The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Analysis of Categorical Data
Abstract
This chapter contains sections titled: Introduction Statistical Inference for One Sample Inference of Independent Samples Ordered Categorical Data Combining Categorical Data Model-Based Methods Repeated Categorical Data Discussion
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
CLAYTON, D. G. (1978) · Biometrika · doi:10.1093/biomet/65.1.141 · Cited by 2,113
Plackett, R. L. (1975) · Applied Statistics · doi:10.2307/2346567 · Cited by 731
Human reactions to low concentrations of volatile organic compounds
Mølhave, L., Bach, B., & Pedersen, O. F. (1986) · Environment International · doi:10.1016/0160-4120(86)90027-9 · Cited by 441
Tests for Detecting Overdispersion in Poisson Regression Models
Dean, C., & Lawless, J. F. (1989) · Journal of the American Statistical Association · doi:10.1080/01621459.1989.10478792 · Cited by 342
Eysenck, H. J., Grossarth-Maticek, R., & Everitt, B. (1991) · Integrative Physiological and Behavioral Science · doi:10.1007/bf02691067 · Cited by 44
Retracted
Metadata
- Venue
- Wiley Series in Probability and Statistics
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2003-11-24
- Pages
- 339-385
- ISSN
- 1940-6347 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2329977458
- Cited by
- 222
- References
- 0
- Type
- other
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Analysis of Categorical Data. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/0471473286.ch9
- The paper
- Analysis of Categorical Data. (2003). Wiley Series in Probability and Statistics. https://doi.org/10.1002/0471473286.ch9
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
