The DOI matches its Crossref record; 77 of the 81 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Assessment of the Prodromal Questionnaire–Brief Child Version for Measurement of Self-reported Psychoticlike Experiences in Childhood
Open accessAbstract
Importance: Childhood psychoticlike experiences (PLEs) are associated with greater odds of a diagnosis of a psychotic disorder during adulthood. However, no known, well-validated self-report tools have been designed to measure childhood PLEs. Objective: To examine the construct validity and psychometric properties of a measure of PLEs, the Prodromal Questionnaire-Brief Child Version (PQ-BC). Design, Setting, and Participants: This validation study used data from the first wave of the Adolescent Brain and Cognitive Development (ABCD) Study, a prospective longitudinal study aimed at assessing risk factors associated with adverse physical and mental health outcomes from ages 9 to 10 years into late adolescence and early adulthood. The population-based sample of 3984 children within the ABCD data set was recruited from 20 research sites across the United States. Data for this study were collected from June 1, 2016, through August 31, 2017. Main Outcomes and Measures: The PQ-BC Total and Distress scores were analyzed for measurement invariance across race/ethnicity and sex, their associations with measures of PLEs, and their associations with known correlates of PLEs, including internalizing and externalizing symptoms, neuropsychological test performance, and developmental milestones. Results: The study analyses included 3984 participants (1885 girls [47.3%] and 2099 boys [52.7%]; mean [SE] age, 10.0 [0.01] years). The results demonstrated measurement invariance across race/ethnicity and sex. A family history of psychotic disorder was associated with higher mean (SE) PQ-BC Total (3.883 [0.352]; β = 0.061; 95% CI, 0.027-0.094) and Distress (10.210 [1.043]; β = 0.051; 95% CI, 0.018-0.084) scores, whereas a family history of depression or mania was not. Higher PQ-BC scores were associated with higher rates of child-rated internalizing symptoms (Total score: β range, 0.218 [95% CI, 0.189-0.246] to 0.273 [95% CI, 0.245-0.301]; Distress score: β range, 0.248 [95% CI, 0.220-0.277] to 0.310 [95% CI, 0.281-0.338]), neuropsychological test performance deficits such as working memory (Total score: β = -0.042 [95% CI, -0.077 to -0.008]; Distress score: β = -0.051 [95% CI, -0.086 to -0.017]), and motor and speech developmental milestone delays (Total score: β = 0.057 [95% CI, 0.026-0.086] for motor; β = 0.042 [95% CI, 0.010-0.073] for speech; Distress score: β = 0.048 [95% CI, 0.017-0.079] for motor; β = 0.049 [95% CI, 0.018-0.081] for speech). Conclusions and Relevance: These results provide support for the construct validity and demonstrate adequate psychometric properties of a self-report instrument designed to measure childhood PLEs, providing evidence that the PQ-BC may be a useful measure of early risk for psychotic disorders. Furthermore, these data suggest that PLEs at school age are associated with many of the same familial, cognitive, and emotional factors associated with psychotic symptoms in older populations, consistent with the dimensionality of psychosis across the lifespan.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“For example, 'psychotic experiences' 159 are relatively frequent at the population level (prevalence about 8% in young adults aged 24 160 ) and can be measured through self-administered questionnaires (e.g., Prodromal Questionnaire, PQ) 161”
From Preventive psychiatry: a blueprint for improving the mental health of young people (2021) · cites this paper as [161]
In the citing paper
“Screening for psychotic experiences (data not available) 161 *”
From Preventive psychiatry: a blueprint for improving the mental health of young people (2021) · cites this paper as [161]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Fitting Linear Mixed-Effects Models Using lme4
Bates, D., Mächler, M., Bolker, B., & Walker, S. (2015) · Journal of Statistical Software · doi:10.18637/jss.v067.i01 · Cited by 86,835
lavaan : An R Package for Structural Equation Modeling
Rosseel, Y. (2012) · Journal of Statistical Software · doi:10.18637/jss.v048.i02 · Cited by 27,955
Confirmatory factor analysis for applied research
Brown, T. A. (2007) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.44-2769 · Cited by 15,621
Simultaneous Inference in General Parametric Models
Hothorn, T., Bretz, F., & Westfall, P. H. (2008) · Biometrical Journal · doi:10.1002/bimj.200810425 · Cited by 14,265
KAUFMAN, J., BIRMAHER, B., BRENT, D., RAO, U., FLYNN, C., MORECI, P., WILLIAMSON, D., & RYAN, N. (1997) · Journal of the American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry · doi:10.1097/00004583-199707000-00021 · Cited by 10,148
mediation : R Package for Causal Mediation Analysis
Tingley, D. H., Yamamoto, T., Hirose, K., Keele, L. J., & Imai, K. (2014) · Journal of Statistical Software · doi:10.18637/jss.v059.i05 · Cited by 4,216
A New Incremental Fit Index for General Structural Equation Models
Bollen, K. A. (1989) · Sociological Methods & Research · doi:10.1177/0049124189017003004 · Cited by 3,008
van Os, J., Linscott, R. J., Myin-Germeys, I., Delespaul, P., & Krabbendam, L. (2009) · Psychological Medicine · doi:10.1017/s0033291708003814 · Cited by 2,343
Cognition assessment using the NIH Toolbox
Weintraub, S., Dikmen, S. S., Heaton, R. K., Tulsky, D. S., Zelazo, P. D., Bauer, P. J., Carlozzi, N. E., Slotkin, J., Blitz, D., Wallner-Allen, K., et al. (2013) · Neurology · doi:10.1212/wnl.0b013e3182872ded · Cited by 1,287
Vision assessment using the NIH Toolbox
Varma, R., McKean‐Cowdin, R., Vitale, S., Slotkin, J., & Hays, R. D. (2013) · Neurology · doi:10.1212/wnl.0b013e3182876e0a · Cited by 1,200
Research works printed but not linked: 3
- Laurens, 2011, Schizophrenia: The Final Frontier
- Hirshfeld-Becker, 2006, Being Brave: A Program for Coping with Anxiety for Young Children and Their Parents
- Achenbach, 2009, The Achenbach System of Emprically Based Assessment (ASEBA): Development, Findings, Theory and Applications
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Preventive psychiatry: a blueprint for improving the mental health of young people
Fusar‐Poli, P., Correll, C. U., Arango, C., Berk, M., Patel, V., & Ioannidis, J. P. A. (2021) · World Psychiatry · doi:10.1002/wps.20869 · Cited by 497
The ABCD study: understanding the development of risk for mental and physical health outcomes
Karcher, N. R., & Barch, D. M. (2021) · Neuropsychopharmacology · doi:10.1038/s41386-020-0736-6 · Cited by 351
Self-citationAssociations Between Prenatal Cannabis Exposure and Childhood Outcomes
Paul, S. E., Hatoum, A. S., Fine, J. D., Johnson, E. C., Hansen, I. S., Karcher, N. R., Moreau, A. L., Bondy, E., Qu, Y. L., Carter, E. B., et al. (2020) · JAMA Psychiatry · doi:10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2020.2902 · Cited by 344
Self-citationRisk and protective factors for mental disorders beyond genetics: an evidence‐based atlas
Arango, C., Dragioti, E., Solmi, M., Cortese, S., Domschke, K., Murray, R. M., Jones, P. B., Uher, R., Carvalho, A. F., Reichenberg, A., et al. (2021) · World Psychiatry · doi:10.1002/wps.20894 · Cited by 349
Barch, D. M., Albaugh, M. D., Baskin-sommers, A. R., Bryant, B. E., Clark, D. B., Dick, A. S., Feczko, E., Foxe, J. J., Gee, D. G., Giedd, J. N., et al. (2021) · Developmental Cognitive Neuroscience · doi:10.1016/j.dcn.2021.101031 · Cited by 149
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Karcher, N. R., Barch, D. M., Avenevoli, S., Savill, M., Huber, R. S., Simon, T. J., Leckliter, I. N., Sher, K. J., & Loewy, R. L.
- Affiliations
- Washington University in St. Louis (US)
- National Institute of Mental Health (US)
- University of California, San Francisco (US)
- University of Utah (US)
- University of California, Davis (US)
- University of Missouri (US)
- Corresponding author
- Karcher, Nicole R.
- ORCID
- Venue
- JAMA Psychiatry
- Publisher
- American Medical Association (AMA)
- Published
- 2018-08-01
- Volume
- 75
- Issue
- 8
- Pages
- 853
- ISSN
- 2168-622X (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC6143092
- OpenAlex
- W2806044632
- Cited by
- 198
- References
- 81
- Citations by year
- 2026: 24 · 2025: 26 · 2024: 42 · 2023: 29 · 2022: 23 · 2021: 27 · 2020: 18 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 2
- FWCI
- 10.62
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Locations
- JAMA Psychiatry (publishedVersion)
- Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- eScholarship (California Digital Library) (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- National Institutes of Health (UL1TR002538, MH018261, DA‐041120, MH018261-31)
- National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism (K05AA017242)
- National Institute of Mental Health (R01MH107108, T32MH014677, T32MH018261)
- National Institute on Drug Abuse (U01DA041106, U01DA041120, U01DA041156, U01DA041174, U01DA050989, U24DA041147, U01DA041148, U01DA041022, U01DA041028, U01DA051039, U01DA041134, U01DA041025, U24DA041123, U01DA041093, U01DA041089)
- National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences
- Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (R01HD042974, U54HD079125)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Schizophrenia research and treatment
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychopathy, Forensic Psychiatry, Sexual Offending
- Keywords
- self-report questionnaire validation, construct validity, measurement invariance, internalizing problems, externalizing problems, neuropsychological performance, developmental milestones, Adolescent Brain Cognitive Development Study, psychosis risk, race and ethnicity, sex differences
- MeSH terms
- Adolescent, Child, Ethnicity, Female, Humans, Male, Medical History Taking, Neuropsychological Tests, Psychometrics, Psychotic Disorders, Surveys and Questionnaires, Sex Factors, United States, Risk Assessment, Prodromal Symptoms, Symptom Assessment
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review