Cited by 77Social Media in Health EducationHealth, Medicine and SocietyEthics and bioethics in healthcare

Professional Guidelines for Social Media Use: A Starting Point

Terry Kind·2015·AMA Journal of Ethics

Abstract

Farnan JM, Snyder Sulmasy L, Worster BK, et al. Online medical professionalism: patient and public relationships: policy statement from the American College of Physicians and the Federation of State Medical Boards. Ann Intern Med. 2013;158(8):620-627.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1001/journalofethics.2015.17.5.nlit1-1505

Cites

12 of 12 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Guidelines for social media use are available from numerous professional societies, and a recent review about available guidelines from nine medical international bodies has been published.

    “Guidelines are also available from numerous professional societies [171-178], and a recent review about available guidelines from nine medical international bodies has been published [179].”
  • The ACP-FSMB guidelines on Online Medical Professionalism state that guidelines are a baseline and starting point which needs to be evolved or restructured timely by adopting advanced technologies and emerging with best practices.

    “The American College of Physicians-Federations of State Medical Boards (ACP-FSMB) guidelines on Online Medical Professionalism state that guidelines are a baseline and starting point which needs to be evolved or restructured timely by parallelly adopting advanced technologies and eventually emerging with best practices [2].”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Kind, T.
Affiliations
George Washington University (US)
Corresponding author
Terry Kind
Venue
AMA Journal of Ethics
Published
2015-05-01
Volume
17
Issue
5
Pages
441-447
ISSN
  • 1937-7010 (ISSN-L)
  • 2376-6980
OpenAlex
W251807254
Cited by
77
References
12
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 12 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 12 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 6 · 2015: 2
FWCI
7.07
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • The AMA Journal of Ethic (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Health › Social Media in Health Education
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Health, Medicine and Society
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Ethics and bioethics in healthcare
Keywords
social media use, medical professionalism, physician-patient relationship, online professional conduct, American College of Physicians, Federation of State Medical Boards
MeSH terms
Attitude of Health Personnel, Humans, Physician-Patient Relations, Public Relations, United States, Practice Guidelines as Topic, Professional Misconduct, Blogging, Social Media

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review