CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 176Breast Cancer Treatment StudiesGlobal Cancer Incidence and ScreeningBreast Lesions and Carcinomas

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 35 of the 37 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Initial Surgery and Survival in Stage IV Breast Cancer in the United States, 1988-2011

Open access
Thomas, Alexandra, Khan, Seema A., Chrischilles, Elizabeth A., Schroeder, Mary C.·2016·JAMA Surgery
DOI 10.1001/jamasurg.2015.4539PMC PMC5844269
Open this paper in CoChat — free accountOpen PDF

Abstract

IMPORTANCE: Management of the primary tumor site in patients with metastatic breast cancer remains controversial. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the patterns of receipt of initial breast surgery for female patients with stage IV breast cancer in the United States, with particular attention to women who survived at least 10 years. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: A retrospective cohort study using data from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) program. Female patients diagnosed as having stage IV breast cancer between 1988 and 2011 and who did not receive radiation therapy as part of the first course of treatment were included (N = 21 372). Kaplan-Meier estimates of median survival and descriptive statistics were used to compare patient and tumor characteristics by receipt of breast surgery at diagnosis. A Royston-Parmar survival model and logistic regression analysis assessed demographic and clinical factors associated with survival and prolonged survival (of at least 10 years). MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: Differences in survival, particularly survival of at least 10 years, by receipt of initial surgery to the primary tumor. RESULTS: Among the 21 372 patients, the median survival increased from 20 months (1988-1991) to 26 months (2007-2011). During this time, the rate of surgery declined (odds ratio [OR], 0.16; 95% CI, 0.12-0.21). Even so, receipt of surgery was associated with improved survival in multivariate analysis, which controlled for patient and clinical characteristics, along with time period (hazard ratio, 0.60; 95% CI, 0.57-0.63). For women diagnosed as having cancer before 2002 (n = 7504), survival of at least 10 years was seen in 9.6% (n = 353) and 2.9% (n = 107) of those who did and did not receive surgery, respectively (OR, 3.61; 95% CI, 2.89-4.50). In multivariate analysis, survival of at least 10 years was associated with receipt of surgery (odds ratio, 2.80; 95% CI, 2.08-3.77), hormone receptor-positive disease (OR, 1.76; 95% CI, 1.25-2.48), older age (OR, 0.41; 95% CI, 0.32-0.54), larger tumor size (OR, 0.37; 95% CI, 0.27-0.51), marital status of being separated at the time of diagnosis (OR, 0.67; 95% CI, 0.51-0.88), and more recent year of diagnosis (OR, 1.43; 95% CI, 1.02-1.99). CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: Survival in stage IV breast cancer has improved and is increasingly of prolonged duration, particularly for some women undergoing initial breast surgery. As systemic therapy advances provide better control of distant disease in stage IV breast cancer, and as women present with lower distant disease burdens, these findings on initial surgery to the primary tumor may be of importance.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1001/jamasurg.2015.4539

Cites

35 of 35 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

2 of the 37 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 176

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
Thomas, A., Khan, S. A., Chrischilles, E. A., & Schroeder, M. C.
Affiliations
  • University of Iowa (US)
  • Northwestern University (US)
Corresponding author
Schroeder, Mary C.
ORCID
Venue
JAMA Surgery
Publisher
American Medical Association (AMA)
Published
2016-05-01
Volume
151
Issue
5
Pages
424
ISSN
2168-6254 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.1001/jamasurg.2015.4539
PMC
PMC5844269
OpenAlex
W2185644057
Cited by
176
References
37
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 12 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 18 · 2022: 23 · 2021: 21 · 2020: 30 · 2019: 14 · 2018: 14 · 2017: 16 · 2016: 9
FWCI
4.41
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • JAMA Surgery (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
National Cancer Institute (P30CA086862)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cancer Research › Breast Cancer Treatment Studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Global Cancer Incidence and Screening
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pathology and Forensic Medicine › Breast Lesions and Carcinomas
Keywords
metastatic breast cancer, primary tumor resection, long-term survival, patterns of care, SEER, prognostic factors, racial disparities in treatment, regional variation in treatment, health insurance status
MeSH terms
Age Factors, Aged, Breast Neoplasms, Humans, Middle Aged, Neoplasm Metastasis, Neoplasm Staging, Receptors, Estrogen, Receptors, Progesterone, Retrospective Studies, United States, Survival Rate, Marital Status, SEER Program, Tumor Burden, Kaplan-Meier Estimate

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review