Fault Diagnosis and Reconfiguration for Multilevel Inverter Drive Using AI-Based Techniques
Abstract
A fault diagnostic and reconfiguration method for a cascaded H-bridge multilevel inverter drive (MLID) using artificial-intelligence-based techniques is proposed in this paper. Output phase voltages of the MLID are used as diagnostic signals to detect faults and their locations. It is difficult to diagnose an MLID system using a mathematical model because MLID systems consist of many switching devices and their system complexity has a nonlinear factor. Therefore, a neural network (NN) classification is applied to the fault diagnosis of an MLID system. Multilayer perceptron networks are used to identify the type and location of occurring faults. The principal component analysis is utilized in the feature extraction process to reduce the NN input size. A lower dimensional input space will also usually reduce the time necessary to train an NN, and the reduced noise can improve the mapping performance. The genetic algorithm is also applied to select the valuable principal components. The proposed network is evaluated with simulation test set and experimental test set. The overall classification performance of the proposed network is more than 95%. A reconfiguration technique is also proposed. The proposed fault diagnostic system requires about six cycles to clear an open-circuit or short-circuit fault. The experimental results show that the proposed system performs satisfactorily to detect the fault type, fault location, and reconfiguration.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The proposed fault diagnosis method can detect the fault in six cycles using the output phase voltage data.
“The proposed method can detect the fault in six cycles using the output phase voltage data.”
From A Review of Multilevel Inverter Topologies in Electric Vehicles: Current Status and Future Trends (2021) · cites this paper as [102]
Cited by
Sorted by citations
An Overview of Artificial Intelligence Applications for Power Electronics
Zhao, S., Blaabjerg, F., & Wang, H. (2021) · IEEE Transactions on Power Electronics · doi:10.1109/tpel.2020.3024914 · Cited by 947 · see citing works
Ageing and Failure Modes of IGBT Modules in High-Temperature Power Cycling
Smet, V., Forest, F., Huselstein, J.-J., Richardeau, F., Khatir, Z., Lefebvre, S., & Berkani, M. (2011) · IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics · doi:10.1109/tie.2011.2114313 · Cited by 620 · see citing works
Survey of fault-tolerance techniques for three-phase voltage source inverters
Mirafzal, B. (2014) · IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics · doi:10.1109/tie.2014.2301712 · Cited by 440 · see citing works
A Review of Multilevel Inverter Topologies in Electric Vehicles: Current Status and Future Trends
Poorfakhraei, A., Narimani, M., & Emadi, A. (2021) · IEEE Open Journal of Power Electronics · doi:10.1109/ojpel.2021.3063550 · Cited by 424 · see citing works
“A fault diagnosis technique, capable of detecting and locating the short-circuit and open-circuit faults is proposed for CHB inverter in [102].”
MethodOverview of Real-Time Lifetime Prediction and Extension for SiC Power Converters
Ni, Z., Lyu, X., Yadav, O. P., Singh, B. N., Zheng, S., & Cao, D. (2020) · IEEE Transactions on Power Electronics · doi:10.1109/tpel.2019.2962503 · Cited by 261 · see citing works
Smet, V., Forest, F., Huselstein, J.-J., Rashed, A., & Richardeau, F. (2013) · IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics · doi:10.1109/tie.2012.2196894 · Cited by 232 · see citing works
- Authors
- Khomfoi, S., & Tolbert, L. M.
- Affiliations
- King Mongkut's Institute of Technology Ladkrabang (TH)
- University of Tennessee at Knoxville (US)
- Venue
- IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics
- Published
- 2007-12
- Volume
- 54
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 2954-2968
- ISSN
- 0278-0046 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2168344259
- Cited by
- 284
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 6 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 16 · 2023: 15 · 2022: 20 · 2021: 19 · 2020: 24 · 2019: 23 · 2018: 17 · 2017: 18 · 2016: 23 · 2015: 17 · 2014: 16 · 2013: 11 · 2012: 12
- FWCI
- 9.14
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Multilevel Inverters and Converters
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Control and Systems Engineering › Machine Fault Diagnosis Techniques
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Control and Systems Engineering › Fault Detection and Control Systems
- Keywords
- fault diagnosis, fault reconfiguration, cascaded H-bridge inverter, neural network classification, multilayer perceptron, principal component analysis, genetic algorithm feature selection, fault location detection, open-circuit fault, short-circuit faults
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review