Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 513

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Annals of Neurology

Open access
·2006·Annals of Neurology

Abstract

Objective: Memory impairment is a frequent comorbidity of focal epilepsy, incompletely explained by seizure frequency or structural pathology.Ictal and postictal hippocampal dysfunction disrupt memory processes, but their cumulative impact remains poorly quantified.This study introduces cumulative hippocampal seizure-related burden metrics and examines their association with long-term memory consolidation.Methods: A total of 20 consecutive patients undergoing stereo-electroencephalography in Marseille (2016-2018) were prospectively included.Continuous stereo-electroencephalogram recordings between 2 memory assessments (30 minutes and 1 week postencoding) were analyzed.Hippocampal ictal involvement and durations were assessed using epileptogenicity markers and visual stereo-electroencephalogram analysis.The postictal period was quantified using permutation entropy.Cumulative hippocampal seizure-related burden metrics (ictal, postictal, and combined) were computed across hippocampus-involving ictal events.Verbal and visual memory were assessed using standardized recall and recognition tasks.One-week performance was defined as the percentage score obtained at the 1-week assessment, whereas retention was defined as 1-week performance expressed as a percentage of 30-min performance.Associations were examined using univariate and multivariate analyses.Results: Higher dominant-hemisphere hippocampal burden was associated with poorer 1-week verbal memory (performance and retention), independently of most covariates.Higher cumulative hippocampal seizure-related burden was associated with lower total recall performance (free + cued) and total recall retention (β = À25.04 and À23.88; R 2 = 0.57 and 0.53; p < 0.05), and accounted for the greatest variance in both outcomes (adjusted R 2 = 0.59 and 0.53; β = À25.45 and À24.27; p < 0.01), particularly when adjusting for epilepsy duration.No robust associations were observed between nondominant-hemisphere hippocampal seizure-related burden metrics and visual memory.Effects predominantly involved recall.Interpretation: Cumulative ictal-postictal hippocampal dysfunction is a major predictor of impaired long-term verbal memory consolidation in focal epilepsy.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/(issn)1531-8249

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 513

Metadata

Venue
Annals of Neurology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2006-03-10
ISSN
  • 0364-5134 (ISSN-L)
  • 1531-8249
OpenAlex
W4240271001
Cited by
513
References
0
Type
paratext
Language
en
Open access
gold

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Annals of Neurology. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/(issn)1531-8249
The paper
Annals of Neurology. (2006). Annals of Neurology. https://doi.org/10.1002/(issn)1531-8249

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.