The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Assessment of Cell Viability
Abstract
Cell viability may be judged by morphological changes or by changes in membrane permeability and/or physiological state inferred from the exclusion of certain dyes or the uptake and retention of others. This unit presents methods based on dye exclusion, esterase activity, and mitochondrial membrane potential, as well as protocols for determining the pre‐fixation viability of fixed cells either before or after fixation with amine‐reactive dyes suitable for a range of excitation wavelengths. Membrane‐impermeable dead cell and live cell dyes as well as dye‐exclusion procedures for microscopy are also included. Curr. Protoc. Cytom. 64:9.2.1‐9.2.26. © 2013 by John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Guidelines for cell viability assays
Kamiloglu, S., Sari, G., Ozdal, T., & Capanoglu, E. (2020) · Food Frontiers · doi:10.1002/fft2.44 · Cited by 769
Chromatin accessibility profiling by ATAC-seq
Grandi, F. C., Modi, H., Kampman, L., & Corces, M. R. (2022) · Nature Protocols · doi:10.1038/s41596-022-00692-9 · Cited by 557
Montero, M. F., Aristizábal, M., & García Reina, G. (2011) · Journal of Applied Phycology · doi:10.1007/s10811-010-9623-6 · Cited by 112
Martins‐Marques, T., Pinho, M. J., Zuzarte, M., Oliveira, C., Pereira, P., Sluijter, J. P. G., Gomes, C., & Girao, H. (2016) · Journal of Extracellular Vesicles · doi:10.3402/jev.v5.32538 · Cited by 88
Kamalov, J., Carpenter, D. O., & Birman, I. (2011) · Journal of Toxicology · doi:10.1155/2011/796719 · Cited by 11
Metadata
- Authors
- Johnson, S., Nguyen, V., & Coder, D.
- Venue
- Current Protocols in Cytometry
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2013-04
- Volume
- 64
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 9.2.1-9.2.26
- ISSN
- 1934-9297 (ISSN-L)
- 1934-9300
- OpenAlex
- W1603259973
- Cited by
- 199
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 6.32
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Assessment of Cell Viability. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/0471142956.cy0902s64
- The paper
- Johnson, S., Nguyen, V., & Coder, D. (2013). Assessment of Cell Viability. Current Protocols in Cytometry. https://doi.org/10.1002/0471142956.cy0902s64
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
