Cited by 418Suicide and Self-Harm StudiesEmergency and Acute Care StudiesPsychiatric care and mental health services

Suicide Prevention in an Emergency Department Population: The ED-SAFE Study

Open access
Miller, Ivan W., Camargo, Carlos A., Arias, Sarah A., Sullivan, Ashley F., Allen, Michael H., Goldstein, Amy B., Manton, Anne P., Espinola, Janice A. +4 more·2017·JAMA Psychiatry

Abstract

Importance: Suicide is a leading cause of deaths in the United States. Although the emergency department (ED) is an opportune setting for initiating suicide prevention efforts, ED-initiated suicide prevention interventions remain underdeveloped. Objective: To determine whether an ED-initiated intervention reduces subsequent suicidal behavior. Design, Setting, and Participants: This multicenter study of 8 EDs in the United States enrolled adults with a recent suicide attempt or ideation and was composed of 3 sequential phases: (1) a treatment as usual (TAU) phase from August 2010 to December 2011, (2) a universal screening (screening) phase from September 2011 to December 2012, and (3) a universal screening plus intervention (intervention) phase from July 2012 to November 2013. Interventions: Screening consisted of universal suicide risk screening. The intervention phase consisted of universal screening plus an intervention, which included secondary suicide risk screening by the ED physician, discharge resources, and post-ED telephone calls focused on reducing suicide risk. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary outcome was suicide attempts (nonfatal and fatal) over the 52-week follow-up period. The proportion and total number of attempts were analyzed. Results: A total of 1376 participants were recruited, including 769 females (55.9%) with a median (interquartile range) age of 37 (26-47) years. A total of 288 participants (20.9%) made at least 1 suicide attempt, and there were 548 total suicide attempts among participants. There were no significant differences in risk reduction between the TAU and screening phases (23% vs 22%, respectively). However, compared with the TAU phase, patients in the intervention phase showed a 5% absolute reduction in suicide attempt risk (23% vs 18%), with a relative risk reduction of 20%. Participants in the intervention phase had 30% fewer total suicide attempts than participants in the TAU phase. Negative binomial regression analysis indicated that the participants in the intervention phase had significantly fewer total suicide attempts than participants in the TAU phase (incidence rate ratio, 0.72; 95% CI, 0.52-1.00; P = .05) but no differences between the TAU and screening phases (incidence rate ratio, 1.00; 95% CI, 0.71-1.41; P = .99). Conclusions and Relevance: Among at-risk patients in the ED, a combination of brief interventions administered both during and after the ED visit decreased post-ED suicidal behavior.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2017.0678

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Among patients who presented to an emergency department for acute suicide risk, CLASP was associated with a 20% reduction in suicide attempts versus treatment as usual.

    “Among patients who presented to an emergency department for acute suicide risk, CLASP was associated with a 20% reduction in suicide attempts versus treatment as usual (Miller et al., 2017).”

    From An Open-Phase Pilot Trial of an Integration of Prolonged Exposure Therapy and the Coping Long-Term With Active Suicide Program (2026) · cites this paper as Miller et al., 2017

    The Primary Analyses report a 20% relative reduction in suicide-attempt risk for the intervention phase versus treatment as usual. But the Study Design and Settings describe CLASP-based calls as only one component of a three-part intervention, and the Discussion says the components’ individual contributions cannot be identified. The study therefore does not establish a 20% reduction attributable to CLASP alone; page numbers were not provided in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.90)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • The meta-analysis included four randomised controlled trials, one non-randomised controlled trial, and one interrupted time-series design.

    “The meta-analysis included four randomised controlled trials, 12,13,29,30 a non-randomised controlled trial 18 and one study with an interrupted time-series design.17”

    From Safety planning-type interventions for suicide prevention: meta-analysis (2021) · cites this paper as [17]

    Citation 17 is attached to the interrupted time-series study, not to the counts of other trials. The Study Design and Settings section describes three sequential phases, and the Limitations section says the study used a sequential design rather than a randomized trial. The paper does not identify its design as an interrupted time series, so it supports the sequential-design characterization but not that more specific label. (LLM, conf=0.78)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Screening in EDs without an associated follow-up intervention to bolster treatment adherence and adherence to a safety plan is no better than usual care, whereas screening coupled with follow-up calls can reduce suicide attempts relative to usual care in the ED.

    “However, screening in EDs without an associated follow-up intervention to bolster treatment adherence and adherence to a safety plan is no better than usual care, whereas screening coupled with follow-up calls can reduce suicide attempts relative to usual care in the ED 215 .”

    From Suicide and suicide risk (2019) · cites this paper as [215]

    Split into 2 atoms — 1 confirmed, 1 partially supported, 0 disputed, 0 misattributed, 0 unverifiable. Expand the claim to see per-atom verdicts.

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • In a multicentre study conducted in 8 emergency departments, 1,376 patients were assigned to usual care, universal screening, or universal screening plus a brief intervention; only the latter resulted in a 5% risk reduction in suicide attempts in the subsequent year (OR=0.72).

    “universal screening plus a brief intervention, with only the latter resulting in a 5% risk reduction in suicide attempts in”

    From Suicide and suicide risk (2019) · cites this paper as Miller et al., 2017

    Split into 2 atoms — 1 confirmed, 1 partially supported, 0 disputed, 0 misattributed, 0 unverifiable. Expand the claim to see per-atom verdicts.

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • The ED-SAFE intervention resulted in fewer suicide attempts over a year compared to treatment as usual.

    “The ED-SAFE intervention resulted in fewer suicide attempts over a year compared to treatment as usual 215 .”

    From Suicide and suicide risk (2019) · cites this paper as [215]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 32 · Cited by 418

Authors
Miller, I. W., Camargo, C. A., Arias, S. A., Sullivan, A. F., Allen, M. H., Goldstein, A. B., Manton, A. P., Espinola, J. A., Jones, R., Hasegawa, K., Boudreaux, E. D., & for the ED-SAFE Investigators
Affiliations
  • Brown University (US)
  • Harvard University (US)
  • University of Colorado Depression Center, Aurora4Rocky Mountain Crisis Partners, Aurora, Colorado
  • National Institutes of Health (US)
  • Cape Cod Healthcare (US)
  • University of Massachusetts Chan Medical School (US)
Corresponding author
Miller, Ivan W.
Venue
JAMA Psychiatry
Published
2017-06-01
Volume
74
Issue
6
Pages
563
ISSN
2168-622X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2607835920
Cited by
418
References
32
Citations by year
2026: 31 · 2025: 53 · 2024: 35 · 2023: 53 · 2022: 47 · 2021: 58 · 2020: 48 · 2019: 37 · 2018: 31 · 2017: 25
FWCI
47.70
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • JAMA Psychiatry (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • The Journal of the American Medical Association (JAMA) Network (American Medical Association) (submittedVersion)
Funders
National Institute of Mental Health (U01MH088278)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Suicide and Self-Harm Studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Emergency Medicine › Emergency and Acute Care Studies
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychiatric care and mental health services
Keywords
suicide prevention, emergency department, suicide attempts, suicide risk screening, universal screening, suicide attempters, suicidal ideation, suicide risk reduction, follow-up
MeSH terms
Suicide Prevention, Adult, Combined Modality Therapy, Emergency Service, Hospital, Emergency Services, Psychiatric, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Humans, Male, Mass Screening, Middle Aged, Psychotherapy, Rhode Island, Suicide, Suicide, Attempted, Hotlines, Risk Assessment, Case Management, Kaplan-Meier Estimate, Secondary Prevention, Suicidal Ideation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review