Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 2,522

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Journal of Business Logistics

Open access
·2018·Journal of Business Logistics

Abstract

This research investigates how organizations can attain and maintain the legitimacy of their environmental sustainability leadership over time.Utilizing data from the corporate sustainability reports of a global sustainability leader, this research analyzes a company's efforts to secure moral, cognitive, and pragmatic legitimacy in the eyes of its evaluators at the macro level.Adopting a template analysis approach and building on prior research on corporate sustainability reporting, this research examines the temporal shifts in IBM's (International Business Machines Corporation) sustainability commitments, with a focus on its sustainable supply chain management (SSCM).This research advances comprehension of legitimacy theory through theory elaboration by navigating the intersection of empirical data and existing literature.It posits that the construct of authenticity serves as a pivotal link between an organization's SSCM and its attainment of sustainable supply chain legitimacy at the macro level.Furthermore, organizations seeking to attain and maintain legitimacy must continually adapt to evolving expectations from external evaluators.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/(issn)2158-1592

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 2,522

Metadata

Venue
Journal of Business Logistics
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2018-08-03
ISSN
0735-3766 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4231671316
Cited by
2,522
References
0
Type
paratext
Language
en
Open access
gold

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Journal of Business Logistics. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/(issn)2158-1592
The paper
Journal of Business Logistics. (2018). Journal of Business Logistics. https://doi.org/10.1002/(issn)2158-1592

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.