The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Individual differences in students' retention of knowledge and conceptual structures learned in university and high school courses: the case of test anxiety
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“The prevalence of academic evaluation anxiety has been estimated to be as high as 35% among college students, and has been shown to be associated with lower actual academic performance (Cassady & Johnson, 2002; Naveh-Benjamin, McKeachie, Lin, & Lavi, 1997).”
From Facing the fear of failure: An explorative qualitative study of client experiences in a mindfulness-based stress reduction program for university students with academic evaluation anxiety. (2015) · cites this paper as Naveh-Benjamin, McKeachie, Lin, & Lavi, 1997
In the citing paper
“The prevalence of academic evaluation anxiety has been estimated to be as high as 35% among college students, and has been shown to be associated with lower actual academic performance (Cassady & Johnson, 2002; Naveh-Benjamin, McKeachie, Lin, & Lavi, 1997).”
From Facing the fear of failure: An explorative qualitative study of client experiences in a mindfulness-based stress reduction program for university students with academic evaluation anxiety. (2015) · cites this paper as Naveh-Benjamin, McKeachie, Lin, & Lavi, 1997
Citations
Cites
On the psychology of prediction.
Kahneman, D., & Tversky, A. (1973) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/h0034747 · Cited by 6,202
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Risk as Analysis and Risk as Feelings: Some Thoughts about Affect, Reason, Risk, and Rationality
Slovic, P., Finucane, M. L., Peters, E., & MacGregor, D. G. (2004) · Risk Analysis · doi:10.1111/j.0272-4332.2004.00433.x · Cited by 3,885
Ericsson, K. A. (2004) · Academic Medicine · doi:10.1097/00001888-200410001-00022 · Cited by 2,988
Bedewy, D., & Gabriel, A. (2015) · Health Psychology Open · doi:10.1177/2055102915596714 · Cited by 836
Hjeltnes, A., Binder, P.-E., Moltu, C., & Dundas, I. (2015) · International Journal of Qualitative Studies on Health and Well-Being · doi:10.3402/qhw.v10.27990 · Cited by 132
Brown, L. A., Forman, E. M., Herbert, J. D., Hoffman, K. L., Yuen, E. K., & Goetter, E. M. (2011) · Behavior Modification · doi:10.1177/0145445510390930 · Cited by 134
Metadata
- Authors
- Naveh-Benjamin, M., Lavi, H., McKeachie, W. J., & Lin, Y.-G.
- Venue
- Applied Cognitive Psychology
- Published
- 1997
- References
- 1
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
