Cited by 674Gender Roles and Identity StudiesMental Health Treatment and AccessAnxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes

The DOI matches its Crossref record, with a small difference in title or year; 21 of the 21 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

The Experience of Symptoms of Depression in Men vs Women: Analysis of the National Comorbidity Survey Replication

Abstract

IMPORTANCE: When men are depressed they may experience symptoms that are different than what is included in the current diagnostic criteria. OBJECTIVE: To explore whether sex disparities in depression rates disappear when alternative symptoms are considered in the place of, or in addition to, more conventional depression symptoms. DESIGN, SETTING, PARTICIPANTS, AND MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: Using data from the National Comorbidity Survey Replication, a nationally represented mental health survey, we evaluated sex differences in symptom endorsement in 2 new scales that included alternative depression symptoms. We analyzed sex differences in symptom endorsement using 2-sided, design-based, .05-level t tests and multivariate logistic regression to identify predictors of depression. RESULTS; Men reported higher rates of anger attacks/aggression, substance abuse, and risk taking compared with women. Analyses using the scale that included alternative, male-type symptoms of depression found that a higher proportion of men (26.3%) than women (21.9%) (P = .007) met criteria for depression. Analyses using the scale that included alternative and traditional depression symptoms found that men and women met criteria for depression in equal proportions: 30.6% of men and 33.3% of women (P = .57). CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: When alternative and traditional symptoms are combined, sex disparities in the prevalence of depression are eliminated. Further study is needed to clarify which symptoms truly describe men's experiences of depression.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2013.1985

Cites

21 of 21 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Show all 21 references

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 601–672 of 672

Metadata

Authors
Martin, L. A., Neighbors, H. W., & Griffith, D. M.
Affiliations
  • University of Michigan–Dearborn (US)
  • University of Michigan (US)
  • Vanderbilt University (US)
Corresponding author
Martin, Lisa A.
Venue
JAMA Psychiatry
Published
2013-10-01
Volume
70
Issue
10
Pages
1100
ISSN
2168-622X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2133574018
Cited by
674
References
21
Citations by year
2026: 52 · 2025: 49 · 2024: 61 · 2023: 59 · 2022: 66 · 2021: 79 · 2020: 62 · 2019: 44 · 2018: 49 · 2017: 43 · 2016: 42 · 2015: 39 · 2014: 26 · 2013: 3
FWCI
86.90
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • JAMA Psychiatry (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Gender Roles and Identity Studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Mental Health Treatment and Access
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
Keywords
depression, sex differences, anger attacks, aggression, substance abuse, risk-taking, diagnostic criteria, depression prevalence, National Comorbidity Survey Replication
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Aged, Depression, Female, Health Surveys, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Psychiatric Status Rating Scales, Sex Characteristics, Logistic Models, Symptom Assessment

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review