Cited by 2,932Cold Atom Physics and Bose-Einstein CondensatesQuantum Computing Algorithms and ArchitectureQuantum many-body systems

Quantum simulation

Open access
Georgescu, I. M., Ashhab, S., Nori, Franco·2014·Reviews of Modern Physics

Abstract

Simulating quantum mechanics is known to be a difficult computational problem, especially when dealing with large systems. However, this difficulty may be overcome by using some controllable quantum system to study another less controllable or accessible quantum system, i.e., quantum simulation. Quantum simulation promises to have applications in the study of many problems in, e.g., condensed-matter physics, high-energy physics, atomic physics, quantum chemistry, and cosmology. Quantum simulation could be implemented using quantum computers, but also with simpler, analog devices that would require less control, and therefore, would be easier to construct. A number of quantum systems such as neutral atoms, ions, polar molecules, electrons in semiconductors, superconducting circuits, nuclear spins, and photons have been proposed as quantum simulators. This review outlines the main theoretical and experimental aspects of quantum simulation and emphasizes some of the challenges and promises of this fast-growing field.

AI snapshot

Written from the paper’s full text.

TL;DR

This review surveys quantum simulation—using controllable quantum systems to emulate less accessible quantum systems—covering digital and analog approaches, physical platforms, resource requirements, and applications. It argues that practical quantum simulators may be realized before full-scale quantum computers, with neutral atoms in optical lattices and trapped ions currently among the most advanced platforms.

Key findings

  • Classical simulation of quantum systems scales exponentially: representing the state of 40 spin-1/2 particles requires \(2^{40} \approx 10^{12}\) numbers, about \(3.2 \times 10^{13}\) bits or 4 TB in single precision, while 80 spins would require about \(3.8 \times 10^{25}\) bits.
  • Quantum simulators can store this information more compactly: the state of 40 spin-1/2 particles that needs a 4 TB classical register can be represented by a 40-qubit register.
  • Resource estimates for digital quantum simulation (DQS) of chemical dynamics suggest that outperforming current classical computers would require at least 100 qubits and over 200,000 quantum gates per step; for molecular hydrogen, a precision of \(\pm 10^{-4} E_h\) was achieved with about 522 gates.
  • Experimentally, the most advanced DQS has been realized with trapped ions, simulating spin models with up to six spins and one experiment requiring sequences of more than 100 quantum gates; neutral atoms in optical lattices are described as the most advanced platform for analog quantum simulation (AQS), with hundreds of ions used in a two-dimensional ion array for a spin-system simulation.

Methods

  • This is a review article, not a primary experimental or theoretical study; it synthesizes theoretical and experimental literature on quantum simulation.
  • It organizes the field into digital quantum simulation, analog quantum simulation, and quantum-information-inspired classical algorithms, and discusses resource estimation, fault tolerance, physical realizations, and applications.
  • The paper reviews platforms including neutral atoms, trapped ions, polar molecules, nuclear and electronic spins, superconducting circuits, photons, and other systems, with applications in condensed-matter physics, high-energy physics, cosmology, atomic physics, quantum chemistry, open quantum systems, nuclear physics, and interferometry.

Limitations

  • The paper states that given the breadth of topics, not all technical details can be provided and directs readers to references; it also notes that initial-state preparation and measurement in AQS have not been thoroughly discussed in the literature.
  • The paper states that resource estimation for AQS has not received much work, and that decoherence and errors in quantum simulation require further study, especially for each physical implementation.
  • Evident from the text: as a broad review, it does not present a systematic meta-analysis or new primary data, and its performance comparisons rely on cited proposals and experiments rather than a unified benchmark.

Model-written summary. Check it against the paper before relying on it.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1103/revmodphys.86.153

Cites

392 of 392 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Nothing to recompute.

Claims the paper makes

0 of 172 cited sources checked · 0 supported · 0 flagged

  • Findingcitation
    § I. INTRODUCTION · p. 2

    Some proof-of-principle experiments on quantum simulation have already been realized.

    “In fact, some proofof-principle experiments on quantum simulation have already been realized (see e.g. (Friedenauer et al. , 2008; Gerritsma et al. , 2010; Greiner et al. , 2002; Kim et al. , 2010; Lanyon et al. , 2010; Leibfried et al. , 2002; Neeley et al. , 2009)).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checked
    • cites Friedenauer et al., 2008

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Gerritsma et al., 2010

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Greiner et al., 2002

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Findingreasoning
    § II. THE PROBLEM · p. 3

    For N = 40, storing the state requires 2^40 ≈ 10^12 numbers.

    “This implies storing 2 40 ≈ 10 12 numbers for | φ 〉”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Findingnone given
    § IV. DIGITAL AND ANALOG QUANTUM SIMULATION · p. 4

    The storage capacity of N qubits is exponentially larger than that of N classical bits.

    “For example, the storage capacity of N qubits is exponentially larger than that of N classical bits .”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Findingreasoning
    § II. THE PROBLEM · p. 3

    Doubling the number of spins to 80 would require about 3.8 × 10^25 bits, or 5 × 10^12 TB.

    “Double the number of spins, and ∼ 3 . 8 × 10 25 bits (or 5 × 10 12 TB) would be required.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Findingreasoning
    § II. THE PROBLEM · p. 3

    Calculating the time evolution of N spin-1/2 particles requires exponentiating a 2^N × 2^N matrix.

    “Calculating the time evolution of this system requires exponentiating a 2 N × 2 N matrix.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim. 96
  • May combine two claims. 54
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Findingcitation
    § B. Nuclear and electronic spins · p. 15

    In a recent experiment, the predictions of the two-dimensional Mott-Hubbard model were tested for electrons in an artificial honeycomb lattice.

    “In a recent experiment, the predictions of the two-dimensional Mott-Hubbard model were tested for electrons in an artificial honeycomb lattice (Singha et al. , 2011).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Singha et al. , 2011

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Findingcitation
    § C. Superconducting circuits · p. 16

    Circuits containing 512 qubits have been fabricated, although quantum coherence was not tested on these circuits in the same way that coherence is commonly tested in other experiments using small numbers of qubits.

    “As for scalability, circuits containing 512 qubits have been fabricated (Harris, 2012; Harris et al. , 2010), although quantum coherence was not tested on these circuits in the same way that coherence is commonly tested in other experiments using small numbers of qubits.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Harris, 2012

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Harris et al. , 2010

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Findingcitation
    § D. Photons · p. 17

    Corresponding experiments with up to four photons were performed.

    “Recently, it was shown that the propagation of photons in a network of beam splitters is in general a computationally difficult task for classical computers even for a few tens of photons (Aaronson and Arkhipov, 2011), and corresponding experiments with up to four photons were performed (Broome et al. , 2013; Crespi et al. , 2013; Spring et al. , 2013; Tillmann et al. , 2013).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checked
    • cites Broome et al. , 2013

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Crespi et al. , 2013

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Spring et al. , 2013

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Findingcitation
    § 3. Quantum phase transitions · p. 20

    The quantum phase transition from a superfluid to a Mott insulator phase, predicted in (Fisher et al., 1989), was first observed in 2002 in an ensemble of atoms trapped in an optical lattice.

    “For example, the quantum phase transition from a superfluid to a Mott insulator phase, predicted in (Fisher et al. , 1989), was first observed in 2002 (Greiner et al. , 2002) in an ensemble of atoms trapped in an optical lattice.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Fisher et al. , 1989

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Greiner et al. , 2002

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Findingcitation
    § 1. Hubbard model · p. 19

    An AQS of the Bose-Hubbard model using atoms in optical lattices was proposed and implemented.

    “As discussed in Section VI.A, an AQS of the BoseHubbard model using atoms in optical lattices was proposed in (Jaksch et al. , 1998) and implemented in (Greiner et al. , 2002).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Jaksch et al. , 1998

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Greiner et al. , 2002

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Findingcitation
    § C. Superconducting circuits · p. 16

    More than 200 superconducting resonators were recently fabricated on a single chip.

    “Furthermore, more than 200 superconducting resonators were recently fabricated on a single chip (Houck et al. , 2012).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Houck et al. , 2012

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Findingcitation
    § D. Photons · p. 17

    Photons have been used to calculate the possible fractional statistics of anyons using a six-photon graph state, to calculate the energy spectrum of the hydrogen molecule to 20 bits of precision, and to simulate frustrated spin systems.

    “Photons have been used to calculate the possible fractional statistics of anyons using a six-photon graph state (Lu et al. , 2009), to calculate the energy spectrum of the hydrogen molecule to 20 bits of precision (Lanyon et al. , 2010) and to simulate frustrated spin systems (Ma et al. , 2011).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checked
    • cites Lu et al. , 2009

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Lanyon et al. , 2010

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Ma et al. , 2011

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.

    Findingnone given
    § C. Superconducting circuits · p. 16

    State-of-the-art superconducting qubits have coherence times exceeding 100 μs, i.e. decoherence rates below 10 kHz, which is quite high considering that other energy scales in the circuit are typically in the range 10 MHz to 10 GHz.

    “State-of-the-art superconducting qubits have coherence times exceeding 100 µ s (i.e. decoherence rates below 10 kHz), which is quite high considering that other energy scales in the circuit are typically in the range 10 MHz - 10 GHz.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Findingcitation
    § 4. Disordered and frustrated systems · p. 22

    Optical lattices have been used to experimentally realize a disordered system that may lead to the observation of a Bose glass phase.

    “As for AQS, optical lattices have been used to experimentally realize a disordered system that may lead to the observation of a Bose glass phase (Fallani et al. , 2007).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Fallani et al. , 2007

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Findingcitation
    § F. Current state of the art · p. 18

    In trapped-ion DQS experiments, simulations of various spin models with up to six spins have been demonstrated, with one experiment requiring sequences of more than 100 quantum gates.

    “In these experiments, simulations of various spin models with up to six spins have been demonstrated, with one experiment requiring sequences of more than 100 quantum gates.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Lanyon et al. , 2011

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).

    Findingnone given
    § VIII. CONCLUDING REMARKS · p. 31

    Individual control and readout are difficult to realize for atoms in optical lattices.

    “individual control and readout are difficult to realize for atoms in optical lattices”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).

    Findingnone given
    § VIII. CONCLUDING REMARKS · p. 31

    For other systems, individual control and readout are not a problem.

    “while for other systems that is not a problem”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).

    Findingnone given
    § VIII. CONCLUDING REMARKS · p. 31

    With the exception of atoms in optical lattices, quantum simulators cannot yet handle large arrays of qubits.

    “With the exception of atoms in optical lattices, quantum simulators cannot yet handle large arrays of qubits.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisereasoning
    § I. INTRODUCTION · p. 2

    A quantum machine would have the capacity to contain an exponentially large amount of information without using an exponentially large amount of physical resources, making it a natural tool to perform quantum simulation.

    “The machine would have the capacity to contain an exponentially large amount of information without using an exponentially large amount of physical resources, thus making it a natural tool to perform quantum simulation.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Interpretationnone given
    § S. Ashhab † · p. 1

    Quantum simulation could be implemented using quantum computers, but also with simpler, analog devices that would require less control and therefore be easier to construct.

    “Quantum simulation could be implemented using quantum computers, but also with simpler, analog devices that would require less control, and therefore, would be easier to construct.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Interpretationnone given
    § I. INTRODUCTION · p. 2

    Other potential application areas of quantum simulation include high-energy physics, quantum chemistry, cosmology and nuclear physics.

    “Other potential application areas include highenergy physics, quantum chemistry, cosmology and nuclear physics.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing).

    Interpretationcitation
    § I. INTRODUCTION · p. 2

    With the latest advances in the coherent manipulation of quantum systems, practical applications of quantum simulation can be expected in the coming years.

    “With the latest advances in the coherent manipulation of quantum systems (Buluta et al. , 2011; Ladd et al. , 2010), such as atoms in optical lattices, trapped ions, nuclear spins, superconducting circuits, or spins in semiconductors, practical applications of quantum simulation can be expected in the coming years.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Buluta et al., 2011

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Ladd et al., 2010

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Premisereasoning
    § I. INTRODUCTION · p. 2

    Depending on the specifics of the problem, good approximations are not always available or they also face limitations.

    “However, depending on the specifics of the problem under study, good approximations are not always available or they also face some limitations.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Interpretationnone given
    § S. Ashhab † · p. 1

    Quantum simulation promises to have applications in the study of many problems in condensed-matter physics, high-energy physics, atomic physics, quantum chemistry and cosmology.

    “Quantum simulation promises to have applications in the study of many problems in, e.g., condensed-matter physics, high-energy physics, atomic physics, quantum chemistry and cosmology.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Interpretationreasoning
    § S. Ashhab † · p. 1

    The difficulty of simulating quantum mechanics may be overcome by using a controllable quantum system to study another less controllable or accessible quantum system, i.e., quantum simulation.

    “However, this difficulty may be overcome by using some controllable quantum system to study another less controllable or accessible quantum system, i.e., quantum simulation.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Interpretationreasoning
    § I. INTRODUCTION · p. 2

    Quantum simulation would allow the study of many difficult problems in condensed-matter physics, such as quantum phase transitions, quantum magnetism or high-Tc superconductivity.

    “For instance, in condensedmatter physics, quantum simulation would allow the study of many difficult problems, such as quantum phase transitions, quantum magnetism or highT c superconductivity.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning
    § I. INTRODUCTION · p. 2

    Simpler quantum devices that mimic the evolution of other quantum systems in an analog manner could be used for quantum simulation, though they are problem-specific and not universal simulators.

    “Simpler quantum devices that mimic the evolution of other quantum systems in an analog manner could be used for this task (note that these are not universal simulators, but rather problem-specific machines).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).

    Premisenone given
    § S. Ashhab † · p. 1

    A number of quantum systems such as neutral atoms, ions, polar molecules, electrons in semiconductors, superconducting circuits, nuclear spins and photons have been proposed as quantum simulators.

    “A number of quantum systems such as neutral atoms, ions, polar molecules, electrons in semiconductors, superconducting circuits, nuclear spins and photons have been proposed as quantum simulators.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationnone given
    § A. Digital quantum simulation (DQS) · p. 6

    Ancilla qubits are required for simulating many-body interactions, which adds to the resource requirements.

    “Moreover, note that ancilla qubits are required, which adds to the resource requirements (see Section V. B).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
    • The authors state this as an assumption: There is no restriction in applying one- and two-qubit gates and all qubits of the simulator can be individually addressed and measured.
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Interpretationnone given
    § IV. DIGITAL AND ANALOG QUANTUM SIMULATION · p. 4

    The quantum simulation problem is not really solved unless the initial state preparation, the implementation of the time evolution and the measurement are realized using only polynomial resources.

    “This sounds very promising, but the quantum simulation problem is not really solved unless the initial state preparation, the implementation of the time evolution and the measurement are realized using only polynomial resources.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation
    § A. Digital quantum simulation (DQS) · p. 6

    Several methods have been developed for efficient simulation of many-body interactions using two-body interactions, but it still remains a difficult problem.

    “This question has been thoroughly studied, and several methods have been developed (see, e.g., (Berry et al. , 2007; Bravyi et al. , 2008; Bremner et al. , 2005; Brown et al. , 2011; Dodd et al. , 2002; D¨ ur et al. , 2008; Hastings, 2006; Wang and Zanardi, 2002; Wocjan et al. , 2002a,b,c)), but it still remains a difficult problem.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checked
    • cites Berry et al., 2007

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Bravyi et al., 2008

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Bremner et al., 2005

      Not checked in the free run.

    • The authors state this as an assumption: There is no restriction in applying one- and two-qubit gates and all qubits of the simulator can be individually addressed and measured.
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based). May combine two claims.

    Premisenone given
    § A. Digital quantum simulation (DQS) · p. 5

    In many cases the preparation of the initial state is difficult and an efficient algorithm may not be available.

    “In many cases the preparation of the initial state is difficult and an efficient algorithm may not be available.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
    • The authors state this as an assumption: There is no restriction in applying one- and two-qubit gates and all qubits of the simulator can be individually addressed and measured.
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Interpretationreasoning
    § IV. DIGITAL AND ANALOG QUANTUM SIMULATION · p. 4

    Initial state preparation, implementation of time evolution and measurement are not easy tasks, even for quantum simulators.

    “As will be discussed later, these are not easy tasks, even for quantum simulators.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning
    § II. THE PROBLEM · p. 3

    The sign problem results in an exponential growth of the statistical error, and hence the required simulation time, with the number of particles, which cancels the advantage of Monte Carlo methods.

    “This results in an exponential growth of the statistical error, and hence the required simulation time, with the number of particles, which cancels the advantage of the Monte Carlo methods.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S1 (asserted), S4 (based).

    Premisenone given
    § A. Digital quantum simulation (DQS) · p. 5

    In most cases of practical interest, [H_l, H_l'] ≠ 0 in general.

    “Unfortunately, in most cases of practical interest [ H l , H l ′ ] = 0 in general.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
    • The authors state this as an assumption: The Hamiltonian can be written as a sum of many terms that describe local interactions.
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation
    § II. THE PROBLEM · p. 3

    Classical stochastic methods, namely Monte Carlo algorithms, have been developed as a way of tackling the difficult problem of simulating large quantum systems.

    “Classical stochastic methods, namely Monte Carlo algorithms (Suzuki, 1993), have been developed as a way of tackling the difficult problem of simulating large quantum systems.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Suzuki, 1993

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisenone given
    § B. Analog quantum simulation (AQS) · p. 7

    In AQS, the Hamiltonian of the system to be simulated is directly mapped onto the Hamiltonian of the simulator, which can be controlled at least to some extent.

    “The Hamiltonian of the system to be simulated, H sys , is directly mapped onto the Hamiltonian of the simulator, H sim , which can be controlled at least to some extent:”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation
    § A. Digital quantum simulation (DQS) · p. 4

    DQS is universal in principle because any unitary operation can be written in terms of universal quantum gates.

    “Since any unitary operation can be written in terms of universal quantum gates, it follows that in principle 'anything' can be simulated, i.e. DQS is universal (Lloyd, 1996).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Lloyd, 1996

      Not checked in the free run.

    • The authors state this as an assumption: There is no restriction in applying one- and two-qubit gates and all qubits of the simulator can be individually addressed and measured.
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning
    § A. Digital quantum simulation (DQS) · p. 4

    Although not all mathematically allowed Hamiltonians can be simulated efficiently, those that appear in most physical theories can be simulated efficiently.

    “In other words, although not all mathematically allowed Hamiltonians can be simulated efficiently, those that appear in most physical theories can be simulated efficiently.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
    • The authors state this as an assumption: The Hamiltonian can be written as a sum of many terms that describe local interactions.
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning
    § A. Digital quantum simulation (DQS) · p. 4

    Not any unitary operation can be efficiently simulated with polynomial resources; therefore, there are Hamiltonians that cannot be efficiently simulated by DQS.

    “However, it must be noted that not any unitary operation can be efficiently simulated (that is with polynomial resources) and, therefore, there are Hamiltonians that cannot be efficiently simulated in this way.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
    • The authors state this as an assumption: There is no restriction in applying one- and two-qubit gates and all qubits of the simulator can be individually addressed and measured.
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation
    § A. Digital quantum simulation (DQS) · p. 6

    Using randomness, it is possible to efficiently simulate local bounded Hamiltonians with arbitrary time dependence.

    “The topic was further discussed in (Poulin et al. , 2011) where it was shown that using randomness, it is possible to efficiently simulate local bounded Hamiltonians with arbitrary time dependence.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Poulin et al., 2011

      Not checked in the free run.

    • The authors state this as an assumption: The Hamiltonian can be written as a sum of many terms that describe local interactions.
    • The authors state this as an assumption: There is no restriction in applying one- and two-qubit gates and all qubits of the simulator can be individually addressed and measured.
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning
    § A. Digital quantum simulation (DQS) · p. 4

    The approximation of the desired unitary evolution can in principle be made arbitrarily accurate by refining the decomposition, but this comes at the cost of an ever-increasing number of gates.

    “In principle, this approximation can be made arbitrarily accurate (by refining the decomposition), but this comes at the cost of an ever-increasing number of gates.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
    • The authors state this as an assumption: There is no restriction in applying one- and two-qubit gates and all qubits of the simulator can be individually addressed and measured.
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation
    § A. Digital quantum simulation (DQS) · p. 6

    The recursive phase-estimation algorithm of Aspuru-Guzik et al. (2005) provides an arbitrarily accurate estimate of molecular energy, with accuracy increasing with the number of iterations.

    “This procedure provides an arbitrarily accurate estimate of the energy, with the accuracy increasing with increasing number of iterations.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Aspuru-Guzik et al., 2005

      Not checked in the free run.

    • The authors state this as an assumption: There is no restriction in applying one- and two-qubit gates and all qubits of the simulator can be individually addressed and measured.
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation
    § A. Digital quantum simulation (DQS) · p. 4

    According to Meyer (2002), it should also be possible to use quantum computers to simulate classical physics more efficiently.

    “Moreover, according to (Meyer, 2002) it should also be possible to use quantum computers to simulate classical physics more efficiently (see also (Sinha and Russer, 2010; Yung et al. , 2010)).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Meyer, 2002

      Not checked in the free run.

    • The authors state this as an assumption: There is no restriction in applying one- and two-qubit gates and all qubits of the simulator can be individually addressed and measured.
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning
    § B. Decoherence and errors · p. 10

    A few imperfections in an ensemble of particles performing AQS might not affect the overall behavior of the ensemble, such that the AQS might still produce useful results even in the presence of these imperfections.

    “As a result, a few imperfections in an ensemble of particles performing AQS might not affect the overall behavior of the ensemble, such that the AQS might still produce useful results even in the presence of these imperfections.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisenone given
    § B. Analog quantum simulation (AQS) · p. 7

    The simulator in AQS may only partly reproduce the dynamics of the system.

    “Note that the simulator may only partly reproduce the dynamics of the system.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning
    § B. Analog quantum simulation (AQS) · p. 7

    If the quantum simulator suffers from uncertainties in the control parameters, the phase transition under study could still be observed, providing the answer to the question of interest.

    “If the quantum simulator suffers from uncertainties in the control parameters, the phase transition under study could still be observed, hence providing the answer to the question of interest.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisenone given
    § B. Analog quantum simulation (AQS) · p. 7

    The choice of the mapping in AQS depends on what needs to be simulated and on the capabilities of the simulator.

    “The choice of the mapping depends on what needs to be simulated and on the capabilities of the simulator.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).

    Premisenone given
    § C. Quantum-information-inspired algorithms for the classical simulation of quantum systems · p. 8

    Fully characterizing a quantum system requires an exponentially large number of parameters.

    “As discussed in the previous sections, fully characterizing a quantum system requires an exponentially large number of parameters.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning
    § A. Resource estimation · p. 9

    Chemical dynamics could be simulated on a quantum computer in O(N^2 m^2) steps, which is exponentially faster than known classical algorithms.

    “so chemical dynamics could be simulated on a quantum computer in O ( N 2 m 2 ) steps, which is exponentially faster than known classical algorithms.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Interpretationreasoning
    § B. Analog quantum simulation (AQS) · p. 7

    The analog simulation of the Bose-Hubbard model using atoms in optical lattices is straightforward.

    “The analog simulation of the BoseHubbard model using atoms in optical lattices is therefore straightforward.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Premisecitation
    § A. Resource estimation · p. 9

    The estimation of the requirements for simulating N particles interacting through a pairwise potential has been performed in (Kassal et al., 2008).

    “The estimation of the requirements for simulating N particles interacting through a pairwise potential has been performed in (Kassal et al. , 2008).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Kassal et al. , 2008

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisereasoning
    § B. Decoherence and errors · p. 10

    It is generally believed that the effects of decoherence are less dramatic for quantum simulators than for quantum computers.

    “Although quantum simulators are affected by the interactions with the environment in the same way as quantum computers, it is generally believed that the effects of decoherence are less dramatic.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Premisenone given
    § B. Analog quantum simulation (AQS) · p. 7

    Sometimes the mapping in AQS is indeed straightforward, but this is not always the case, and quite often clever mappings have to be devised, sometimes involving additional externally applied fields or ancillary systems to mediate various interactions.

    “Sometimes the mapping is indeed straightforward, but this is not always the case, and quite often clever mappings have to be devised, sometimes involving additional externally applied fields or ancillary systems to mediate various interactions.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).

    Interpretationreasoning
    § B. Analog quantum simulation (AQS) · p. 8

    Directly measuring some physical quantity of the simulator would yield information about its analogue in the simulated system.

    “Moreover, directly measuring some physical quantity of the simulator would yield information about its analogue in the simulated system.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
    • The authors state this as an assumption: The simulated system and its simulator are very similar.
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).

    Interpretationnone given
    § B. Analog quantum simulation (AQS) · p. 7

    Finding the mapping in an AQS might, at first glance, look simpler than obtaining the most efficient gate decomposition for a given Hamiltonian in DQS.

    “Finding the mapping in an AQS might, at first glance, look simpler than obtaining the most efficient gate decomposition for a given Hamiltonian in DQS.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).

    Premisenone given
    § A. Resource estimation · p. 8

    With a few tens of qubits, one could perform frustrated-spin simulations or molecular-energy calculations at the limits of present-day supercomputers.

    “With a few tens of qubits, one could perform frustrated-spin simulations or molecular-energy calculations at the limits of present-day supercomputers.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation
    § A. Resource estimation · p. 9

    Surface codes are superior to circuit models with quantum error correction for fault-tolerant DQS.

    “By analyzing the Ising model as a representative example, and using parameters that are relevant to present-day experiments, the authors concluded that surface codes are superior for quantum simulation.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites You et al. , 2013

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).

    Interpretationnone given
    § A. Resource estimation · p. 8

    The amount of physical resources needed for quantum simulation of an N-body problem strongly depends on the type of problem and the particularities of the simulator.

    “The amount of physical resources (i.e., number of qubits, number of operations, number of steps, etc.) needed for the quantum simulation in the case of an N -body problem strongly depends on the type of problem and the particularities of the simulator.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation
    § A. Resource estimation · p. 8

    As a general rule of thumb, it is sometimes said that in order to outperform classical computers quantum simulators require somewhere between 40 and 100 qubits.

    “As a general rule of thumb, it is sometimes said that in order to outperform classical computers quantum simulators require somewhere between 40 and 100 qubits (Buluta and Nori, 2009).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Buluta and Nori, 2009

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning
    § C. Quantum-information-inspired algorithms for the classical simulation of quantum systems · p. 8

    This new class of algorithms makes it possible to simulate spin systems for longer times, and to study physical phenomena which would have been inaccessible with previous methods.

    “This new class of algorithms makes it possible to simulate spin systems for longer times, and to study physical phenomena which would have been inaccessible with previous methods.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisenone given
    § B. Analog quantum simulation (AQS) · p. 7

    In AQS, one usually emulates an effective many-body model of the simulated system, using a controllable toy-model to reproduce the property of interest, e.g., the dynamics or ground state.

    “In AQS one is usually emulating an effective many-body model of the simulated system. A controllable 'toy-model' of the system is used to reproduce the property of interest, e.g. the dynamics or ground state.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation
    § C. Quantum-information-inspired algorithms for the classical simulation of quantum systems · p. 8

    The quantum version of the Metropolis algorithm allows for direct sampling from the eigenstates of the Hamiltonian, overcoming the sign problem.

    “Its quantum version allows for the direct sampling from the eigenstates of the Hamiltonian, overcoming in this way the sign problem (Temme et al. , 2011).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Temme et al. , 2011

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation
    § B. Decoherence and errors · p. 10

    The decoherence of the simulator might be useful as it could serve as a rough way of modeling the decoherence of the simulated system.

    “Moreover, it has been suggested that the decoherence of the simulator might be useful (Lloyd, 1996) as it could serve as a rough way of modeling the decoherence of the simulated system.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Lloyd, 1996

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Premisenone given
    § B. Nuclear and electronic spins · p. 15

    Quantum dots allow flexible control over the confinement potential and can be excited optically.

    “Moreover, quantum dots allow flexible control over the confinement potential and they can also be excited optically.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Interpretationnone given
    § B. Nuclear and electronic spins · p. 15

    Electron spins in quantum dots may provide an advantage over atoms in optical lattices due to the very low temperatures relative to the Fermi temperature that can be reached and the natural long-range Coulomb interaction.

    “Electron spins in quantum dots may provide an advantage over atoms in optical lattices due to the very low temperatures (relative to the Fermi temperature) that can be reached and the natural long-range Coulomb interaction.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).

    Premisenone given
    § VI. PHYSICAL REALIZATIONS · p. 11

    The physical implementation of a quantum simulator requires a controllable quantum mechanical system.

    “The physical implementation of a quantum simulator requires a controllable quantum mechanical system.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisereasoning
    § B. Nuclear and electronic spins · p. 15

    NMR is not very flexible and its main disadvantage is lack of scalability, one reason being spectral crowding that occurs as the number of energy levels increases exponentially with increasing number of spins.

    “However, it is not very flexible and its main disadvantage is the lack of scalability, one of the main reasons being the spectral crowding that occurs as the number of energy levels increases exponentially with increasing number of spins.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Interpretationreasoning
    § VI. PHYSICAL REALIZATIONS · p. 11

    An array of qubits plus their controls would make an ideal quantum simulator for many condensed matter problems because it can be thought of as the simplified, magnified lattice structure of a solid.

    “For many problems in this class, an array of qubits plus their controls (see Figure 8) would make an ideal quantum simulator because it can be thought of as the simplified, magnified lattice structure of a 'solid', that can be manipulated in a number of different ways in order to test various models.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation
    § A. Atoms and ions · p. 13

    Ion qubits have long coherence times of the order of seconds, and sequences of high-fidelity quantum gates have been demonstrated in experiment.

    “Ion qubits also have long coherence times of the order of seconds, and sequences of high-fidelity quantum gates have been demonstrated in experiment (Hanneke et al. , 2009; Lanyon et al. , 2011).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Hanneke et al. , 2009

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Lanyon et al. , 2011

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisereasoning
    § B. Nuclear and electronic spins · p. 15

    Using RF pulses, various one-, two- and possibly multi-qubit gates can be implemented in NMR.

    “Using RF pulses various one-, two- and possibly multi-qubit gates can be implemented.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing).

    Interpretationnone given
    § B. Decoherence and errors · p. 11

    Cross-validation over a number of different physical systems could be used to rule out the particular imperfections of each implementation as possible sources of error.

    “Crossvalidation over a number of different physical systems could be used, and in this way the particular imperfections of each implementation could be ruled out as possible sources of error.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Premisenone given
    § A. Atoms and ions · p. 12

    Optical lattices provide the highly desirable properties of being easily tunable and essentially defect-free.

    “Indeed, optical lattices provide the highly desirable properties of being easily tunable and essentially defect-free.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation
    § A. Atoms and ions · p. 13

    Alternative systems that can be used for quantum simulation include Rydberg atoms and polar molecules.

    “Alternative systems that can be used for quantum simulation include Rydberg atoms (Weimer et al. , 2010) and polar molecules (Lewenstein, 2006; Micheli et al. , 2006).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checked
    • cites Weimer et al. , 2010

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Lewenstein, 2006

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Micheli et al. , 2006

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation
    § B. Nuclear and electronic spins · p. 15

    Nuclear spins manipulated by means of NMR have been among the first experimental systems to implement small quantum algorithms and quantum simulation.

    “Nuclear spins manipulated by means of NMR have been among the first experimental systems to implement small quantum algorithms and quantum simulation (Li et al. , 2011; Peng and Suter, 2010; Peng et al. , 2009; Zhang et al. , 2012).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checked
    • cites Li et al. , 2011

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Peng and Suter, 2010

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Peng et al. , 2009

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationnone given
    § B. Nuclear and electronic spins · p. 15

    Nuclear spins provide a very good testbed for various small simulation problems and allow the implementation of both DQS and AQS.

    “Nevertheless, nuclear spins provide a very good testbed for various small simulation problems and allow the implementation of both DQS and AQS.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).

    Premisenone given
    § VI. PHYSICAL REALIZATIONS · p. 11

    Any physical system that can be used as a quantum computer would also be a universal machine for DQS.

    “Any physical system that can be used as a quantum computer would also be a universal machine for DQS.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisenone given
    § B. Nuclear and electronic spins · p. 15

    If the confinement region of a quantum dot is roughly the same size as the wavelength of the charge carrier, the energy levels are quantized and the quantum dot becomes very similar to a real atom.

    “If the region is roughly the same size as the wavelength of the charge carrier, the energy levels are quantized and the quantum dot becomes very similar to a real atom (and can therefore be referred to as an 'artificial atom').”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation
    § A. Atoms and ions · p. 13

    Ions can be trapped by electric or magnetic fields, laser-cooled and manipulated with high precision for realizing quantum simulation.

    “Ions can be trapped by electric (or magnetic) fields, laser-cooled and manipulated with high precision for realizing quantum simulation (Blatt and Wineland, 2008; Johanning et al. , 2009; Sch¨ atz et al. , 2007, 2004).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checked
    • cites Blatt and Wineland, 2008

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Johanning et al. , 2009

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Sch¨ atz et al. , 2007, 2004

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation
    § 6. Superconductivity · p. 24

    Several groups have observed signatures of the crossover between a BCS and a BEC superfluid as the strength of attractive interactions between fermionic particles is varied.

    “several groups have observed signatures of the crossover between a BCS and a BEC superfluid as the strength of attractive interactions between fermionic particles is varied”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checked
    • cites Regal et al. , 2004

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Zwierlein et al. , 2005

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Lewenstein et al. , 2007

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Premisenone given
    § C. Superconducting circuits · p. 16

    The frequencies of superconducting circuits can be tuned in situ by adjusting an external parameter, typically an external magnetic field, and the coupling energy between two qubits can be turned on and off at will.

    “The frequencies can also be tuned in situ by adjusting an external parameter (typically an external magnetic field), and the coupling energy between two qubits can be turned on and off at will.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based). May combine two claims.

    Premisenone given
    § D. Photons · p. 17

    Photons can carry quantum information over long distances, hardly being affected by noise or decoherence.

    “Photons can carry quantum information over long distances, hardly being affected by noise or decoherence.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.

    Premisenone given
    § 1. Hubbard model · p. 19

    The Hubbard model is the simplest model of interacting particles on a lattice, but for large numbers of particles in more than one dimension it is difficult to treat using classical computers.

    “The Hubbard model is the simplest model of interacting particles on a lattice. However, for large numbers of particles in more than one dimensions, the model is difficult to treat using classical computers.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Interpretationnone given
    § VII. APPLICATIONS · p. 18

    In general, with a quantum simulator one could address problems that are either intractable on classical computers or experimentally challenging.

    “In general, with a quantum simulator one could address problems that are either intractable on classical computers or experimentally challenging .”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based). May combine two claims.

    Interpretationnone given
    § F. Current state of the art · p. 17

    Currently only with neutral atoms in an optical lattice is it possible to perform quantum simulations with more than a few particles, and these systems can at present be considered the most advanced platform for AQS.

    “Currently only with neutral atoms in an optical lattice is it possible to perform quantum simulations with more than a few particles, and these systems can at present be considered the most advanced platform for AQS.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based). May combine two claims.

    Premisenone given
    § D. Photons · p. 17

    Photons naturally possess the ability to encode qubit states, e.g. in the polarization of the photon, and one-qubit gates can be easily realized with linear optical components.

    “They naturally possess the ability to encode qubit states, e.g. in the polarization of the photon, and one-qubit gates can be easily realized with linear optical components.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation
    § B. High-energy physics · p. 25

    Zitterbewegung has been simulated with a trapped ion.

    “it has been simulated with a trapped ion (Gerritsma et al. , 2010).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Gerritsma et al. , 2010

      Not checked in the free run.

    • Rests on an assumption: Zitterbewegung has never been observed in its original form with free relativistic particles.
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation
    § E. Other systems · p. 17

    Electrons trapped on the surface of liquid helium could be used for quantum simulation of condensed matter physics, and this setup could be used to simulate the Ising model.

    “Another system that could be used for the quantum simulation of condensed matter physics is electrons trapped on the surface of liquid helium (Mostame and Sch¨ utzhold, 2008). This setup could be used to simulate the Ising model.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Mostame and Sch¨ utzhold, 2008

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation
    § B. High-energy physics · p. 25

    A recent experiment used a superconducting circuit to simulate a massless Klein-Gordon field with tunable speed of propagation, which was used to simulate the generation of photons in the dynamical Casimir effect.

    “A recent experiment (L¨ ahteenm¨ aki et al. , 2013) used a superconducting circuit to simulate a massless Klein-Gordon field with tunable speed of propagation, which was used to simulate the generation of photons in the dynamical casimir effect.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites L¨ ahteenm¨ aki et al. , 2013

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation
    § B. High-energy physics · p. 25

    A quantum simulation of the Klein paradox was recently implemented with trapped ions.

    “A quantum simulation of this phenomenon was recently implemented with trapped ions (Gerritsma et al. , 2011).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Gerritsma et al. , 2011

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation
    § C. Superconducting circuits · p. 16

    Superconducting circuits can be coupled to cavities, which are electrical resonators, and this setup is useful for the study of electric-circuit analogues of cavity quantum electrodynamics (circuit QED).

    “Furthermore, superconducting circuits can be coupled to 'cavities', which are actually electrical resonators (and the 'photons' are, for the most part, electron-density oscillations). This setup is very useful for the study of electric-circuit analogues of cavity quantum electrodynamics (circuit QED) (Schoelkopf and Girvin, 2008; You and Nori, 2005, 2011).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Schoelkopf and Girvin, 2008

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites You and Nori, 2005, 2011

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Premisenone given
    § C. Superconducting circuits · p. 16

    Although macroscopic in size, superconducting circuits can display quantum behavior and can be seen as artificial atoms.

    “Although macroscopic in size, these circuits can display quantum behavior and can be seen as 'artificial atoms'.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Interpretationnone given
    § E. Other systems · p. 17

    NV centers in diamond have not received much attention as potential quantum simulators, which might be due to difficulties in coupling the NV centers to each other and future scalability.

    “Unlike other systems studied in the context of quantum computation, however, NV centers in diamond have not received much attention as potential quantum simulators, which might be due to difficulties in coupling the NV centers to each other and future scalability.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation
    § B. High-energy physics · p. 25

    It is possible to simulate classically the Zitterbewegung of a free Dirac electron in an optical superlattice.

    “it is also possible to simulate classically the Zitterbewegung of a free Dirac electron in an optical superlattice (Dreisow et al. , 2010).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Dreisow et al. , 2010

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based). May combine two claims.

    Interpretationnone given
    § E. Other systems · p. 17

    In principle the liquid-helium electron system could be scaled up, but the control would be very difficult.

    “In principle it could be scaled up, but the control would be very difficult.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Interpretationnone given
    § D. Photons · p. 17

    The difficulty in implementing two-qubit gates is a serious drawback for photonic systems in the context of quantum computation.

    “Although the difficulty in implementing two-qubit gates is a serious drawback for photonic systems in the context of quantum computation, there have been some notable achievements for quantum simulation using photons.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisenone given
    § C. Superconducting circuits · p. 16

    Quantum information can be encoded in superconducting circuits in different ways: in the number of superconducting electrons on a small island, in the direction of a current around a loop, or in oscillatory states of the circuit.

    “Quantum information can be encoded in different ways: in the number of superconducting electrons on a small island, in the direction of a current around a loop, or in oscillatory states of the circuit.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation
    § D. Atomic physics · p. 26

    Both natural atoms and artificial atoms have discrete energy levels and exhibit coherent quantum oscillations between those levels.

    “Both have discrete energy levels and exhibit coherent quantum oscillations between those levels.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites You and Nori, 2005, 2011

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation
    § G. Quantum chaos · p. 28

    The quantum baker's map has an efficient realization in terms of quantum gates.

    “the quantum baker's map, a prototypical example in quantum chaos, has an efficient realization in terms of quantum gates (Schack, 1998).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Schack, 1998

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation
    § E. Quantum chemistry · p. 27

    It was shown how to compute molecular energies using DQS and the required number of qubits was estimated.

    “In (Aspuru-Guzik et al. , 2005) it was shown how to compute molecular energies using DQS and the required number of qubits was estimated (see also Figure 4).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Aspuru-Guzik et al. , 2005

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).

    Premisenone given
    § F. Open quantum systems · p. 27

    Simulating the dynamics of open quantum systems is even more costly than that of closed quantum systems because solving the Lindblad equation requires quadratically more resources than solving the Schrödinger equation for the same physical system.

    “Simulating the dynamics of open quantum systems is even more costly than that of closed quantum systems because solving the Lindblad equation requires quadratically more resources than solving the Schr¨ odinger equation for the same physical system.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation
    § F. Open quantum systems · p. 27

    It was theoretically shown that a driven harmonic oscillator can act as a quantum simulator for the non-Markovian damped harmonic oscillator.

    “In (Piilo and Maniscalco, 2006) it was theoretically shown that a driven harmonic oscillator can act as a quantum simulator for the non-Markovian damped harmonic oscillator.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Piilo and Maniscalco, 2006

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation
    § F. Open quantum systems · p. 27

    Another recent experiment simulated non-Markovian dynamics using a linear-optics setup.

    “Another recent experiment simulated non-markovian Dynamics using a linear-optics setup (Chiuri et al. , 2012).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Chiuri et al. , 2012

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisenone given
    § F. Open quantum systems · p. 27

    Simulating open quantum systems with quantum simulators can be done in two ways.

    “Simulating open quantum systems with quantum simulators can be done in two ways.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation
    § E. Quantum chemistry · p. 27

    Chemical reaction dynamics have been investigated using NMR DQS.

    “More recently, chemical reaction dynamics have been investigated using NMR DQS (Lu et al. , 2011).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Lu et al. , 2011

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation
    § F. Open quantum systems · p. 27

    A simulation of decoherence caused by classical noise that was artificially added to the control signal of a superconducting qubit was reported.

    “A simulation of decoherence caused by classical noise that was artificially added to the control signal of a superconducting qubit was reported in (Li et al. , 2013).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Li et al. , 2013

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation
    § F. Open quantum systems · p. 27

    A recent experiment with trapped ions demonstrated the possibility of engineering open-system dynamics using the dissipative preparation of entangled states.

    “A recent experiment with trapped ions demonstrated the possibility of engineering open-system dynamics using the dissipative preparation of entangled states (Barreiro et al. , 2011).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Barreiro et al. , 2011

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation
    § E. Quantum chemistry · p. 27

    The algorithm for calculating the thermal rate constant would run in polynomial time while any exact classical simulation is bound to exhibit exponential scaling.

    “The algorithm would run in polynomial time while any exact classical simulation is bound to exhibit exponential scaling.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Lidar and Wang, 1999

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation
    § E. Quantum chemistry · p. 27

    The authors of (Smirnov et al., 2007) showed how a quantum dot with one electron can be considered an artificial hydrogen atom and a quantum dot containing four electrons can be viewed as an artificial oxygen atom.

    “The authors showed how a quantum dot with one electron can be considered an artificial hydrogen atom and a quantum dot containing four electrons can be viewed as an artificial oxygen atom.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Smirnov et al. , 2007

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Premisenone given
    § D. Atomic physics · p. 26

    Natural atoms are driven using visible or microwave photons that excite electrons from one state to another, whereas artificial atoms in circuits are driven by currents, voltages, and microwave photons.

    “But whereas natural atoms are driven using visible or microwave photons that excite electrons from one state to another, the artificial atoms in the circuits are driven by currents, voltages, and microwave photons.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Premisenone given
    § D. Atomic physics · p. 26

    Differences between quantum circuits and natural atoms include how strongly each system couples to its environment (weak for atoms, strong for circuits) and the energy scales of the two systems.

    “Differences between quantum circuits and natural atoms include how strongly each system couples to its environment (the coupling is weak for atoms and strong for circuits) and the energy scales of the two systems.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation
    § E. Quantum chemistry · p. 27

    An efficient algorithm for calculating the thermal rate constant was given in (Lidar and Wang, 1999).

    “an efficient algorithm for calculating the thermal rate constant was given in (Lidar and Wang, 1999).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Lidar and Wang, 1999

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation
    § E. Quantum chemistry · p. 27

    The molecular energies of the hydrogen molecule have been calculated using a small photonic DQS.

    “The molecular energies of the hydrogen molecule have been calculated using a small photonic DQS (Lanyon et al. , 2010).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Lanyon et al. , 2010

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationcitation
    § E. Quantum chemistry · p. 27

    The number of qubits scales linearly with the number of basis functions, and the number of gates grows polynomially with the number of qubits, so simulations with a few tens or a hundred qubits would already outperform classical computers.

    “The number of qubits scales linearly with the number of basis functions, and the number of gates grows polynomially with the number of qubits, so simulations with a few tens or a hundred qubits would already outperform classical computers.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Aspuru-Guzik et al. , 2005

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).

    Premisenone given
    § I. Interferometry · p. 28

    These latter phenomena can be realized using quasi-one-dimensional open systems where photons are injected from one side and move towards the opposite side of the device.

    “These latter phenomena can be realized using quasi-one-dimensional open systems where photons are injected from one side and move towards the opposite side of the device.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).

    Interpretationnone given
    § VIII. CONCLUDING REMARKS · p. 31

    For some problems where bulk properties are of interest, individual control and measurement may not be required.

    “for some problems where bulk properties are of interest, individual control and measurement may not be required”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation
    § J. Other applications · p. 28

    It was shown that six to ten qubits would be sufficient for a simulation of the single-particle Schrödinger equation.

    “it was shown that six to ten qubits would be sufficient for a simulation of the single-particle Schr¨ odinger equation.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Benenti and Strini, 2008

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).

    Interpretationnone given
    § VIII. CONCLUDING REMARKS · p. 28

    The demonstration of quantum simulations using more than a few tens of qubits would mark the point where quantum computers (whether digital or analog) surpass their classical counterparts, at least for certain applications.

    “The demonstration of quantum simulations using more than a few tens of qubits would mark the point where quantum computers (whether digital or analog) surpass their classical counterparts, at least for certain applications.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.

    Premisenone given
    § H. Nuclear physics · p. 28

    Several phenomenological models have been developed, one of which is the superfluid model of the atomic nucleus.

    “Several phenomenological models have been developed, one of which is the superfluid model of the atomic nucleus.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Interpretationreasoning
    § VIII. CONCLUDING REMARKS · p. 31

    Progress on the experimental implementation of quantum simulation would be relevant for measurement-based quantum computation.

    “Progress on the experimental implementation of quantum simulation would also be relevant for measurement-based quantum computation.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation
    § VIII. CONCLUDING REMARKS · p. 31

    Adiabatic quantum computation can be viewed as a special case of quantum simulation where the ground state of the simulated Hamiltonian encodes the solution to a computational problem.

    “adiabatic quantum computation can be viewed as a special case of quantum simulation where the ground state of the simulated Hamiltonian encodes the solution to a computational problem”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Farhi et al. , 2001

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Interpretationnone given
    § VIII. CONCLUDING REMARKS · p. 31

    In all proposed quantum simulators, improved controllability and scalability are required.

    “From the experimental point of view, in all proposed quantum simulators improved controllability and scalability are required.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Premisereasoning
    § H. Nuclear physics · p. 28

    Even though N is not as large as in condensed matter physics (N < 300), the calculation of the nuclear force is difficult and therefore nuclear physics simulations require significant computing power.

    “Even though N is not as large as in condensed matter physics (in this case N , the atomic mass number, is smaller than 300), the calculation of the nuclear force is difficult and therefore nuclear physics simulations require significant computing power.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation
    § I. Interferometry · p. 28

    Several recent experiments have demonstrated boson sampling using photons.

    “Several recent experiments have demonstrated boson sampling using photons (Broome et al. , 2013; Crespi et al. , 2013; Spring et al. , 2013; Tillmann et al. , 2013)”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checked
    • cites Broome et al. , 2013

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Crespi et al. , 2013

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Spring et al. , 2013

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisereasoning
    § I. Interferometry · p. 28

    These qubits, operating as tunable mirrors, can change the reflection and transmission coefficients of photons confined in waveguides.

    “These qubits, operating as tunable mirrors, can change the reflection and transmission coefficients of photons confined in waveguides.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S4 (based).

    Interpretationnone given
    § VIII. CONCLUDING REMARKS · p. 28

    Recent theoretical and experimental results on quantum simulation lead us to believe that practical quantum simulators will be built in the near future.

    “Recent theoretical and experimental results on quantum simulation lead us to believe that practical quantum simulators will be built in the near future.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
    • Rests on an assumption: Current theoretical and experimental progress in quantum simulation will continue at a pace sufficient to build practical quantum simulators in the near future.
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation
    § I. Interferometry · p. 28

    Superconducting qubits can be used to perform Landau-Zener-Stückelberg interferometry and Fano and Fabry-Perot interferometry.

    “Superconducting qubits can be used, for example, to perform Landau-Zener-St¨ uckelberg interferometry (Shevchenko et al. , 2010) and Fano and Fabry-Perot interferometry (Ian et al. , 2009; Liao et al. , 2010; Zhou et al. , 2008a).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checked
    • cites Shevchenko et al. , 2010

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Ian et al. , 2009

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Liao et al. , 2010

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisenone given
    § I. Interferometry · p. 28

    The photons interact with either one or two qubits acting as tunable mirrors, controlled by changing the applied electric and/or magnetic fields on the qubits.

    “Along the way, the photons interact with either one or two qubits acting as tunable mirrors, controlled by changing the applied electric and/or magnetic fields on the qubits.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation
    § I. Interferometry · p. 28

    Boson sampling is another interferometry problem that is closely related to quantum simulation.

    “Boson sampling (Aaronson and Arkhipov, 2011) is another interferometry problem that is closely related to quantum simulation.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Aaronson and Arkhipov, 2011

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation
    § J. Other applications · p. 28

    Some recent topics in physics research, such as Majorana fermions, graphene or neutrino oscillations, are now discussed in the context of quantum simulation.

    “Some recent topics in physics research, such as Majorana fermions (Casanova et al. , 2011; You et al. , 2011), graphene (Gibertini et al. , 2009) or neutrino oscillations (Noh et al. , 2012) are now discussed in the context of quantum simulation.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checked
    • cites Casanova et al. , 2011

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites You et al. , 2011

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Gibertini et al. , 2009

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation
    § I. Interferometry · p. 28

    This was among the first experimental realizations of quantum simulation.

    “This was among the first experimental realizations of quantum simulation.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Leibfried et al. , 2002

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation
    § I. Interferometry · p. 28

    Nonlinear interferometers were first investigated in trapped-ion experiments.

    “Nonlinear interferometers were first investigated in trapped-ion experiments (Leibfried et al. , 2002).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Leibfried et al. , 2002

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).

    Interpretationnone given
    § G. Quantum chaos · p. 28

    The kicked Harper model should exhibit observable interesting behavior even with only eight qubits.

    “It should exhibit observable interesting behavior even with only eight qubits.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation
    § G. Quantum chaos · p. 28

    The quantum baker's map has been experimentally realized in NMR and with linear optics.

    “The quantum baker's map has been experimentally realized in NMR (Weinstein et al. , 2002) and with linear optics (Howell and Yeaze, 2000).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Weinstein et al. , 2002

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Howell and Yeaze, 2000

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation
    § J. Other applications · p. 28

    The possibility of simulating the Schrödinger equation on a DQS was first discussed in 1996, with concrete algorithms given in 1998, where a quantum lattice-gas model for the many-particle Schrödinger equation in d dimensions was proposed.

    “The possibility of simulating the Schr¨ odinger equation on a DQS was first discussed in 1996 (Lloyd, 1996), with concrete algorithms given in 1998 (Boghosian and Taylor, 1998a), where a quantum lattice-gas model for the many-particle Schr¨ odinger equation in d dimensions was proposed.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Lloyd, 1996

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Boghosian and Taylor, 1998a

      Not checked in the free run.

130 of 130
  • The authors state this as an assumption.

    The Hamiltonian can be written as a sum of many terms that describe local interactions.

    “We assume that the Hamiltonian can be written as a sum of many terms that describe local interactions:”
  • The authors state this as an assumption.

    There is no restriction in applying one- and two-qubit gates and all qubits of the simulator can be individually addressed and measured.

    “Furthermore, it is usually assumed that there is no restriction in applying one- and two-qubit gates and that all qubits of the simulator can be individually addressed and measured.”
  • The authors state this as an assumption.

    The simulated system and its simulator are very similar.

    “Because the system and simulator are presumed to be very similar”
  • The authors state this as an assumption.

    The Lamb-Dicke parameter η is small.

    “η is the Lamb-Dicke parameter (which is assumed to be small here)”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Initial-state preparation and measurement in AQS have not been thoroughly discussed in the literature.

    “The initial-state preparation and measurement in AQS have not been thoroughly discussed in the literature.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Less attention has been paid in the literature to the scaling of required resources with desired accuracy than to scaling with system size.

    “Compared with the studies on scaling with the system size, less attention has been paid in the literature to the scaling of required resources with desired accuracy.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    There has not been much work in the literature on resource estimation for AQS.

    “There has not been much work in the literature on resource estimation for AQS.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    So far there are few studies investigating how the simulator's imperfections affect the quantum simulation.

    “So far there are few studies investigating how the simulator's imperfections affect the quantum simulation”
  • The authors state this as an assumption.

    The Hamiltonian given for N charge or flux qubits biased at their symmetry points and coupled capacitively or inductively is valid for describing superconducting-circuit quantum simulators.

    “The Hamiltonian for N charge (flux) qubits biased at their symmetry points (which is optimal for quantum coherence) coupled capacitively (inductively) is:”
  • The authors state this as an assumption.

    The Hubbard Hamiltonian given is valid for describing the Fermi-Hubbard model.

    “In (Somma et al. , 2002) it was shown how to obtain the energy spectrum of the Fermi-Hubbard Hamiltonian:”
  • The authors state this as an assumption.

    The spin Hamiltonian form given is valid for describing spin systems.

    “Spin systems are typically described by Hamiltonians of the form”
  • The authors state this as an assumption.

    The quantum Ising model Hamiltonian given is valid for describing the trapped-ion quantum magnet simulation.

    “The system is described by the quantum Ising model. The Hamiltonian for a chain (with two or more spins) is given by”
  • The authors state this as an assumption.

    The Fano-Anderson Hamiltonian given is valid for describing the fermionic Fano-Anderson model.

    “The Fano-Anderson Hamiltonian can be written as follows:”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Current theoretical and experimental progress in quantum simulation will continue at a pace sufficient to build practical quantum simulators in the near future.

    “Recent theoretical and experimental results on quantum simulation lead us to believe that practical quantum simulators will be built in the near future.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Zitterbewegung has never been observed in its original form with free relativistic particles.

    “Zitterbewegung has never been observed in its original form with free relativistic particles”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    The simulation of gauge theories is a very computationally intensive quantum many-body problem.

    “The simulation of gauge theories can be a very computationally intensive quantum many-body problem”
16 of 16

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The most important early application of quantum computers is likely to be the simulation of quantum systems.

    “the most important early application of quantum computers is likely to be the simulation of quantum systems. 40 -42”

    From Quantum algorithms: an overview (2016) · cites this paper as [42]

    The Introduction (p. 2) says quantum simulation could be among the first practical applications in which quantum computers outperform classical computers, and describes its many potential uses. It does not rank simulation as the most important early application. (LLM, conf=0.82)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Quantum simulations have been implemented, in some form, on essentially every technological platform for quantum computing.

    “and quantum simulations have now been implemented, in some form, on essentially every technological platform for quantum computing.”

    From Quantum algorithms: an overview (2016) · cites this paper as [42]

    The Introduction (p. 2) reports proof-of-principle quantum-simulation experiments, and Current state of the art (p. 17) describes results using several platforms. But Other systems (p. 17) describes NV centers as a candidate quantum-computing platform that had received little attention for simulation, while discussing other setups only as proposals. The paper therefore supports implementations on multiple platforms, not the claim that they had occurred on essentially every platform. (LLM, conf=0.85)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Several devices that are publicized under the name 'quantum simulation' are, in fact, analog simulators.

    “Several devices that are publicized in the name 'quantum simulation' are, in fact, analog simulators [63-67].”
  • The development of software platforms such as Rigetti's pyQuil, IBM's QISKit, ETH Zürich's ProjectQ, Google's Cirq, and Xanadu's Strawberry Fields has amplified the synergy between quantum algorithm developers and quantum machines.

    “Fortunately, this synergy has been amplified by the development of software platforms such as Rigetti's pyQuil 389 , IBM's QISKit 390 , ETH Z¨ urich's ProjectQ 391 , Google's Cirq 392 , and Xanadu's Strawberry Fields 393 .”

    From Quantum Chemistry in the Age of Quantum Computing (2019) · cites this paper as [390]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

Each contradiction between two passages listed here was confirmed by an independent check.

  • Claim that only neutral atoms simulate more than a few particles conflicts with ion result

    Major

    The review says only neutral atoms in an optical lattice can currently simulate more than a few particles, but elsewhere reports a trapped-ion simulation with hundreds of ions.

  • Stated inter-qubit distance range excludes the stated ion distances

    Minor

    Figure 16 gives ion separations of 10-50 μm, then summarizes the inter-qubit distances as ranging only from 0.1 to 10 μm.

2 of 2

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

6 of the 398 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 4

  1. Aaronson, S., 2011, Proceedings of the 43rd Annual ACM Symposium on Theory of Computing
  2. Manin, Y., 1980, Computable and Uncomputable
  3. Porras, D., 2005, Laser Phys., 15, 88
  4. 10.1007/s11128-011-0303-5 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Georgescu, I. M., Ashhab, S., & Nori, F.
Affiliations
RIKEN (JP)
Venue
Reviews of Modern Physics
Published
2014-03-10
Volume
86
Issue
1
Pages
153-185
ISSN
  • 0034-6861 (ISSN-L)
  • 1539-0756
OpenAlex
W3037443854
Cited by
2,932
References
398
Citations by year
2026: 195 · 2025: 320 · 2024: 324 · 2023: 313 · 2022: 302 · 2021: 308 · 2020: 242 · 2019: 243 · 2018: 197 · 2017: 145 · 2016: 146 · 2015: 119 · 2014: 58 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 15
FWCI
77.73
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Reviews of Modern Physics (publishedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Funders
Army Research Office
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Cold Atom Physics and Bose-Einstein Condensates
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Quantum Computing Algorithms and Architecture
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Quantum many-body systems
Keywords
quantum simulation, quantum simulators, quantum computing hardware, analog quantum simulation, quantum many-body systems, trapped ions, neutral atoms, polar molecules, superconducting circuits, nuclear spin, quantum chemistry, condensed matter physics

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Claims read by deepseek-v4.1-flash under definition version 3 (extract-v3) on 2026-10-07.

Classified by jev-1.13-20260917 (gold-guideline-v0.2) on 2026-10-07.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review