Cited by 431Dementia and Cognitive Impairment ResearchAlzheimer's disease research and treatmentsMedical Imaging Techniques and Applications

Assessing Synaptic Density in Alzheimer Disease With Synaptic Vesicle Glycoprotein 2A Positron Emission Tomographic Imaging

Open access
Chen, Ming-Kai, Mecca, Adam P., Naganawa, Mika, Finnema, Sjoerd J., Toyonaga, Takuya, Lin, Shu-fei, Najafzadeh, Soheila, Ropchan, Jim +8 more·2018·JAMA Neurology

Abstract

Importance: Synaptic loss is well established as the major structural correlate of cognitive impairment in Alzheimer disease (AD). The ability to measure synaptic density in vivo could accelerate the development of disease-modifying treatments for AD. Synaptic vesicle glycoprotein 2A is an essential vesicle membrane protein expressed in virtually all synapses and could serve as a suitable target for synaptic density. Objective: To compare hippocampal synaptic vesicle glycoprotein 2A (SV2A) binding in participants with AD and cognitively normal participants using positron emission tomographic (PET) imaging. Design, Setting, and Participants: This cross-sectional study recruited 10 participants with AD and 11 participants who were cognitively normal between November 2015 and June 2017. We hypothesized a reduction in hippocampal SV2A binding in AD, based on the early degeneration of entorhinal cortical cell projections to the hippocampus (via the perforant path) and hippocampal SV2A reductions that had been observed in postmortem studies. Participants underwent high-resolution PET scanning with ((R)-1-((3-(11C-methyl-11C)pyridin-4-yl)methyl)-4-(3,4,5-trifluorophenyl)pyrrolidin-2-one), a compound more commonly known as 11C-UCB-J, for SV2A. They also underwent high-resolution PET scanning with carbon 11-labeled Pittsburgh Compound B (11C-PiB) for β-amyloid, magnetic resonance imaging, and cognitive and neurologic evaluation. Main Outcomes and Measures: Outcomes were 11C-UCB-J-specific binding (binding potential [BPND]) via PET imaging in brain regions of interest in participants with AD and participants who were cognitively normal. Results: Ten participants with AD (5 male and 5 female; mean [SD] age, 72.7 [6.3] years; 10 [100%] β-amyloid positive) were compared with 11 participants who were cognitively normal (5 male and 6 female; mean [SD] age, 72.9 [8.7] years; 11 [100%] β-amyloid negative). Participants with AD spanned the disease stages from amnestic mild cognitive impairment (n = 5) to mild dementia (n = 5). Participants with AD had significant reduction in hippocampal SV2A specific binding (41%) compared with cognitively normal participants, as assessed by 11C-UCB-J-PET BPND (cognitively normal participants: mean [SD] BPND, 1.47 [0.37]; participants with AD: 0.87 [0.50]; P = .005). These reductions remained significant after correction for atrophy (ie, partial volume correction; participants who were cognitively normal: mean [SD], 2.71 [0.46]; participants with AD: 2.15 [0.55]; P = .02). Hippocampal SV2A-specific binding BPND was correlated with a composite episodic memory score in the overall sample (R = 0.56; P = .01). Conclusions and Relevance: To our knowledge, this is the first study to investigate synaptic density in vivo in AD using 11C-UCB-J-PET imaging. This approach may provide a direct measure of synaptic density, and it therefore holds promise as an in vivo biomarker for AD and as an outcome measure for trials of disease-modifying therapies, particularly those targeted at the preservation and restoration of synapses.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1001/jamaneurol.2018.1836

Cites

47 of 47 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In a study comparing 11 controls with 10 AD, 11C-UCBJ PET showed reduction in hippocampal binding in keeping with neuropathological findings in AD.

    “One of the first studies in 11C -UCBJ PET comparing 11 controls with 10 AD showed reduction in hippocampal binding in keeping with neuropathological findings in AD [203].”
  • Quantification of radiotracer binding to SV2A does correlate with measures of synaptic vesicle number and expression of other pre-synaptic proteins classically used in postmortem and in vitro work.

    “quantification of radiotracer binding to SV2A does correlate with measures of synaptic vesicle number [8,9,69,70] and expression of other pre-synaptic proteins classically used in postmortem and in vitro work (e.g., synaptophysin, synapsin).”
  • PET studies have found lower cerebral SV2A density in patients with several neuropsychiatric disorders linked to synaptic dysfunction, including depression, compared to healthy individuals.

    “PET studies on several neuropsychiatric disorders linked to synaptic dysfunction, including depression, have found lower cerebral SV2A density in patients compared to healthy individuals [17–22].”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Chen, M.-K., Mecca, A. P., Naganawa, M., Finnema, S. J., Toyonaga, T., Lin, S.-F., Najafzadeh, S., Ropchan, J., Lu, Y., McDonald, J. W., Michalak, H. R., Nabulsi, N. B., Arnsten, A. F. T., Huang, Y., Carson, R. E., & van Dyck, C. H.
Affiliations
  • Yale University (US)
  • Department of Psychiatry, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut
Corresponding author
Chen, Ming-Kai
Venue
JAMA Neurology
Published
2018-10-01
Volume
75
Issue
10
Pages
1215
ISSN
2168-6149 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2883737562
Cited by
431
References
47
Citations by year
2026: 30 · 2025: 50 · 2024: 58 · 2023: 47 · 2022: 61 · 2021: 70 · 2020: 66 · 2019: 40 · 2018: 8
FWCI
36.20
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • JAMA Neurology (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Institute on Aging (R01AG052560, K23AG057794, P50AG047270)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Alzheimer's disease research and treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Medical Imaging Techniques and Applications
Keywords
Alzheimer's disease, synaptic density, SV2A, [11C]UCB-J, hippocampus, positron emission tomography, binding potential, amyloid-beta, Pittsburgh compound B, perforant path, entorhinal cortex, synaptic loss, cognitive impairment, amnestic mild cognitive impairment, mild dementia, disease-modifying therapy
MeSH terms
Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Aging, Alzheimer Disease, Amnesia, Cross-Sectional Studies, Female, Hippocampus, Humans, Male, Membrane Glycoproteins, Nerve Tissue Proteins, Pyridines, Pyrrolidinones, Synapses, Biomarkers, Positron-Emission Tomography, Cognitive Dysfunction, Memory, Episodic

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review