Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 398

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 111 of the 111 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Cognitive Development

Gelman, Rochel·2002·Stevens' Handbook of Experimental Psychology

Abstract

This chapter interleaves a review of theories of cognitive development with accounts of the nature of concepts. Of central concern is how young children come to share concepts with members of the community they join. Different classes of cognitive development make contact with different theories about the nature of concepts. Learning theories (e.g., associationist, connectionist and systems theories) and stage theories assume that infants and very young children build concepts from simple sensory and perceptual inputs. The speakers' use of words highlights relevant sensory‐perceptual input, the kind that the mind will combine into associative networks, logical structures, or connectionist networks. These in turn can support the induction or construction of true, that is abstract, concepts. Until this happens, the young child cannot help but be perception‐bound. True concepts are characterized in terms of necessary and sufficient conditions, not particular percepts. They also can be continued according to logical rules.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/0471214426.pas0212

Cites

111 of 111 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 111 references

Cited by

Metadata

Authors
Gelman, R.
Venue
Stevens' Handbook of Experimental Psychology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2002-02-21
Volume
29
Issue
1
Pages
297-332
ISSN
0066-4308 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2187291779
Cited by
398
References
111
FWCI
20.42
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Cognitive Development. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/0471214426.pas0212
The paper
Gelman, R. (2002). Cognitive Development. Stevens' Handbook of Experimental Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1002/0471214426.pas0212

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.