Cited by 19

The Interpretation of Quantum Mechanics: Many Worlds or Many Words?

Tegmark, Max·1998·Fortschritte der Physik

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/(sici)1521-3978(199811)46:6/8<855::aid-prop855>3.0.co;2-q

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • A diverse set of experimental groups worldwide have already implemented various variational quantum algorithms on their physical systems.

    “A diverse set of experimental groups worldwide have already implemented various variational quantum algorithms on their physical systems 52-59 .”

    From Quantum Chemistry in the Age of Quantum Computing (2019) · cites this paper as [53]

  • The application of the UCC ansatz truncated up to single and double excitations has been investigated both theoretically and experimentally.

    “Given the inherent advantage in implementing the ansatz as well as the high accuracies of CC methods, the application of the UCC ansatz truncated up to single and double excitations (UCCSD) has been investigated both theoretically and experimentally 52,53,59,325-330 .”

    From Quantum Chemistry in the Age of Quantum Computing (2019) · cites this paper as [53]

  • UCCSD has been demonstrated experimentally for HeH+ using a single trapped ion.

    “Finally, UCCSD has been demonstrated experimentally for HeH + using a single trapped ion 53 , for H 2 on a superconducting quantum computer 55 ,”

    From Quantum Chemistry in the Age of Quantum Computing (2019) · cites this paper as [53]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Tegmark, M.
Venue
Fortschritte der Physik
Published
1998
References
3

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review