Cited by 150Neurobiology of Language and BilingualismHemispheric Asymmetry in NeuroscienceLanguage Development and Disorders

Damage to Broca’s area does not contribute to long-term speech production outcome after stroke

Open access
Gajardo-Vidal, Andrea, Lorca-Puls, Diego L, team, PLORAS, Warner, Holly, Pshdary, Bawan, Crinion, Jennifer T, Leff, Alexander P, Hope, Thomas M H +5 more·2021·Brain

Abstract

Broca’s area in the posterior half of the left inferior frontal gyrus has long been thought to be critical for speech production. The current view is that long-term speech production outcome in patients with Broca’s area damage is best explained by the combination of damage to Broca’s area and neighbouring regions including the underlying white matter, which was also damaged in Paul Broca’s two historic cases. Here, we dissociate the effect of damage to Broca’s area from the effect of damage to surrounding areas by studying long-term speech production outcome in 134 stroke survivors with relatively circumscribed left frontal lobe lesions that spared posterior speech production areas in lateral inferior parietal and superior temporal association cortices. Collectively, these patients had varying degrees of damage to one or more of nine atlas-based grey or white matter regions: Brodmann areas 44 and 45 (together known as Broca’s area), ventral premotor cortex, primary motor cortex, insula, putamen, the anterior segment of the arcuate fasciculus, uncinate fasciculus and frontal aslant tract. Spoken picture description scores from the Comprehensive Aphasia Test were used as the outcome measure. Multiple regression analyses allowed us to tease apart the contribution of other variables influencing speech production abilities such as total lesion volume and time post-stroke. We found that, in our sample of patients with left frontal damage, long-term speech production impairments (lasting beyond 3 months post-stroke) were solely predicted by the degree of damage to white matter, directly above the insula, in the vicinity of the anterior part of the arcuate fasciculus, with no contribution from the degree of damage to Broca’s area (as confirmed with Bayesian statistics). The effect of white matter damage cannot be explained by a disconnection of Broca’s area, because speech production scores were worse after damage to the anterior arcuate fasciculus with relative sparing of Broca’s area than after damage to Broca’s area with relative sparing of the anterior arcuate fasciculus. Our findings provide evidence for three novel conclusions: (i) Broca’s area damage does not contribute to long-term speech production outcome after left frontal lobe strokes; (ii) persistent speech production impairments after damage to the anterior arcuate fasciculus cannot be explained by a disconnection of Broca’s area; and (iii) the prior association between persistent speech production impairments and Broca’s area damage can be explained by co-occurring white matter damage, above the insula, in the vicinity of the anterior part of the arcuate fasciculus.

AI snapshot

Written from the paper’s full text.

TL;DR

In 134 stroke survivors with relatively circumscribed left frontal lobe lesions, long-term speech production outcome was predicted by damage to white matter above the insula near the anterior arcuate fasciculus, not by damage to Broca’s area. The authors conclude that the prior association between Broca’s area damage and persistent speech production impairments can be explained by co-occurring damage to this white matter region.

Key findings

  • In multiple regression Model 2, only lesion load in the anterior arcuate fasciculus (aAF) significantly predicted spoken picture description scores (P = 0.008), whereas BA44 did not (P = 0.567); the model accounted for R² = 0.515.
  • Bayesian analysis gave BF = 0.116 for BA44, interpreted as more than eight times stronger evidence for the null than the alternative, and BF = 4.389 for aAF, interpreted as more than four times stronger evidence for the alternative than the null.
  • Mediation analyses showed that >70% of the influence of BA45, BA44, ventral premotor cortex, or primary motor cortex damage on speech production was mediated by co-occurring aAF damage (IE/TE = 0.968, 0.791, 0.837, and 0.727, respectively).
  • In matched post hoc groups, the aAF group performed significantly worse than the BA44 group on spoken picture description (mean ± SD = 55.4 ± 5.7 versus 62.9 ± 4.1; P = 0.013), with no significant difference between the aAF and BA44+aAF groups (55.4 ± 5.7 versus 55.5 ± 5.3; P = 0.979).

Methods

  • Lesion-symptom study of 134 patients from the PLORAS database with unilateral left frontal lobe stroke, at least 3 months post-stroke and <10 years since onset; mean age at scan was 60.1 years, mean months since stroke was 30.1, and mean total lesion volume was 25.5 cm³.
  • Nine atlas-defined regions of interest were examined: BA44, BA45, ventral premotor cortex, primary motor cortex, superior central insula, putamen, anterior arcuate fasciculus, uncinate fasciculus, and frontal aslant tract. The outcome was the Comprehensive Aphasia Test spoken picture description T-score, with semantic memory scores and other variables included as regressors of no interest.
  • Analyses included multiple regression Models 1–4, Bayesian statistics, regression-based mediation, and post hoc ANOVA/ANCOVA on small groups matched for total lesion volume, age, and time post-stroke.

Limitations

  • Stated in the paper: anterior and long segments of the arcuate fasciculus were highly collinear (r = 0.915), so their effects could not be dissociated; atlas-based lesion load may miss functionally critical subparts of regions; it is unclear which cortical areas are disconnected by aAF damage; other white matter tracts were not examined; and the study did not address acute-phase impairments or recovery/reorganization.
  • Stated in the paper: the post hoc group analyses had small numbers, and pairwise comparisons used Fisher’s LSD without controlling family-wise error; the authors also note they did not correct for multiple comparisons in Model 2, arguing that type I error risk was prioritized over type II.
  • Evident from the text: the design is cross-sectional and cannot establish causal recovery trajectories; the sample is selected for left frontal lesions sparing posterior speech areas, so findings may not generalize to other lesion distributions or to patients with more extensive posterior damage.

Model-written summary. Check it against the paper before relying on it.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/brain/awaa460

Cites

122 of 122 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

0 of 65 cited sources checked · 0 supported · 0 flagged

  • Findingown data

    Speech production scores were worse after damage to the anterior arcuate fasciculus with relative sparing of Broca's area than after damage to Broca's area with relative sparing of the anterior arcuate fasciculus.

    “speech production scores were worse after damage to the anterior arcuate fasciculus with relative sparing of Broca’s area than after damage to Broca’s area with relative sparing of the anterior arcuate fasciculus”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Findingown data

    In the patient sample, lesion load in the anterior segment of the arcuate fasciculus was highly correlated with lesion load in the long segment of the arcuate fasciculus (r(134) = 0.915).

    “in our patient sample, lesion load in the anterior segment of the arcuate fasciculus was highly correlated [r(134) = 0.915] with lesion load in the long segment of the arcuate fasciculus”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Findingown data

    In the sample of 134 patients with left frontal damage, the degree of damage to Broca's area did not contribute to long-term speech production impairments.

    “with no contribution from the degree of damage to Broca’s area (as confirmed with Bayesian statistics)”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Findingown data

    In the sample of 134 patients with left frontal damage, long-term speech production impairments (lasting beyond 3 months post-stroke) were solely predicted by the degree of damage to white matter directly above the insula, in the vicinity of the anterior part of the arcuate fasciculus.

    “We found that, in our sample of patients with left frontal damage, long-term speech production impairments (lasting beyond 3 months post-stroke) were solely predicted by the degree of damage to white matter, directly above the insula, in the vicinity of the anterior part of the arcuate fasciculus, with no contribution from the degree of damage to Broca’s area (as confirmed with Bayesian statistics”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Findingown data

    When paired with lesion load in aAF, each of BA45, BA44, vPMC, or M1 stopped being statistically significant (direct effect).

    “However, when paired with lesion load in aAF (i.e. two regressors), each of these left posterior inferior frontal cortical regions stopped being statistically significant (see direct effect in Table 4).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
    • Rests on an assumption: The spoken picture description task and CAT scores validly measure long-term speech production abilities.
    • Rests on an assumption: The mediation analyses assume no unmeasured confounding of the relationships among cortical damage, aAF damage, and speech production.
  • May combine two claims. 6
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim. 26
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    Lesion load in BA44, but not BA45, significantly predicted speech production scores in Model 1.

    “Lesion load in BA44 but not BA45 significantly predicted speech production scores (Table 3).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
    • Rests on an assumption: The spoken picture description task and CAT scores validly measure long-term speech production abilities.
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).

    Findingown data

    Stroke lesions only very rarely affect grey matter in the absence of co-occurring white matter damage and vice versa, as shown in this study.

    “stroke lesions only very rarely affect grey matter in the absence of co-occurring white matter damage and vice versa (as we have shown here).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Premisecitation

    Damage to each of the selected white/grey matter regions has been associated with speech production impairments in prior lesion studies.

    “Damage to each of these white/grey matter regions has been associated with speech production impairments in prior lesion studies”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checked
    • cites Baldo et al., 2011 source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Fridriksson et al., 2013 source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Basilakos et al., 2014 source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    Damage to both banks of the superior central sulcus centred at MNI coordinates [−36, 1, 10] has consistently been associated with speech production impairments after stroke.

    “damage to both banks of the superior central sulcus centred at MNI coordinates [−36, 1, 10] has consistently been associated with speech production impairments after stroke”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checked
    • cites Dronkers, 1996 source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Baldo et al., 2011 source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Chenausky et al., 2020 source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    Broca's area plays a role in normal speech production.

    “We do not question the role that Broca’s area has been shown to play in normal speech production”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checked
    • cites Papoutsi et al., 2009 source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Flinker et al., 2015 source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Long et al., 2016 source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Study design and conductreasoning

    For Models 2 and 3, variance unrelated to lesion site was factored out by including total lesion volume, months post-stroke, age at stroke, and CAT semantic memory scores as regressors of no interest.

    “For Models 2 and 3 below, we factored out variance that was unrelated to lesion site by including the following regressors of no interest: (i) total lesion volume; (ii) months post-stroke; (iii) age at stroke; and (iv) scores from the CAT semantic memory task”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    BA44 and BA45 can be dissociated based on function, with BA44 more important for phonological processing and BA45 more important for semantic processing.

    “BA44 and BA45 can be dissociated based on their function, with BA44 being more important for phonological processing (i.e. related to the encoding or decoding of the sound structure of words) and BA45 being more important for semantic processing (i.e. related to the meaning of words)”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checked
    • cites Poldrack et al., 1999 source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites McDermott et al., 2003 source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Gitelman et al., 2005 source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    It was not until 2007 that the full extent of the lesions incurred by Broca's two famous cases was revealed in an MRI study showing damage to multiple subcortical grey and white matter regions.

    “It was not until 2007 that the full extent of the lesions incurred by Broca’s two famous cases (Broca, 1861a, b) was revealed in an MRI study showing damage to multiple subcortical grey and white matter regions (Dronkers et al., 2007)”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Dronkers et al., 2007 source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Study design and conductreasoning

    The borders of the regions were determined using a probability threshold of 50% for grey matter and 25% for white matter.

    “The borders of the regions were determined using a probability threshold of 50% for grey matter and 25% for white matter”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Study design and conductnone given

    The study used probabilistic human brain atlases that explicitly accommodate inter-subject variability in anatomy to define the borders of the grey and white matter regions of interest.

    “Three probabilistic human brain atlases that explicitly accommodate inter-subject variability in anatomy were used to define the borders of the grey and white matter regions of interest”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisenone given

    The two M1 subregions used are implicated in the motor control of the speech articulators (face, tongue and larynx).

    “we used the two (of five) M1 subregions from the Brainnetome atlas that are implicated in the motor control of the speech articulators (i.e. face, tongue and larynx)”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Study design and conductown data

    The main result (Model 2) is replicated using white matter masks derived exclusively from the Rojkova et al. (2016) atlas.

    “In Supplementary Table 1 we replicate our main result (i.e. Model 2 reported below) using white matter masks derived exclusively from the Rojkova et al. (2016) atlas”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Rojkova et al., 2016 source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Study design and conductcitation

    The CAT spoken picture description task was administered and scored following standardized procedures described in the assessment battery manual.

    “The CAT spoken picture description task was administered to each patient and the spoken responses scored following standardized procedures described in the assessment battery manual”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Swinburn et al., 2004

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    BA44 and BA45 are differentiated in cyto-architecture, receptor-architecture, structural/functional connectivity, and function.

    “given the well-established differentiation between these two regions in terms of cyto-architecture (Amunts et al., 1999), receptor-architecture (Amunts et al., 2010), structural/functional connectivity (Anwander et al., 2006; Margulies and Petrides, 2013) and, more importantly, function (Gough et al., 2005; Klaus and Hartwigsen, 2019)”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checked
    • cites Amunts et al., 1999 source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Amunts et al., 2010 source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Anwander et al., 2006 source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Interpretationreasoning

    The CAT spoken picture description task is a reasonable proxy for natural speech production.

    “The CAT spoken picture description task is a reasonable proxy for natural speech production, because it requires patients to interpret a complex scene and report their interpretation in a coherent, free-form manner”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    The anterior segment of the arcuate fasciculus connects the posterior inferior frontal cortex with the parieto-temporal cortex.

    “the anterior segment of the arcuate fasciculus (also referred to as the third branch of the superior longitudinal fasciculus or SLF III) that connects the posterior inferior frontal cortex with the parieto-temporal cortex”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checked
    • cites Catani et al., 2005 source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Martino et al., 2013 source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Bernard et al., 2019 source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    These probability thresholds are within the range of those used in previous studies.

    “These probability thresholds are within the range of those used in previous studies”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checked
    • cites Fridriksson et al., 2013 source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Lunven et al., 2015 source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Ivanova et al., 2016 source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    The uncinate fasciculus connects the medial and lateral orbitofrontal cortex with anterior parts of the temporal lobe.

    “the uncinate fasciculus that connects the medial and lateral orbitofrontal cortex with anterior parts of the temporal lobe”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Catani and Thiebaut de Schotten, 2008

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Martino et al., 2011 source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Although damage to Broca's area typically co-occurs with damage to neighbouring areas, damage to neighbouring areas can occur without damage to Broca's area.

    “although damage to Broca’s area typically co-occurs with damage to these neighbouring areas, damage to neighbouring areas can occur without damage to Broca’s area.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Gibo et al., 1981 source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Kahilogullari et al., 2012 source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.

    Study design and conductown data

    The data met all core assumptions for multiple regression, with the exception of high multicollinearity for vPMC, frontal aslant tract, and total lesion volume.

    “we established that our data met all core assumptions for multiple regression, with the exception of ‘high multicollinearity’ for two regressors of interest (vPMC and frontal aslant tract) and one regressor of no interest (total lesion volume)”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Field, 2018

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    The frontal aslant tract connects the posterior inferior frontal cortex with the supplementary/pre-supplementary motor area.

    “the frontal aslant tract that connects the posterior inferior frontal cortex with the supplementary/pre-supplementary motor area”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Catani et al., 2012a

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Vergani et al., 2014 source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Study design and conductnone given

    For each patient, the binary lesion image was visually inspected and checked against the normalized T1-weighted anatomical whole-brain volume/neurologist's lesion description, and improved if necessary.

    “For each patient, the binary lesion image was visually inspected and checked against the normalized T1-weighted anatomical whole-brain volume/neurologist’s lesion description, and improved if necessary”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    Persistent speech production impairments as a consequence of stroke damage to aAF have been reported in prior studies that did and did not collect DTI data.

    “persistent speech production impairments as a consequence of stroke damage to aAF have been reported in prior studies that did (Marchina et al., 2011) and did not collect (Fridriksson et al., 2013) DTI data to quantify structural abnormality in white matter pathways.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Marchina et al., 2011 source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Fridriksson et al., 2013 source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Study design and conductreasoning

    Using regions with a high probability of being the tract of interest according to normative atlases ensured that the regions were representative of the general population, minimizing inter-subject variability without completely removing it.

    “This ensured that the regions were representative of the general population, minimizing inter-subject variability without completely removing it.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Catani et al., 2012b

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Eickhoff et al., 2018 source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S1 (asserted).

    Premisecitation

    Broca's area damage is associated with short-term speech production impairments.

    “the association of Broca’s area damage with short-term speech production impairments (Ochfeld et al., 2010) should be re-evaluated after controlling for damage to aAF.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Ochfeld et al., 2010 source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Interpretationcitation

    One explanation for the constraint is that white matter can act as a bottleneck for multiple processing tracts from multiple neural networks, all of which are affected when the bottleneck is damaged, thereby limiting resources for recovery.

    “One explanation for this is that white matter can act as a bottle neck for multiple processing tracts from multiple neural networks, all of which are affected when the bottle neck is damaged, thereby limiting resources for recovery (Griffis et al., 2017).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Griffis et al., 2017 source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    Combined stroke damage to the medial subcallosal fasciculus and periventricular white matter has previously been associated with persistent non-fluent speech production.

    “there are other white matter tracts where combined stroke damage has previously been associated with persistent non-fluent speech production. These fibre pathways are more deeply situated (i.e. adjacent to the lateral ventricle) than the ones studied here and comprise the medial subcallosal fasciculus and periventricular white matter (Naeser et al., 1989; Naeser and Palumbo, 1994).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Naeser et al., 1989 source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Naeser and Palumbo, 1994

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Premisecitation

    Speech production impairments have been induced after aAF disruption by direct electrical stimulation.

    “Speech production impairments have also been induced after aAF disruption by means of direct electrical stimulation (van Geemen et al., 2014).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites van Geemen et al., 2014 source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Premisenone given

    Paul Broca's seminal work associated persistent speech production impairments with damage to the third convolution of the left frontal lobe (i.e. inferior frontal gyrus, particularly its posterior half).

    “Paul Broca’s seminal work associated persistent speech production impairments with damage to the third convolution of the left frontal lobe (i.e. inferior frontal gyrus, particularly its posterior half).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Interpretationreasoning

    It cannot be entirely certain which cortical areas are disconnected as a result of damage to the aAF region of interest.

    “We can therefore not be entirely sure which cortical areas are disconnected as a result of damage to our aAF region of interest.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
    • Rests on an assumption: White matter lesions are likely to damage fibres with a range of different cortical projections.
30 of 30
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    The 134 patients with left frontal lobe damage are representative of the broader population of left frontal lobe stroke patients, so that the study's conclusions generalise beyond the sample.

    “in our sample of patients with left frontal damage”
    “after left frontal lobe strokes”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    The nine selected atlas-defined grey and white matter regions are sufficient to capture the relevant brain regions for testing whether Broca's area damage contributes to long-term speech production outcome.

    “Given the methodological constraints described above, it was not feasible to investigate, within the same study, all the grey or white matter regions that have previously been associated with speech production”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    The spoken picture description task and CAT scores validly measure long-term speech production abilities.

    “The speech production scores for the BA44, aAF, and BA44+aAF groups were submitted to a one-way ANOVA.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    The atlas-defined BA44 and BA45 regions correspond to Broca’s area.

    “BA44 and BA45 (together known as Broca’s area)”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    The mediation analyses assume no unmeasured confounding of the relationships among cortical damage, aAF damage, and speech production.

    “This allowed us to estimate the degree to which the effect of damage to different parts of the left posterior inferior frontal cortex on our speech production scores was explained by co-occurring damage to the underlying white matter.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    The sample of 134 left frontal lobe stroke patients is representative of patients with relatively circumscribed left frontal lobe strokes.

    “Within our sample of 134 patients”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    White matter lesions are likely to damage fibres with a range of different cortical projections.

    “white matter lesions are likely to damage fibres with a range of different cortical projections.”
7 of 7

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The absence of production-related neural activity in area 44 is consistent with some recent work questioning the traditional role of Broca's area in speech.

    “The absence of production-related neural activity in area 44 is consistent with some recent work questioning the traditional role of Broca’s area in speech15–18.”

    From A high-performance speech neuroprosthesis (2023) · cites this paper as [17]

Statistics recomputed

Every reported test result, recomputed from its test statistic and degrees of freedom. A result shows as not adding up only once an independent check has confirmed it.

  • Consistentz = 3.487reported p < .001 · recomputed p < .001

    “z = 3.487, p < .001”

  • ConsistentF(2, 19) = 5.028reported p = .018 · recomputed p = .018

    “F(2,19) = 5.028, p = .018”

  • Consistentt(12) = 1.97reported p = .036 · recomputed p = .072

    “t(12) = 1.97, p = .036”

    The paper states a one-tailed test

3 of 3

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

Self-check results appear here once an independent check has confirmed them.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Marie, 1906, The third frontal convolution plays no special role in the function of language, Sem Méd, 26, 241

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Gajardo-Vidal, A., Lorca-Puls, D. L., team, P., Warner, H., Pshdary, B., Crinion, J. T., Leff, A. P., Hope, T. M. H., Geva, S., Seghier, M. L., Green, D. W., Bowman, H., & Price, C. J.
Affiliations
  • Wellcome Centre for Human Neuroimaging, UCL Queen Square Institute of Neurology, London, UK
  • Wellcome Centre for Human Neuroimaging (GB)
  • Institute of Cognitive Neuroscience, University College London, London, UK
  • UCL Queen Square Institute of Neurology (GB)
  • Emirates College for Advanced Education (AE)
  • University College London (GB)
  • University of Kent (GB)
Venue
Brain
Published
2021-01-31
Volume
144
Issue
3
Pages
817-832
ISSN
  • 0006-8950 (ISSN-L)
  • 1460-2156
OpenAlex
W3128748244
Cited by
150
References
122
Citations by year
2026: 13 · 2025: 28 · 2024: 42 · 2023: 26 · 2022: 25 · 2021: 15 · 2013: 1
FWCI
8.86
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Brain (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Kent Academic Repository (University of Kent) (acceptedVersion)
  • University of Birmingham Research Portal (University of Birmingham) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • Griffith Research Online (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • UCL Discovery (University College London) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Wellcome (203147/Z/16/Z, 205103/Z/16/Z)
  • Medical Research Council (MR/M023672/1)
  • Stroke Association (2014/02)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neurobiology of Language and Bilingualism
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Hemispheric Asymmetry in Neuroscience
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Language Development and Disorders
Keywords
Broca's area, stroke, speech production, Broca's aphasia, arcuate fasciculus, white matter injury, insula, long-term outcomes, ventral premotor cortex, frontal aslant tract, uncinate fasciculus
MeSH terms
Adult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Aphasia, Broca, Female, Frontal Lobe, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Stroke, Broca Area

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Claims read by deepseek-v4.1-flash under definition version 3 (extract-v3) on 2026-10-08.

Classified by jev-1.13-20260917 (gold-guideline-v0.2) on 2026-10-08.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review