Progression vs Cyst Stability of Branch-Duct Intraductal Papillary Mucinous Neoplasms After Observation and Surgery
Open accessAbstract
Importance: The progression of intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms (IPMNs) of the pancreas to malignant disease is still poorly understood. Observational and surgical series have failed to provide comprehensive information. Objective: To identify dynamic variables associated with the development of malignant neoplasms by combining pathological features with data from preoperative repeated observations. Design, Setting, and Participants: The Crossover Observational Multicentric Study included a retrospective cohort of patients with branch-duct IPMNs (BD IPMNs) enrolled in a surveillance program from January 1, 2000, to December 31, 2019. Patients were enrolled from 5 referral centers: the Pancreas Institute, Verona, Italy; Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, South Korea; Singapore General Hospital, Singapore; Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland; and University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston. Patients underwent a minimum of 12 months of preoperative surveillance (median, 37 [interquartile range (IQR), 20-68] months). Main Outcomes and Measures: Dynamic variables associated with malignant disease were explored to estimate the presence of high-grade dysplasia (HGD) and invasive cancer at final pathological examination. Results: A total of 292 patients were included in the analysis (137 women [46.9%] and 155 men [53.1%]; median age, 64 [IQR, 56-71] years). During surveillance, 27 patients (9.2%) developed a worrisome feature after 5 years, and 46 of 276 (16.7%) developed high-risk stigmata (HRS). At final pathological evaluation, 107 patients (36.6%) had HGD or invasive cancer, and 16 (5.5%) had IPMNs with concomitant pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma. Rates of HGD and invasive cancer at pathological evaluation significantly differed between those without worrisome features and those developing HRS from a previous worrisome feature (9 [27.3%] vs 13 [61.9%]; P < .001). Developing an additional worrisome feature during surveillance (odds ratio [OR], 3.24 [95% CI, 1.38-7.60]; P = .007) or an HRS from a baseline worrisome feature (OR, 2.87 [95% CI, 1.01-8.17]; P = .048) was associated with HGD at final pathological evaluation. Among HRS, development of jaundice on a low-risk cyst was independently associated with invasive cancer (OR, 16.04 [95% CI, 2.94-87.40]; P = .001). Conclusions and Relevance: These findings suggest that in BD IPMNs under surveillance, harboring a stable worrisome feature carries the lowest risk of malignant disease. Development of additional worrisome features or HRS is associated with the presence of HGD, whereas the occurrence of jaundice is associated with invasive cancer.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Approximately 42-63% of resected IPMNs were found to have only low-grade dysplasia.
“While the goal of surgery is to resect lesions with advanced neoplasia (high-grade dysplasia and/or adenocarcinoma), approximately 42–63% of resected IPMNs were found to have only low-grade dysplasia [12,13,14,15,16,17].”
From Artificial Intelligence in the Diagnosis and Treatment of Pancreatic Cystic Lesions and Adenocarcinoma (2023) · cites this paper as [17]
Cites
European evidence-based guidelines on pancreatic cystic neoplasms
The European Study Group on Cystic Tumours of the Pancreas (2018) · Gut · doi:10.1136/gutjnl-2018-316027 · Cited by 1,417 · see citing works
Tanaka, M. (2018) · Pancreas · doi:10.1097/mpa.0000000000001047 · Cited by 76 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Jiang, J., Chao, W.-L., Culp, S., & Krishna, S. G. (2023) · Cancers · doi:10.3390/cancers15092410 · Cited by 38 · see citing works
- Authors
- Marchegiani, G., Pollini, T., Andrianello, S., Tomasoni, G., Biancotto, M., Javed, A. A., Kinny-Köster, B., Amini, N., Han, Y., Kim, H., Kwon, W., Kim, M., Perri, G., He, J., Bassi, C., Goh, B. K., Katz, M. H., Jang, J.-Y., Wolfgang, C., & Salvia, R.
- Affiliations
- University of Verona (IT)
- Johns Hopkins University (US)
- Department of Surgery, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland
- Seoul National University (KR)
- The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center (US)
- Singapore General Hospital (SG)
- Corresponding author
- Marchegiani, Giovanni
- ORCID
- Venue
- JAMA Surgery
- Publisher
- American Medical Association (AMA)
- Published
- 2021-07-01
- Volume
- 156
- Issue
- 7
- Pages
- 654
- ISSN
- 2168-6254 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC8135059
- OpenAlex
- W3160188357
- Cited by
- 63
- References
- 2
- Citations by year
- 2026: 6 · 2025: 13 · 2024: 16 · 2023: 18 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 4
- FWCI
- 4.01
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
- Locations
- JAMA Surgery (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Padua Research Archive (University of Padova) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Pancreatic and Hepatic Oncology Research
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Neuroendocrine Tumor Research Advances
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Salivary Gland Tumors Diagnosis and Treatment
- Keywords
- branch duct intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasm, pancreatic cysts, cyst progression, high-grade dysplasia, invasive cancer, pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma, surveillance (medicine), high-risk stigmata, pancreatic cancer risk stratification, pancreatic resection, pancreaticoduodenectomy
- MeSH terms
- Pancreatic Intraductal Neoplasms, Aged, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Neoplasm Invasiveness, Pancreatectomy, Pancreatic Neoplasms, Cohort Studies, Pancreaticoduodenectomy, Cross-Over Studies, Watchful Waiting
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review