Cited by 41Privacy, Security, and Data ProtectionChild Development and Digital TechnologyImpact of Technology on Adolescents

Data Collection Practices of Mobile Applications Played by Preschool-Aged Children

Open access
Zhao, Fangwei, Egelman, Serge, Weeks, Heidi M., Kaciroti, Niko, Miller, Alison L., Radesky, Jenny S.·2020·JAMA Pediatrics

Abstract

Importance: Child-directed mobile applications (apps) have been found to collect digital identifiers and transmit them to third-party companies, a potential violation of federal privacy rules. This study seeks to examine the differences in app data collection and sharing practices by evaluating the sociodemographic characteristics of the children who play them. Objective: To examine data collection and sharing practices of 451 apps played by young children and to test associations with child sociodemographic characteristics. Design, Setting, and Participants: This study used data from the baseline phase of the Preschooler Tablet Study, a prospective cohort study conducted from August 2018 to January 2020. This study used a population-based sample. A convenience sample of the parents of preschool-aged children was recruited from pediatric offices, childcare centers, social media posts, and an online participant registry. Eligibility criteria included (1) parent or guardian of a child aged 3 to 5 years, (2) parent or guardian who lived with the child at least 5 days per week, (3) participants who spoke English, and (4) a child who used an Android (Google LLC) device. All interactions with participants were through email, online surveys, and mobile device sampling. Exposures: Sociodemographic characteristics were assessed by parental report. Main Outcomes and Measures: This study tested the hypothesis that data transmissions to third-party domains are more common in apps played by children from low-socioeconomic-status homes. Child app usage was assessed via a mobile sampling app for an average of 9 days. Persistent identifier data transmissions to third-party domains were quantified for each app using an instrumented Android environment with monitoring of network traffic; for each child, the counts of total data transmissions were calculated, and the total third-party domains were detected for the apps they played. Results: Our sample comprised 124 children who used Android devices (35 tablets, 89 smartphones; 65 girls [52%]; mean [SD] age, 3.85 [0.57] years; 87 non-Hispanic White [71%]). One hundred twenty of participating parents (97%) were women. Of 451 apps tested, 303 (67%) transmitted persistent identifiers to 1 to 33 third-party domains. Child data transmission counts ranged from 0 to 614 (median [interquartile range], 5.0 [1-17.5]) and third-party domain counts from 0 to 399 (4.0 [1-12.5]). In multivariable negative binomial regression models, higher transmission and third-party domain rates per app were positively associated with older age (rate ratio, 1.67 [95% CI, 1.20-2.33]; P = .002 and 1.69 [95% CI, 1.26-2.27]; P < .001, respectively) and lower parent educational attainment (eg, high school or General Educational Development or less rate ratio, 2.29 [95% CI, 1.20-4.39]; P = .003 and 2.05 [95% CI, 1.13-3.70]; P < .02, respectively), but not with household income. Conclusions and Relevance: This study found that apps used by young children had a high frequency of persistent identifier transmissions to third-party companies, suggesting that federal privacy rules are not being enforced. Older children, those with their own devices, or those from lower-education households may be at higher risk of potential privacy violations.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1001/jamapediatrics.2020.3345

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 12

  1. Vaala S, Ly A, Levine MH. Getting a Read on the App Stores: A Market Scan and Analysis of Children's Literacy Apps. Joan Ganz Cooney Center at Sesame Workshop; 2015.
  2. Zhao J. Are children well-supported by their parents concerning online privacy risks, and who supports the parents? Published April 28, 2018. Accessed September 1, 2019. https://arxiv.org/pdf/ 1809.10944.pdf
  3. Yao Y, Lo Re D, Wang Y. Folk models of online behavioral advertising. Paper presented at: 2017 ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work and Social Computing; February 1-March 25, 2017; Portland, Oregon. Accessed September 1, 2019. https://www.researchgate.net/ publication/313738097_Folk_Models_of_Online_ Behavioral_Advertising
  4. Binns R, Lyngs U, Van Kleek M, Zhao J, Libert T, Shadbolt N. Third party tracking in the mobile ecosystem. Accessed September 1, 2019. https:// arxiv.org/pdf/1804.03603.pdf · arXiv
  5. Reyes I, Wijesekera P, Reardon J, et al "Won't somebody think of the children?" examining COPPA compliance at scale. Proc Priv Enh Technol. 2018; 2018:63-83. doi:10.1515/popets-2018-0021 · DOI
  6. Lee H, Wong SF, Oh J, Chang Y. Information privacy concerns and demographic characteristics: Data from a Korean media panel survey. Gov Inf Q. 2019;36:294-303. doi:10.1016/j.giq.2019.01.002 · DOI
  7. Park YJ. Digital literacy and privacy behavior online. Commun Res. 2013;40:215-236. doi:10.1177/ 0093650211418338 · DOI
  8. Harris PA, Taylor R, Thielke R, Payne J, Gonzalez N, Conde JG. Research electronic data capture (REDCap)-a metadata-driven methodology and workflow process for providing translational research informatics support. J Biomed Inform. 2009;42(2):377-381. doi:10.1016/j.jbi.2008.08.010 · DOI · Paper page
  9. Radesky JS, Weeks HM, Ball R, et al. Young children's use of smartphones and tablets. Pediatrics. 2020;146(1):e20193518. doi:10.1542/peds.2019-3518 · DOI · Paper page
  10. Livingstone S, Third A. Children and Young People's Rights in the Digital Age: An Emerging Agenda. Sage Publications; 2017.
  11. Kang R, Dabbish L, Fruchter N, Kiesler S. "My data just goes everywhere:" user mental models of the internet and implications for privacy and security. Paper presented at: Eleventh Symposium On Usable Privacy and Security; July 22-24, 2015; Ottawa, Canada. Accessed September 1, 2019. https://www.usenix.org/conference/soups2015/ proceedings/presentation/kang
  12. Schaub F, Breaux TD, Sadeh N. Crowdsourcing privacy policy analysis: potential, challenges and best practices. it-Inf Technol. 2016;58:229-236. doi: 10.1515/itit-2016-0009 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Zhao, F., Egelman, S., Weeks, H. M., Kaciroti, N., Miller, A. L., & Radesky, J. S.
Affiliations
  • University of Michigan (US)
  • International Computer Science Institute (US)
Corresponding author
Radesky, Jenny S.
Venue
JAMA Pediatrics
Published
2020-12-07
Volume
174
Issue
12
Pages
e203345
ISSN
  • 1072-4710 (ISSN-L)
  • 2168-6203
OpenAlex
W3084258407
Cited by
41
References
3
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 3
FWCI
8.03
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Archives of Pediatrics and Adolescent Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Science Foundation (1817248)
  • Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (R21HD094051, R41HD100230, K23HD092626)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Privacy, Security, and Data Protection
  • Social Sciences › Education › Child Development and Digital Technology
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Impact of Technology on Adolescents
Keywords
mobile application, data collection practices, third-party data sharing, persistent identifiers, preschool children, socioeconomic status, sociodemographic factors, Android devices, network traffic monitoring, children's online privacy
MeSH terms
Child, Child Welfare, Child, Preschool, Confidentiality, Female, Humans, Play and Playthings, Prospective Studies, Computers, Handheld, Mobile Applications

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review