Cited by 39Obesity and Health PracticesObesity, Physical Activity, DietHealth Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life

Sex, Race, and the Adverse Effects of Social Stigma vs. Other Quality of Life Factors Among Primary Care Patients with Moderate to Severe Obesity

Open access
Wee, Christina C., Davis, Roger B., Chiodi, Sarah, Huskey, Karen W., Hamel, Mary B.·2015·Journal of General Internal Medicine

Abstract

Background Patients with obesity face widespread social bias, but the importance of this social stigma to patients relative to other quality of life (QOL) factors is unclear.Objective Our aim was to examine the importance of obesity-related social stigma relative to other QOL factors on reducing patients' overall well-being.Design We used a cross-sectional telephone interview.Setting The study was conducted at four diverse primary care practices in Greater Boston.Participants Three hundred and thirty-seven primary care patients aged 18-65 years and with a body mass index (BMI) of 35 kg/m(2) or higher participated in the study.Main measures Patients' health utility (preference-based QOL measure) was determined via responses to a series of standard gamble scenarios assessing willingness to risk death to lose various amounts of weight or to achieve perfect health. We used the Impact of Weight on Quality of Life-lite instrument to assess QOL domains specific to obesity (physical function, self-esteem, sexual life, public distress or social stigma, and work), and we examined variation in utility explained by these domains.Key results Depending on patients' race/ethnicity, mean health utilities ranged from 0.92 to 0.99 among men and from 0.89 to 0.93 among women. After adjustment for race, BMI, and education, none of the QOL domains explained much of the variation in utility among men, except for work function among Hispanic men. In contrast, social stigma was the leading QOL contributor to utility for Caucasian women (explaining 6 % of the marginal variation beyond demographics and BMI). In contrast, sexual function was the most important contributor among African American women (3 % marginal variation), and work life was most important among Hispanic women (> 20 % in variation). Lower scores in one domain did not always translate into lower well-being. Moreover, QOL summary scores often explained less of the variation than some individual domains.Conclusion Obesity-related social stigma had disproportionate adverse effects on Caucasian women patients' well-being, whereas weight-related impairment in work function was particularly important among Hispanic patients and impaired sexual function was important to diminished well-being among African American women although its impact appeared modest.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s11606-014-3041-4

Cites

22 of 22 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Some researchers found no association between obesity and aspects of PPWB (positive affect, happiness, self-esteem).

    “Still some researchers found no association between obesity and aspects of PPWB (positive affect, happiness, self‐esteem). 44 , 50 , 61”

    From Positive psychological well-being in women with obesity: A scoping review of qualitative and quantitative primary research (2022) · cites this paper as [44]

    The Introduction (page unavailable) says patients with obesity often report lower quality of life in domains including self-esteem—the opposite of the attributed finding for that domain. The Results examine differences among patients with moderate to severe obesity, not an absence of association between obesity and positive affect or happiness. (LLM, conf=0.83)

    Checked by a reasoning model — may be wrong.

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 23 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Wee, C. C., Davis, R. B., Chiodi, S., Huskey, K. W., & Hamel, M. B.
Affiliations
Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center (US)
Corresponding author
Wee, Christina C.
Venue
Journal of General Internal Medicine
Published
2014-10-24
Volume
30
Issue
2
Pages
229-235
ISSN
  • 0884-8734 (ISSN-L)
  • 1525-1497
OpenAlex
W1990304218
Cited by
39
References
23
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 4
FWCI
13.24
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of General Internal Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health
  • National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (K24DK087932, R01DK073302)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Pharmacy › Obesity and Health Practices
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Obesity, Physical Activity, Diet
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life
Keywords
obesity, social stigma, quality of life, health utility, sex differences, racial and ethnic differences, sexual function, work function, self-esteem, primary care patients, well-being
MeSH terms
Adult, Cross-Sectional Studies, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Obesity, Obesity, Morbid, Primary Health Care, Quality of Life, Sexual Behavior, Racial Groups, Social Stigma

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review