The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Wildlife Society Bulletin
Open accessAbstract
We compared 66 studies that measured the effectiveness of lethal and non-lethal techniques for reducing large carnivore attacks on livestock. Preventive husbandry and deterrents demonstrated the greatest effectiveness but widest variability while lethal removal showed moderate effectiveness with the lowest variation; however, more studies with consistent metrics of effectiveness are needed to overcome publication biases toward Canids in the United States, Europe, and Africa and studies reporting positive effects.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
The Economic Value of Ecological Services Provided by Insects
LOSEY, J. E., & VAUGHAN, M. (2006) · BioScience · doi:10.1641/0006-3568(2006)56[311:tevoes]2.0.co;2 · Cited by 1,942
An Agenda for Purely Confirmatory Research
Wagenmakers, E.-J., Wetzels, R., Borsboom, D., van der Maas, H. L. J., & Kievit, R. A. (2012) · Perspectives on Psychological Science · doi:10.1177/1745691612463078 · Cited by 1,042
Kebritchi, M., Lipschuetz, A., & Santiague, L. (2017) · Journal of Educational Technology Systems · doi:10.1177/0047239516661713 · Cited by 967
Rethinking Internal Consistency in Cronbach’s Alpha
Vaske, J. J., Beaman, J., & Sponarski, C. C. (2017) · Leisure Sciences · doi:10.1080/01490400.2015.1127189 · Cited by 856
Wolves and the Ecology of Fear: Can Predation Risk Structure Ecosystems?
RIPPLE, W. J., & BESCHTA, R. L. (2004) · BioScience · doi:10.1641/0006-3568(2004)054[0755:wateof]2.0.co;2 · Cited by 813
Metadata
- Venue
- Wildlife Society Bulletin
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2011-03-30
- ISSN
- 0091-7648 (ISSN-L)
- 1938-5463
- OpenAlex
- W4233803403
- Cited by
- 5,545
- References
- 0
- Type
- paratext
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Wildlife Society Bulletin. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/(issn)1938-5463a
- The paper
- Wildlife Society Bulletin. (2011). Wildlife Society Bulletin. https://doi.org/10.1002/(issn)1938-5463a
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
