Cited by 284Multilevel Inverters and ConvertersMachine Fault Diagnosis TechniquesFault Detection and Control Systems

Fault Diagnosis and Reconfiguration for Multilevel Inverter Drive Using AI-Based Techniques

Khomfoi, Surin, Tolbert, Leon M.·2007·IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics

Abstract

A fault diagnostic and reconfiguration method for a cascaded H-bridge multilevel inverter drive (MLID) using artificial-intelligence-based techniques is proposed in this paper. Output phase voltages of the MLID are used as diagnostic signals to detect faults and their locations. It is difficult to diagnose an MLID system using a mathematical model because MLID systems consist of many switching devices and their system complexity has a nonlinear factor. Therefore, a neural network (NN) classification is applied to the fault diagnosis of an MLID system. Multilayer perceptron networks are used to identify the type and location of occurring faults. The principal component analysis is utilized in the feature extraction process to reduce the NN input size. A lower dimensional input space will also usually reduce the time necessary to train an NN, and the reduced noise can improve the mapping performance. The genetic algorithm is also applied to select the valuable principal components. The proposed network is evaluated with simulation test set and experimental test set. The overall classification performance of the proposed network is more than 95%. A reconfiguration technique is also proposed. The proposed fault diagnostic system requires about six cycles to clear an open-circuit or short-circuit fault. The experimental results show that the proposed system performs satisfactorily to detect the fault type, fault location, and reconfiguration.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/tie.2007.906994

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Khomfoi, S., & Tolbert, L. M.
Affiliations
  • King Mongkut's Institute of Technology Ladkrabang (TH)
  • University of Tennessee at Knoxville (US)
Venue
IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics
Published
2007-12
Volume
54
Issue
6
Pages
2954-2968
ISSN
0278-0046 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2168344259
Cited by
284
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 16 · 2023: 15 · 2022: 20 · 2021: 19 · 2020: 24 · 2019: 23 · 2018: 17 · 2017: 18 · 2016: 23 · 2015: 17 · 2014: 16 · 2013: 11 · 2012: 12
FWCI
9.14
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Multilevel Inverters and Converters
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Control and Systems Engineering › Machine Fault Diagnosis Techniques
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Control and Systems Engineering › Fault Detection and Control Systems
Keywords
fault diagnosis, fault reconfiguration, cascaded H-bridge inverter, neural network classification, multilayer perceptron, principal component analysis, genetic algorithm feature selection, fault location detection, open-circuit fault, short-circuit faults

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review