Development of an aspect of executive control: Development of the abilities to remember what I said and to ?Do as I say, not as I do?
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Anti-imitation tasks are suitable across the preschool age range, although young 3-year-olds may struggle.
“These anti-imitation tasks are suitable across the preschool age range, although young 3-year-olds may struggle.”
From Assessing Executive Function in Preschoolers (2012) · cites this paper as Diamond & Taylor, 1996
On average, children as young as 31⁄2 years can get nearly two-thirds of trials correct on the Luria hand tapping test, but performance improves significantly throughout the preschool period in both accuracy and speed.
“On average children as young as 3½ years are able to get nearly two-thirds of the trials correct on the Luria hand tapping test, but performance improves significantly throughout the preschool period both in terms of accuracy and speed (Diamond & Taylor, 1996).”
From Assessing Executive Function in Preschoolers (2012) · cites this paper as Diamond & Taylor, 1996
The developmental trajectories for the Day-Night and Hand Tapping tasks differ, even though both require retention of two rules and inhibition of a dominant response.
“Thus, the developmental trajectories for the Day-Night and Hand Tapping tasks differ, even though they both require the retention of two rules and inhibition of a dominant response (Diamond & Taylor, 1996).”
From Assessing Executive Function in Preschoolers (2012) · cites this paper as Diamond & Taylor, 1996
No citation lists for this paper
No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.
- Authors
- Diamond, A., & Taylor, C.
- Venue
- Developmental Psychobiology
- Published
- 1996
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
