The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Anxiety and Anxiety Disorders
Abstract
This chapter contains sections titled: Attentional Bias in Anxiety Biased Judgement and Interpretation in Anxiety Memory Bias in Anxiety Accounting for Observed Associations between Selective Information Processing and Anxiety Vulnerability Clinical Implications Acknowledgement References
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
The happy personality: A meta-analysis of 137 personality traits and subjective well-being.
DeNeve, K. M., & Cooper, H. (1998) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037//0033-2909.124.2.197 · Cited by 3,042
An Exploratory Study of Employee Silence: Issues that Employees Don’t Communicate Upward and Why*
Milliken, F. J., Morrison, E. W., & Hewlin, P. F. (2003) · Journal of Management Studies · doi:10.1111/1467-6486.00387 · Cited by 1,671
Krueger, R. F., Hicks, B. M., Patrick, C. J., Carlson, S. R., Iacono, W. G., & McGue, M. (2002) · Journal of Abnormal Psychology · doi:10.1037/0021-843x.111.3.411 · Cited by 1,378
MacLeod, C., Rutherford, E., Campbell, L., Ebsworthy, G., & Holker, L. (2002) · Journal of Abnormal Psychology · doi:10.1037/0021-843x.111.1.107 · Cited by 1,334
Self-citationLyubomirsky, S. (2001) · American Psychologist · doi:10.1037/0003-066x.56.3.239 · Cited by 995
Metadata
- Authors
- MacLeod, C.
- Venue
- Handbook of Cognition and Emotion
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1999-02-25
- Pages
- 447-477
- OpenAlex
- W1591512852
- Cited by
- 596
- References
- 0
- Type
- other
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Anxiety and Anxiety Disorders. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/0470013494.ch22
- The paper
- MacLeod, C. (1999). Anxiety and Anxiety Disorders. Handbook of Cognition and Emotion. https://doi.org/10.1002/0470013494.ch22
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.