Cited by 124Vaccine Coverage and HesitancyEthics and Legal Issues in Pediatric HealthcareSARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 Research

Should We Mandate a COVID-19 Vaccine for Children?

Opel, Douglas J., Diekema, Douglas S., Ross, Lainie Friedman·2021·JAMA Pediatrics

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1001/jamapediatrics.2020.3019

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Opel, D. J., Diekema, D. S., & Ross, L. F.
Affiliations
  • University of Washington (US)
  • University of Chicago (US)
Corresponding author
Ross, Lainie Friedman
Venue
JAMA Pediatrics
Published
2021-02-01
Volume
175
Issue
2
Pages
125
ISSN
  • 1072-4710 (ISSN-L)
  • 2168-6203
OpenAlex
W3084549970
Cited by
124
References
4
Citations by year
2025: 2 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 30 · 2022: 38 · 2021: 43 · 2020: 2 · 2013: 1
FWCI
15.63
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Archives of Pediatrics and Adolescent Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Health › Vaccine Coverage and Hesitancy
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Ethics and Legal Issues in Pediatric Healthcare
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 Research
Keywords
COVID-19 vaccines, children, mandatory vaccination, adolescent vaccination, public health policy
MeSH terms
Vaccination Coverage, COVID-19, COVID-19 Vaccines, Child, Humans, Patient Acceptance of Health Care, Policy Making, Vaccination, Mandatory Programs

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review