CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 265Posttraumatic Stress Disorder ResearchPersonality Disorders and PsychopathologyChild Abuse and Trauma

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 68 of the 68 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Dialectical Behavior Therapy for Posttraumatic Stress Disorder (DBT-PTSD) Compared With Cognitive Processing Therapy (CPT) in Complex Presentations of PTSD in Women Survivors of Childhood Abuse: A Randomized Clinical Trial

Open access
Bohus, Martin, Kleindienst, Nikolaus, Hahn, Christopher, Müller-Engelmann, Meike, Ludäscher, Petra, Steil, Regina, Fydrich, Thomas, Kuehner, Christine, Resick, Patricia A., Stiglmayr, Christian, Schmahl, Christian, Priebe, Kathlen·2020·JAMA Psychiatry
DOI 10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2020.2148PMC PMC7376475
Open this paper in CoChat — free accountOpen PDF

Abstract

Importance: Childhood abuse significantly increases the risk of developing posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD), often accompanied by symptoms of borderline personality disorder (BPD) and other co-occurring mental disorders. Despite the high prevalence, systematic evaluations of evidence-based treatments for PTSD after childhood abuse are sparse. Objective: To compare the efficacy of dialectical behavior therapy for PTSD (DBT-PTSD), a new, specifically designed, phase-based treatment program, against that of cognitive processing therapy (CPT), one of the best empirically supported treatments for PTSD. Design, Setting, and Participants: From January 2014 to October 2016, women who sought treatment were included in a multicenter randomized clinical trial with blinded outcome assessments at 3 German university outpatient clinics. The participants were prospectively observed for 15 months. Women with childhood abuse-associated PTSD who additionally met 3 or more DSM-5 criteria for BPD, including affective instability, were included. Data analysis took place from October 2018 to December 2019. Interventions: Participants received equal dosages and frequencies of DBT-PTSD or CPT, up to 45 individual sessions within 1 year and 3 additional sessions during the following 3 months. Main Outcomes and Measures: The predefined primary outcome was the course of the Clinician-Administered PTSD Scale for DSM-5 (CAPS-5) score from randomization to month 15. Intent-to-treat analyses based on dimensional CAPS-5 scores were complemented by categorical outcome measures assessing symptomatic remission, reliable improvement, and reliable recovery. Results: Of 955 consecutive individuals assessed for eligibility, 193 were randomized (DBT-PTSD, 98; CPT, 95; mean [SD] age, 36.3 [11.1] years) and included in the intent-to-treat analyses. Analysis revealed significantly improved CAPS-5 scores in both groups (effect sizes: DBT-PTSD: d, 1.35; CPT: d, 0.98) and a small but statistically significant superiority of DBT-PTSD (group difference: 4.82 [95% CI, 0.67-8.96]; P = .02; d, 0.33). Compared with the CPT group, participants in the DBT-PTSD group were less likely to drop out early (37 [39.0%] vs 25 [25.5%]; P = .046) and had higher rates of symptomatic remission (35 [40.7%] vs 52 [58.4%]; P = .02), reliable improvement (53 [55.8%] vs 73 [74.5%]; P = .006), and reliable recovery (34 [38.6%] vs 52 [57.1%]; P = .01). Conclusions and Relevance: These findings support the efficacy of DBT-PTSD and CPT in the treatment of women with childhood abuse-associated complex PTSD. Results pertaining to the primary outcomes favored DBT-PTSD. The study shows that even severe childhood abuse-associated PTSD with emotion dysregulation can be treated efficaciously. Trial Registration: German Clinical Trials Register: DRKS00005578.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2020.2148

Cites

68 of 68 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 67 references

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. Foa, 2007, Prolonged Exposure Therapy for PTSD: Emotional Processing of Traumatic Experiences.
  2. Hayes, 2011, Acceptance and Commitment Therapy: The Process And Practice of Mindful Change.
  3. Beck, 1996, Beck Depression Inventory–II Manual.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 201–265 of 265

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
Bohus, M., Kleindienst, N., Hahn, C., Müller-Engelmann, M., Ludäscher, P., Steil, R., Fydrich, T., Kuehner, C., Resick, P. A., Stiglmayr, C., Schmahl, C., & Priebe, K.
Affiliations
  • Harvard University (US)
  • Heidelberg University (DE)
  • Institute of Psychology, Goethe University Frankfurt am Main, Frankfurt, Germany
  • Goethe University Frankfurt (DE)
  • Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin (DE)
  • Duke Medical Center (US)
  • AWP Berlin, Berlin, Germany
Corresponding author
Bohus, Martin
ORCID
Venue
JAMA Psychiatry
Publisher
American Medical Association (AMA)
Published
2020-12-01
Volume
77
Issue
12
Pages
1235
ISSN
2168-622X (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2020.2148
PMC
PMC7376475
OpenAlex
W3044324912
Cited by
265
References
67
Citations by year
2026: 53 · 2025: 46 · 2024: 47 · 2023: 38 · 2022: 43 · 2021: 33 · 2020: 5
FWCI
11.91
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • JAMA Psychiatry (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung (01KR1303A, BMBF 01KR1303A, grant BMBF 01KR1303A)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Research
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Personality Disorders and Psychopathology
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Child Abuse and Trauma
Keywords
post-traumatic stress disorder, cognitive processing therapy, childhood abuse, women, borderline personality disorder, comorbid mental disorders, treatment efficacy, symptom remission, CAPS-5, individual psychotherapy, trauma-focused psychotherapy, neuroticism, women's mental health services, Germany, United States
MeSH terms
Adverse Childhood Experiences, Dialectical Behavior Therapy, Adult, Female, Humans, Middle Aged, Remission Induction, Stress Disorders, Post-Traumatic, Cognitive Behavioral Therapy, Outcome Assessment, Health Care, Adult Survivors of Child Abuse, Young Adult, Patient Acuity

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review