Cited by 6Innovations in Medical EducationSurgical Simulation and TrainingAnatomy and Medical Technology

Moving Toward Every Patient Training for Surgery

Fry, Brian T., Hallway, Alexander, Englesbe, Michael J.·2018·JAMA Surgery

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1001/jamasurg.2018.1658

Cites

6 of 6 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Fry, B. T., Hallway, A., & Englesbe, M. J.
Affiliations
  • University of Michigan (US)
  • Michigan Surgical and Health Optimization Program, Ann Arbor
Venue
JAMA Surgery
Published
2018-12-01
Volume
153
Issue
12
Pages
1089
ISSN
2168-6254 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2892334505
Cited by
6
References
6
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 2
FWCI
1.20
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • JAMA Surgery (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Innovations in Medical Education
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Surgical Simulation and Training
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Anatomy and Medical Technology
Keywords
patient education, surgical patients, patient training, shared decision-making, patient-centered care
MeSH terms
Clinical Competence, Education, Medical, Graduate, Humans, Neoplasms, Nutritional Status

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review