The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Principal Component Analysis
Abstract
Principal component analysis is a one-sample technique applied to data with no groupings among the observations and no partitioning of the variables into subvectors y and x. Principal components are concerned only with the core structure of a single sample of observations on p variables. In principal component analysis, we seek to maximize the variance of a linear combination of the variables. For example, the first principal component could be used to rank students on the basis of their scores on achievement tests in English, mathematics, reading, and so on. An average score would provide a single scale on which to compare the students, but with unequal weights in the principal component, we can spread the students out further on the scale and obtain a better ranking. The first principal component is the linear combination with maximal variance. The second principal component is the linear combination with maximal variance in a direction orthogonal to the first principal component, and so on. The first principal component also represents the line that minimizes the total sum of squared perpendicular distances from the points to the line. Principal components are often used as a dimension reduction device to obtain a smaller number of variables for input to another analysis. Another useful dimension reduction device is to evaluate the first two principal components for each observation vector and construct a scatter plot to check for multivariate normality, outliers, and so on. The properties of principal components can be interpreted either geometrically or algebraically. Principal components are orthogonal because they are formed with eigenvectors of the covariance (or correlation) matrix, which is symmetric. Principal components are not scale invariant because a scale chance in one of the variables leads to a change in the shape of the swarm of points in the sample. Since principal components are not scale invariant, the components extracted from a covariance matrix differ from those obtained from the corresponding correlation matrix. In fact, the components of a given correlation matrix will serve for other correlation matrices. There are four common methods that can be used to decide how many components to retain in order to effectively summarize the data. Three of the four methods are based on the eigenvalues of the covariance matrix (or correlation matrix). Because of the lack of scale invariance of principal components from the covariance matrix, the coefficients cannot be converted to standardized form, as can be done with coefficients in discriminant functions in Chapter 8 and canonical variates in Chapter 11. Hence we use the coefficients themselves for interpretation. We must choose between the covariance matrix or the correlation matrix, knowing they will yield a different interpretation. One aid to interpretation is to note that for certain patterns of elements in the covariance matrix or the correlation matrix, the form of the principal components can be predicted. For example, if one variable has a much larger variance than the other variables, this variable will dominate the first component, which will account for most of the variance. Another case in which a component will duplicate a variable occurs when the variable is uncorrelated with the other variables. In some settings, the principal components can be interpreted as measures of size and shape. Various methods of selecting a subset of variables are discussed. Since there is no grouping variable or dependent variable in the setting of principal components, we wish to find the subst that best captures the internal variation and covariation of the variables. As usual, examples and problems amply illustrate the techniques in this chapter.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Histopathological Image Analysis: A Review
Gurcan, M. N., Boucheron, L. E., Can, A., Madabhushi, A., Rajpoot, N. M., & Yener, B. (2009) · IEEE Reviews in Biomedical Engineering · doi:10.1109/rbme.2009.2034865 · Cited by 2,052
Statistical challenges of high-dimensional data
Johnstone, I. M., & Titterington, D. M. (2009) · Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences · doi:10.1098/rsta.2009.0159 · Cited by 417
The Role of Knowledge Economy in African Business
Tchamyou, V. S. (2017) · Journal of the Knowledge Economy · doi:10.1007/s13132-016-0417-1 · Cited by 382
(2019) · NORA - Norwegian Open Research Archives · Cited by 291
Fault Diagnosis and Reconfiguration for Multilevel Inverter Drive Using AI-Based Techniques
Khomfoi, S., & Tolbert, L. M. (2007) · IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics · doi:10.1109/tie.2007.906994 · Cited by 284
Metadata
- Venue
- Wiley Series in Probability and Statistics
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2002-02-22
- Pages
- 380-407
- ISSN
- 1940-6347 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W3145074154
- Cited by
- 1,656
- References
- 0
- Type
- other
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Principal Component Analysis. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/0471271357.ch12
- The paper
- Principal Component Analysis. (2002). Wiley Series in Probability and Statistics. https://doi.org/10.1002/0471271357.ch12
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.