Cited by 150Bariatric Surgery and OutcomesObesity and Health PracticesBody Contouring and Surgery

Patient and Referring Practitioner Characteristics Associated With the Likelihood of Undergoing Bariatric Surgery: A Systematic Review

Open access
Funk, Luke M., Jolles, Sally, Fischer, Laura E., Voils, Corrine I.·2015·JAMA Surgery

Abstract

IMPORTANCE: Although bariatric surgery is the most cost-effective treatment for severe obesity, less than 1% of severely obese patients undergo it. Reasons for this low use are unclear. OBJECTIVES: To identify patient and referring practitioner characteristics associated with the likelihood of undergoing bariatric surgery. EVIDENCE REVIEW: The PubMed, PsycINFO, CINAHL, and Cochrane databases were searched for articles published from January 1, 1998, through December 31, 2014. Studies were eligible if they presented descriptive data regarding facilitators or barriers to bariatric surgery or if they reported statistical associations between patient or practitioner characteristics and referral to or receipt of bariatric surgery. Frequency effect sizes were calculated as the proportion of studies reporting a finding. FINDINGS: Of the 7212 records identified in the initial search, 53 were included in full-text review. Nine studies met our inclusion criteria and were included in analyses. Of those, 4 included descriptive findings, 6 reported statistical associations, and 1 included both. One study included practitioners as participants, whereas 8 included patients. Four of 9 studies identified an association between female sex and a greater willingness to undergo bariatric surgery. Lack of knowledge about bariatric surgery was a barrier in 2 studies. Five of 9 cited patient concerns about the outcomes and safety of bariatric surgery as a barrier to undergoing it. Patients were more likely to pursue bariatric surgery when it was recommended by referring practitioners. Practitioners who believed that obesity treatment should be covered by insurance were more likely to recommend bariatric surgery. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: Limited patient and referring practitioner knowledge about the safety and effectiveness of bariatric surgery are important barriers to bariatric surgery use. Future efforts focused on improving knowledge and identification of the critical determinants of obesity treatment decision making from the practitioner and patient perspectives would have an important effect on public health.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1001/jamasurg.2015.1250

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Specific examples of bias and difficulty include gaps in referral to bariatric or metabolic surgery, with only <1% of qualified surgical candidates being referred for such operations.

    “Specific examples include gaps in referral to bariatric or metabolic surgery,66 with only <1% of qualified surgical candidates being referred for such operations,67”

    From Definition and diagnostic criteria of clinical obesity (2025) · cites this paper as [67]

    The Introduction (page not provided) says that fewer than 1% of severely obese U.S. adults undergo bariatric surgery annually; it does not say that fewer than 1% are referred. The Discussion (page not provided) identifies referral as a step toward surgery and calls for better understanding of referring-provider practices, but gives no referral rate. (LLM, conf=0.87)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 40

  1. [1]Chang SH Stoll CR Song J Varela JE Eagon CJ Colditz GA The Effectiveness and Risks of Bariatric Surgery: An Updated Systematic Review and Meta-analysis, 2003-2012. JAMA surgery 2013 PMC3962512 24352617
  2. [2]Sjostrom L Lindroos AK Peltonen M Lifestyle, diabetes, and cardiovascular risk factors 10 years after bariatric surgery. The New England journal of medicine 2004 351 2683 93 15616203
  3. [4]Christou NV Sampalis JS Liberman M Surgery decreases long-term mortality, morbidity, and health care use in morbidly obese patients. Annals of surgery 2004 240 416 23 discussion 23-4 15319713 PMC1356432
  4. [5]Ikramuddin S Korner J Lee WJ Roux-en-Y gastric bypass vs intensive medical management for the control of type 2 diabetes, hypertension, and hyperlipidemia: the Diabetes Surgery Study randomized clinical trial. JAMA: the journal of the American Medical Association 2013 309 2240 9 23736733 PMC3954742
  5. [8]Schauer PR Bhatt DL Kirwan JP Bariatric Surgery versus Intensive Medical Therapy for Diabetes - 3-Year Outcomes. The New England journal of medicine 2014 PMC5451259 24679060
  6. [9]Heshka S Anderson JW Atkinson RL Weight loss with self-help compared with a structured commercial program: a randomized trial. JAMA: the journal of the American Medical Association 2003 289 1792 8 12684357
  7. [10]Wang BC Furnback W Modelling the long-term outcomes of bariatric surgery: A review of cost-effectiveness studies. Best practice & research Clinical gastroenterology 2013 27 987 95 24182616
  8. [11]Maciejewski ML Livingston EH Smith VA Kahwati LC Henderson WG Arterburn DE Health expenditures among high-risk patients after gastric bypass and matched controls. Archives of surgery 2012 147 633 40 22802057
  9. [12]Cremieux PY Ledoux S Clerici C Cremieux F Buessing M The impact of bariatric surgery on comorbidities and medication use among obese patients. Obesity surgery 2010 20 861 70 20440579
  10. [13]Finkelstein EA Allaire BT Globe D Dixon JB The business case for bariatric surgery revisited: a non-randomized case-control study. PloS one 2013 8 e75498 24069423 PMC3777948
  11. [14]Myers VH McVay MA Adams CE Actual medical and pharmacy costs for bariatric surgery: 6-year follow-up. Southern medical journal 2012 105 530 7 23038484
  12. [15]Finkelstein EA DiBonaventura M Burgess SM Hale BC The costs of obesity in the workplace. Journal of occupational and environmental medicine / American College of Occupational and Environmental Medicine 2010 52 971 6 20881629
  13. [16]Sturm R Hattori A Morbid obesity rates continue to rise rapidly in the United States. International journal of obesity 2013 37 889 91 22986681 PMC3527647
  14. [17]Nguyen NT Masoomi H Magno CP Nguyen XM Laugenour K Lane J Trends in use of bariatric surgery, 2003-2008. Journal of the American College of Surgeons 2011 213 261 6 21624841
  15. [19]Jackson TD Zhang R Glockler D Health inequity in access to bariatric surgery: a protocol for a systematic review. Systematic reviews 2014 3 15 24559394 PMC3936930
  16. [20]Arterburn DE Olsen MK Smith VA Association between bariatric surgery and long-term survival. JAMA 2015 313 62 70 25562267
  17. [21]Zimmerman M Francione-Witt C Chelminski I Presurgical psychiatric evaluations of candidates for bariatric surgery, part 1: Reliability and reasons for and frequency of exclusion. J Clin Psychiatry 2007 68 1557 62 17960972
  18. [22]Mazzeo SE Saunders R Mitchell KS Binge eating among African American and Caucasian bariatric surgery candidates. Eating Behaviors 2005 6 189 96 15854865
  19. [23]Mazzeo SE Saunders R Mitchell KS Gender and binge eating among bariatric surgery candidates. Eating Behaviors 2006 7 47 52 16360622
  20. [24]Sandelowski M Barroso J Voils C Using qualitative metasummary to synthesize qualitative and quantitative descriptive findings. Res Nurs Health 2007 39 99 111 17243111 PMC2329806
  21. [25]Sandelowski M Voils C Barroso J Comparability work and the management of difference in research synthesis studies. Social Science & Medicine 2007 64 236 47 17029691 PMC2386987
  22. [26]Voils CI Sandelowski M Barroso J Hasselblad V Making Sense of Qualitative and Quantitative Findings in Mixed Research Synthesis Studies. Field methods 2008 20 3 25 18677415 PMC2493048
  23. [28]Arterburn D Westbrook EO Terrell A Weight control practices of severely obese patients who are not seeking bariatric surgery. Obesity 2013 21 1509 13 23613134
  24. [29]Ferrante JM Piasecki AK Ohman-Strickland PA Crabtree BF Family physicians' practices and attitudes regarding care of extremely obese patients. Obesity 2009 17 1710 6 19282824 PMC2953252
  25. [31]Khawali C Ferraz MB Zanella MT Ferreira SR Willingness to pay as patient preference to bariatric surgery. Health expectations: an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy 2014 17 73 81 22070389 PMC5060693
  26. [32]Pitzul KB Jackson T Crawford S Understanding disposition after referral for bariatric surgery: when and why patients referred do not undergo surgery. Obes Surg 2014 24 134 40 24122658
  27. [33]Sivagnaman P Rhodes M Provision of bariatric surgery in Norfolk. British Journal of Healthcare Management 2008 14 186 90
  28. [34]Sarwer DB Ritter S Wadden TA Spitzer JC Vetter ML Moore RH Attitudes about the safety and efficacy of bariatric surgery among patients with type 2 diabetes and a body mass index of 30-40 kg/m2. Surg Obes Relat Dis 2013 9 630 5 23260805 PMC3866014
  29. [35]Afonso BB Rosenthal R Li KM Zapatier J Szomstein S Perceived barriers to bariatric surgery among morbidly obese patients. Surg Obes Relat Dis 2010 6 16 21 20005784
  30. [36]Lynch CS Chang JC Ford AF Ibrahim SA Obese African-American women's perspectives on weight loss and bariatric surgery. J Gen Intern Med 2007 22 908 14 17447097 PMC2583799
  31. [37]Birkmeyer NJ Gu N Race, socioeconomic status, and the use of bariatric surgery in Michigan. Obes Surg 2012 22 259 65 20559894
  32. [38]Pratt GM Learn CA Hughes GD Clark BL Warthen M Pories W Demographics and outcomes at American Society for Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery Centers of Excellence. Surgical endoscopy 2009 23 795 9 19184200
  33. [39]Sudan R Nguyen NT Hutter MM Brethauer SA Ponce J Morton JM Morbidity, mortality, and weight loss outcomes after reoperative bariatric surgery in the USA. Journal of gastrointestinal surgery: official journal of the Society for Surgery of the Alimentary Tract 2015 19 171 9 25186073
  34. [40]Ingraham AM Cohen ME Ko CY Hall BL A current profile and assessment of north american cholecystectomy: results from the american college of surgeons national surgical quality improvement program. Journal of the American College of Surgeons 2010 211 176 86 20670855
  35. [41]Niebisch S Fleming FJ Galey KM Perioperative risk of laparoscopic fundoplication: safer than previously reported-analysis of the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program 2005 to 2009. Journal of the American College of Surgeons 2012 215 61 8 discussion 8-9 22578304
  36. [42]Wee CC Davis RB Huskey KW Jones DB Hamel MB Quality of life among obese patients seeking weight loss surgery: the importance of obesity-related social stigma and functional status. J Gen Intern Med 2013 28 231 8 22956443 PMC3614124
  37. [44]Sikorski C Luppa M Dame K Attitudes towards bariatric surgery in the general public. Obes Surg 2013 23 338 45 22983771
  38. [45]Thuan JF Avignon A Obesity management: Attitudes and practices of French general practitioners in a region of France. Int J Obes 2005 29 1100 6 15925948
  39. [46]Tsuda S Barrios L Schneider B Jones DB Factors affecting rejection of bariatric patients from an academic weight loss program. Surg Obes Relat Dis 2009 5 199 202 19136316
  40. [47]Sansone RA McDonald S Wiederman MW Ferreira K Gastric bypass surgery: A survey of primary care physicians. Eating Disorders: The Journal of Treatment & Prevention 2007 15 145 52 17454073

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Funk, L. M., Jolles, S., Fischer, L. E., & Voils, C. I.
Affiliations
  • University of Wisconsin–Madison (US)
  • Duke Medical Center (US)
Venue
JAMA Surgery
Published
2015-10-01
Volume
150
Issue
10
Pages
999
ISSN
2168-6254 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1624701774
Cited by
150
References
5
Citations by year
2026: 11 · 2025: 15 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 16 · 2022: 23 · 2021: 18 · 2020: 12 · 2019: 17 · 2018: 12 · 2017: 10 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 4
FWCI
10.42
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • JAMA Surgery (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health (UL1TR000427)
  • National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Bariatric Surgery and Outcomes
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Pharmacy › Obesity and Health Practices
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Body Contouring and Surgery
Keywords
bariatric surgery, morbid obesity, barriers to surgery, patient characteristics, sex differences, patient knowledge, insurance coverage, treatment decision-making, patient safety concerns
MeSH terms
Female, Humans, Male, Obesity, Morbid, Referral and Consultation, Bariatric Surgery

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review