The DOI matches its Crossref record; its reference list is not available.
Attachment disturbances and disorders in children exposed to early severe deprivation
Abstract
This case report summarizes in detail the clinical course of twins referred for intervention after maltreatment at 19 months of age who were followed to 36 months of age. Data from comprehensive assessment of parent–child relationships in these cases are reviewed and this material is considered in light of numerous family and systems factors that impacted the twins' clinical course. Diagnostic considerations pertaining to Reactive Attachment Disorder and the post-traumatic symptom of dissociation are presented. Links between recent research models of brain development and symptom presentation is discussed.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“which may explain why adoption studies with follow-up periods of 1 year or more after adoption have not detected signs of this disorder (3, 35).”
From A Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing Foster Care and Institutional Care for Children With Signs of Reactive Attachment Disorder (2012) · cites this paper as [35]
In the citing paper
“Results from this investigation have implications not only for young children raised in institutions but also for those who have experienced maltreatment (29, 37, 38) and other forms of neglect.”
From A Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing Foster Care and Institutional Care for Children With Signs of Reactive Attachment Disorder (2012) · cites this paper as [37]
Citations
No citation lists for this paper
No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.
Metadata
- Authors
- O'Connor, T. G., Bredenkamp, D., Rutter, M., & The English and Romanian Adoptees (ERA) Study Team
- Venue
- Infant Mental Health Journal
- Published
- 1999
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Attachment disturbances and disorders in children exposed to early severe deprivation. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/(sici)1097-0355(199921)20:1
- The paper
- O'Connor, T. G., Bredenkamp, D., Rutter, M., & The English and Romanian Adoptees (ERA) Study Team. (1999). Attachment disturbances and disorders in children exposed to early severe deprivation. Infant Mental Health Journal. https://doi.org/10.1002/(sici)1097-0355(199921)20%3A1
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
