validation, multivariable logistic regression, missed diagnosis, treatment delay, cost-effectiveness of testing
MeSH terms
Algorithms, Emergency Service, Hospital, Female, Fever, Humans, Infant, Male, Pennsylvania, Risk Factors, Urinary Tract Infections, Reproducibility of Results, Prevalence, Urinalysis

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review