Broca's region revisited: Cytoarchitecture and intersubject variability
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Differences in the laminar receptor distribution patterns of AMPA and M1 receptors argue for a subdivision of area 44 into a ventral and dorsal part extending earlier cytoarchitectonic findings.
“Differences in the laminar receptor distribution patterns of AMPA and M1 receptors argue for a subdivision of area 44 into a ventral and dorsal part extending earlier cytoarchitectonic findings [26].”
From Broca's Region: Novel Organizational Principles and Multiple Receptor Mapping (2010) · cites this paper as [26]
BA44 and BA45 are differentiated in cyto-architecture, receptor-architecture, structural/functional connectivity, and function.
“given the well-established differentiation between these two regions in terms of cyto-architecture (Amunts et al., 1999), receptor-architecture (Amunts et al., 2010), structural/functional connectivity (Anwander et al., 2006; Margulies and Petrides, 2013) and, more importantly, function (Gough et al., 2005; Klaus and Hartwigsen, 2019)”
From Damage to Broca’s area does not contribute to long-term speech production outcome after stroke (2021) · cites this paper as Amunts et al., 1999
No citation lists for this paper
No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.
- Authors
- Amunts, K., Schleicher, A., B�rgel, U., Mohlberg, H., Uylings, H. B. M., & Zilles, K.
- Venue
- The Journal of Comparative Neurology
- Published
- 1999
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
