Cited by 2,640Child Abuse and TraumaChild and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional DevelopmentMental Health Treatment and Access

Childhood adversities and adult psychopathology in the WHO World Mental Health Surveys

Open access
Kessler, Ronald C., McLaughlin, Katie A., Green, Jennifer Greif, Gruber, Michael J., Sampson, Nancy A., Zaslavsky, Alan M., Aguilar-Gaxiola, Sergio, Alhamzawi, Ali Obaid +25 more·2010·British Journal of Psychiatry

Abstract

Background: Although significant associations of childhood adversities with adult mental disorders are widely documented, most studies focus on single childhood adversities predicting single disorders. Aims: To examine joint associations of 12 childhood adversities with first onset of 20 DSM–IV disorders in World Mental Health (WMH) Surveys in 21 countries. Method: Nationally or regionally representative surveys of 51 945 adults assessed childhood adversities and lifetime DSM–IV disorders with the WHO Composite International Diagnostic Interview (CIDI). Results: Childhood adversities were highly prevalent and interrelated. Childhood adversities associated with maladaptive family functioning (e.g. parental mental illness, child abuse, neglect) were the strongest predictors of disorders. Co-occurring childhood adversities associated with maladaptive family functioning had significant subadditive predictive associations and little specificity across disorders. Childhood adversities account for 29.8% of all disorders across countries. Conclusions: Childhood adversities have strong associations with all classes of disorders at all life-course stages in all groups of WMH countries. Long-term associations imply the existence of as-yet undetermined mediators.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1192/bjp.bp.110.080499

Cites

55 of 55 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Work to address a single adverse childhood experience in children exposed to many might have little effect, with treatment and prevention of many health conditions requiring multiple underlying adverse childhood experiences to be addressed.

    “Thus, work to address a single ACE in children exposed to many might have little effect, 51 with treatment and prevention of many health conditions requiring multiple underlying ACEs to be addressed.”

    From The effect of multiple adverse childhood experiences on health: a systematic review and meta-analysis. (2017) · cites this paper as [51]

    The ‘Implications and future research’ section says that addressing only one adversity in people exposed to many is unlikely to have important effects, and suggests reducing exposure to all adversities. But the paper studies mental disorders, not many health conditions generally, and presents multi-adversity intervention as promising rather than required. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • The World Mental Health Surveys across 21 countries found little variation in adverse childhood experience prevalence between country income groups, with 38-39% of participants reporting at least one adverse childhood experience and 2-3% reporting at least four.

    “The World Mental Health Surveys across 21 countries found little variation in ACE prevalence between country income groups, with 38-39% of participants reporting at least one ACE and the prevalence of at least four ACEs being 2-3%. 51”

    From The effect of multiple adverse childhood experiences on health: a systematic review and meta-analysis. (2017) · cites this paper as [51]

    Split into 2 atoms — 1 confirmed, 1 partially supported, 0 disputed, 0 misattributed, 0 unverifiable. Expand the claim to see per-atom verdicts.

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Potentially traumatic childhood experiences are common, and most adolescents have had at least one.

    “Exposure to potentially traumatic experiences in childhood is common, with a majority of adolescents having experienced at least one potentially traumatic event [1–3].”

    From Interventions for prevention and treatment of substance use in youth with traumatic childhood experiences: a systematic review and synthesis of the literature (2024) · cites this paper as [3]

    The Results section reports that childhood adversities were common: 38.4%–39.1% of respondents reported at least one. The paper assessed a defined set of adversities occurring before age 18, not all potentially traumatic events among adolescents; it therefore does not support the claim that a majority of adolescents had experienced one. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Childhood adversity plays a causal role in most mental health problems in childhood and adulthood.

    “Childhood adversity plays a causal role in most mental health problems in childhood (e.g., conduct disorder, ADHD and oppositional defiant disorder) and in adulthood (e.g., depression, anxiety disorders, eating disorders, sexual dysfunction, personality disorder, dissociative disorder, post-traumatic stress disorder and substance misuse) [1,2] .”

    From The traumagenic neurodevelopmental model of psychosis revisited (2014) · cites this paper as [1]

    The Results section (page not provided) reports that childhood adversities predict first onset across the disorder classes studied and across childhood and adult life-course stages. But the Limitations section (page not provided) cautions that unmeasured common causes could explain these associations without causal effects. The paper therefore does not establish a causal role in most mental health problems, including all the disorders listed in the citing sentence. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Summing of adverse childhood experiences is a recognised approach, but it does not account for potential variations in effects of different combinations of adverse childhood experiences.

    “although summing of ACEs is a recognised approach, 1,9,51,63 it does not account for potential variations in effects of different combinations of ACEs.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. [18]18. Heeringa SG, Wells JE, Hubbard F, Mneimneh Z, Chiu WT, Sampson NA. Sample designs and sampling procedures. In The WHO World Mental Health Surveys: Global Perspectives on the Epidemiology of Mental Disorders (eds RC Kessler, TB U ¨stu ¨n): 14. Cambridge University Press, 2008.
  2. [21]21. First MB, Spitzer RL, Gibbon M, Williams JBW. Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-IV Axis I Disorders, Research Version, Non-patient Edition (SCID-I/NP). Biometrics Research, New York State Psychiatric Institute, 2002.
  3. [32]32. Burnham KP, Anderson DR. Model Section and Multimodel Inferences: A Practical-theoretic Approach (2nd edn). Springer-Verlag, 2002.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Kessler, R. C., McLaughlin, K. A., Green, J. G., Gruber, M. J., Sampson, N. A., Zaslavsky, A. M., Aguilar-Gaxiola, S., Alhamzawi, A. O., Alonso, J., Angermeyer, M., Benjet, C., Bromet, E., Chatterji, S., de Girolamo, G., Demyttenaere, K., Fayyad, J., Florescu, S., Gal, G., Gureje, O., Haro, J. M., Hu, C.-Y., Karam, E. G., Kawakami, N., Lee, S., Lépine, J.-P., Ormel, J., Posada-Villa, J., Sagar, R., Tsang, A., Üstün, T. B., Vassilev, S., Viana, M. C., & Williams, D. R.
Affiliations
  • Harvard University (US)
  • Boston University (US)
  • Municipal Institute for Medical Research (ES)
  • Instituto Nacional de Psiquiatría Ramón de la Fuente Muñiz (MX)
  • Stony Brook University (US)
  • World Health Organization (CH)
  • Universitair Ziekenhuis Leuven (BE)
  • University of Balamand (LB)
  • National School of Public Health, Management and Professional Development (RO)
  • Sheba Medical Center (IL)
  • University College Hospital, Ibadan (NG)
  • Parc Sanitari Sant Joan de Déu (ES)
  • The University of Tokyo (JP)
  • Chinese University of Hong Kong (HK)
  • Inserm (FR)
  • University Medical Center Groningen (NL)
  • All India Institute of Medical Sciences (IN)
  • New Bulgarian University (BG)
Corresponding author
Kessler, Ronald C.
Venue
British Journal of Psychiatry
Published
2010-11
Volume
197
Issue
5
Pages
378-385
ISSN
  • 0007-1250 (ISSN-L)
  • 1472-1465
OpenAlex
W140219456
Cited by
2,640
References
55
Citations by year
2026: 149 · 2025: 226 · 2024: 235 · 2023: 266 · 2022: 256 · 2021: 252 · 2020: 277 · 2019: 205 · 2018: 185 · 2017: 160 · 2016: 120 · 2015: 104 · 2014: 76 · 2013: 58 · 2012: 43
FWCI
44.74
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • The British Journal of Psychiatry (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • University of Groningen research database (University of Groningen / Centre for Information Technology) (publishedVersion)
  • Scientific Electronic Library Online (São Paulo Research Foundation, Latin American and Caribbean Center on Health Sciences Information, Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico) (publishedVersion)
  • Lirias (submittedVersion)
  • University of Groningen research database (University of Groningen / Centre for Information Technology) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • John D. and Catherine T. MacArthur Foundation (R01 DA016558, R13-MH066849)
  • Bristol-Myers Squibb
  • Eli Lilly and Company
  • Pfizer
  • GlaxoSmithKline
  • Sanofi
  • World Health Organization
  • Kaiser Permanente
  • European Commission (QLG5–1999-01042, SANCO2004123, 2004123)
  • Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo
  • Generalitat de Catalunya (01042)
  • Shire
  • Jawaharlal Institute Of Postgraduate Medical Education and Research
  • Regione Piemonte (00/0028)
  • National Institutes of Health (5r13mh066849-04, 5r01mh069864-04, 5r01mh070884-05)
  • Pfizer Foundation (R01‐MH069864, R01-DA016558, R13-MH066849, R03-TW006481)
  • Pan American Health Organization
  • Instituto de Salud Carlos III (CB06/02/0046, CIBER CB06/02/0046, RETICS RD06/0011 REM-TAP, RETICS RD06/0011, RD06/0011, FIS 00/0028, CIBER CB06/02/0046)
  • Departament de Salut, Generalitat de Catalunya
  • National Institute of Mental Health (R13-MH-066849, R01‐MH070884, R01MH061905, R01MH059575, U01MH060220, R01‐MH069864)
  • National Institute on Drug Abuse (R01DA016558)
  • Fogarty International Center (FIRCA R03TW006481, R03TW006481)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Child Abuse and Trauma
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Mental Health Treatment and Access
Keywords
childhood adversity, adult psychopathology, mental illness, child abuse, child neglect, parental mental illness, family functioning, comorbidities, subadditivity, life course, cross-national comparison
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Mental Disorders, Child, Child Abuse, Child, Preschool, Crime, Epidemiologic Methods, Family Health, Family Relations, Humans, Life Change Events, Socioeconomic Factors, World Health Organization, Causality, Child of Impaired Parents, Age of Onset, Adult Survivors of Child Abuse, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review