Energy and protein intake in pregnancy
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Gestational weight gain is positively associated with fetal growth, and observational studies of food supplementation in pregnancy have reported increases in gestational weight gain and fetal growth. OBJECTIVES: To assess the effects of advice to increase or reduce energy or protein intake, or of actual energy or protein supplementation or restriction, during pregnancy on energy and protein intakes, gestational weight gain, and the outcome of pregnancy. SEARCH STRATEGY: We searched the Cochrane Pregnancy and Childbirth Group trials register (October 2002) and contacted researchers in the field. SELECTION CRITERIA: Acceptably controlled trials of dietary advice to increase or reduce energy or protein intake, or of actual energy or protein supplementation or restriction, during pregnancy. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Data were extracted by the authors from published reports, and supplemented by additional information from trialists contacted by the authors. MAIN RESULTS: In five trials involving 1134 women, nutritional advice to increase energy and protein intakes was successful in achieving those goals, but no consistent benefit was observed on pregnancy outcomes. In 13 trials involving 4665 women, balanced energy/protein supplementation was associated with modest increases in maternal weight gain and in mean birth weight, and a substantial reduction in risk of small-for-gestational-age (SGA) birth. These effects did not appear greater in undernourished women. No significant effects were detected on preterm birth, but significantly reduced risks were observed for stillbirth and neonatal death. In two trials involving 1076 women, high-protein supplementation was associated with a small, nonsignificant increase in maternal weight gain but a nonsignificant reduction in mean birthweight, a significantly increased risk of SGA birth, and a nonsignificantly increased risk of neonatal death. In 3 trials involving 966 women, isocaloric protein supplementation was also associated with an increased risk of SGA birth. In three trials involving 384 women, energy/protein restriction of pregnant women who were overweight or exhibited high weight gain significantly reduced weekly maternal weight gain and mean birth weight but had no effect on pregnancy-induced hypertension or pre-eclampsia. REVIEWER'S CONCLUSIONS: Dietary advice appears effective in increasing pregnant women's energy and protein intakes but is unlikely to confer major benefits on infant or maternal health. Balanced energy/protein supplementation improves fetal growth and may reduce the risk of fetal and neonatal death. High-protein or balanced protein supplementation alone is not beneficial and may be harmful to the infant.Protein/energy restriction of pregnant women who are overweight or exhibit high weight gain is unlikely to be beneficial and may be harmful to the infant.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Observational studies in humans have shown that low protein consumption during pregnancy correlates with fetal growth restriction.
“Observational studies in humans have shown that low protein consumption during pregnancy correlates with fetal growth restriction [69].”
From Developmental programming of offspring adipose tissue biology and obesity risk (2021) · cites this paper as [69]
Cites
Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions: Cochrane Book Series
(2008) · doi:10.1002/9780470712184 · Cited by 25,048 · see citing works
Effect of a low-glycemic-index diet during pregnancy on obstetric outcomes
Moses, R. G., Luebcke, M., Davis, W. S., Coleman, K. J., Tapsell, L. C., Petocz, P., & Brand-Miller, J. C. (2006) · The American Journal of Clinical Nutrition · doi:10.1093/ajcn/84.4.807 · Cited by 219 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Bhutta, Z. A., Das, J. K., Rizvi, A., Gaffey, M. F., Walker, N., Horton, S., Webb, P., Lartey, A., & Black, R. E. (2013) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(13)60996-4 · Cited by 3,093 · see citing works
Developmental Origins of the Metabolic Syndrome: Prediction, Plasticity, and Programming
Mcmillen, I. C., & Robinson, J. S. (2005) · Physiological Reviews · doi:10.1152/physrev.00053.2003 · Cited by 1,910 · see citing works
The double burden of malnutrition: aetiological pathways and consequences for health
Wells, J. C., Sawaya, A. L., Wibaek, R., Mwangome, M., Poullas, M. S., Yajnik, C. S., & Demaio, A. (2020) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(19)32472-9 · Cited by 993 · see citing works
New Approaches to Preventing, Diagnosing, and Treating Neonatal Sepsis
Edmond, K., & Zaidi, A. (2010) · PLoS Medicine · doi:10.1371/journal.pmed.1000213 · Cited by 213 · see citing works
Non-placental causes of intrauterine growth restriction
Hendrix, N., & Berghella, V. (2008) · Seminars in Perinatology · doi:10.1053/j.semperi.2008.02.004 · Cited by 188 · see citing works
Diagnosis and management of fetal growth restriction
Bamfo, J. E. A. K., & Odibo, A. O. (2011) · Journal of Pregnancy · doi:10.1155/2011/640715 · Cited by 178 · see citing works
The Elevated Susceptibility to Diabetes in India: An Evolutionary Perspective
Wells, J. C. K., Pomeroy, E., Walimbe, S. R., Popkin, B. M., & Yajnik, C. S. (2016) · Frontiers in Public Health · doi:10.3389/fpubh.2016.00145 · Cited by 155 · see citing works
Rayco-Solon, P., Fulford, A. J., & Prentice, A. M. (2005) · The American Journal of Clinical Nutrition · doi:10.1093/ajcn/81.1.134 · Cited by 158 · see citing works
Barham, T. (2011) · Journal of Development Economics · doi:10.1016/j.jdeveco.2010.01.003 · Cited by 133 · see citing works
Developmental programming of offspring adipose tissue biology and obesity risk
Rodgers, A., & Sferruzzi-Perri, A. N. (2021) · International Journal of Obesity · doi:10.1038/s41366-021-00790-w · Cited by 57 · see citing works
- Authors
- Kramer, M. S., & Kakuma, R.
- Affiliations
- McGill University (CA)
- Centre for Addiction and Mental Health (CA)
- Venue
- Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews
- Publisher
- John Wiley & Sons, Ltd
- Published
- 2003-10-20
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- CD000032-CD000032
- ISSN
- 1361-6137 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1550015617
- Cited by
- 431
- References
- 2
- Citations by year
- 2026: 4 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 16 · 2020: 20 · 2019: 13 · 2018: 12 · 2017: 14 · 2016: 27 · 2015: 22 · 2014: 14 · 2013: 26 · 2012: 33
- Type
- reference entry
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Obstetrics and Gynecology › Gestational Diabetes Research and Management
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Birth, Development, and Health
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Maternal and Neonatal Healthcare
- Keywords
- energy intake, protein intake, pregnancy, gestational weight gain, dietary supplementation, protein supplementation, caloric restriction, fetal growth, birth weight, small-for-gestational-age birth, preterm birth, stillbirth, neonatal death, gestational hypertension, preeclampsia, maternal overweight, dietary recommendations, pregnancy outcomes, infant health, maternal health
- MeSH terms
- Energy Intake, Female, Embryonic and Fetal Development, Humans, Pregnancy, Pregnancy Outcome, Weight Gain, Dietary Supplements
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review