The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Chemometrics: Data Analysis for the Laboratory and Chemical Plant
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Self-Driving Laboratories for Chemistry and Materials Science
Tom, G., Schmid, S. P., Baird, S. G., Cao, Y., Darvish, K., Hao, H., Lo, S., Pablo-García, S., Rajaonson, E. M., Skreta, M., et al. (2024) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/acs.chemrev.4c00055 · Cited by 707
Bioprocess optimization using design-of-experiments methodology
Mandenius, C., & Brundin, A. (2008) · Biotechnology Progress · doi:10.1002/btpr.67 · Cited by 422
Individual and gender fingerprints in human body odour
Penn, D. J., Oberzaucher, E., Grammer, K., Fischer, G., Soini, H. A., Wiesler, D., Novotny, M. V., Dixon, S. J., Xu, Y., & Brereton, R. G. (2007) · Journal of The Royal Society Interface · doi:10.1098/rsif.2006.0182 · Cited by 396
Self-citationApplication of Chemometrics in Authentication of Herbal Medicines: A Review
Gad, H. A., El‐Ahmady, S. H., Abou‐Shoer, M. I., & Al‐Azizi, M. M. (2013) · Phytochemical Analysis · doi:10.1002/pca.2378 · Cited by 349
Partial Least Square (PLS) Analysis: Most Favorite Tool in Chemometrics to Build a Calibration Model
Kumar, K. (2021) · Resonance · doi:10.1007/s12045-021-1140-1 · Cited by 62
Metadata
- Authors
- Brereton, R. G.
- Venue
- Wiley eBooks
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2003-01-21
- OpenAlex
- W4247156590
- Cited by
- 842
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 9.43
- Type
- book
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Chemometrics: Data Analysis for the Laboratory and Chemical Plant. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/0470863242
- The paper
- Brereton, R. G. (2003). Chemometrics: Data Analysis for the Laboratory and Chemical Plant. Wiley eBooks. https://doi.org/10.1002/0470863242
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
