Cited by 431Gestational Diabetes Research and ManagementBirth, Development, and HealthMaternal and Neonatal Healthcare

Energy and protein intake in pregnancy

Kramer, Michael S, Kakuma, Ritsuko·2003·Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Gestational weight gain is positively associated with fetal growth, and observational studies of food supplementation in pregnancy have reported increases in gestational weight gain and fetal growth. OBJECTIVES: To assess the effects of advice to increase or reduce energy or protein intake, or of actual energy or protein supplementation or restriction, during pregnancy on energy and protein intakes, gestational weight gain, and the outcome of pregnancy. SEARCH STRATEGY: We searched the Cochrane Pregnancy and Childbirth Group trials register (October 2002) and contacted researchers in the field. SELECTION CRITERIA: Acceptably controlled trials of dietary advice to increase or reduce energy or protein intake, or of actual energy or protein supplementation or restriction, during pregnancy. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Data were extracted by the authors from published reports, and supplemented by additional information from trialists contacted by the authors. MAIN RESULTS: In five trials involving 1134 women, nutritional advice to increase energy and protein intakes was successful in achieving those goals, but no consistent benefit was observed on pregnancy outcomes. In 13 trials involving 4665 women, balanced energy/protein supplementation was associated with modest increases in maternal weight gain and in mean birth weight, and a substantial reduction in risk of small-for-gestational-age (SGA) birth. These effects did not appear greater in undernourished women. No significant effects were detected on preterm birth, but significantly reduced risks were observed for stillbirth and neonatal death. In two trials involving 1076 women, high-protein supplementation was associated with a small, nonsignificant increase in maternal weight gain but a nonsignificant reduction in mean birthweight, a significantly increased risk of SGA birth, and a nonsignificantly increased risk of neonatal death. In 3 trials involving 966 women, isocaloric protein supplementation was also associated with an increased risk of SGA birth. In three trials involving 384 women, energy/protein restriction of pregnant women who were overweight or exhibited high weight gain significantly reduced weekly maternal weight gain and mean birth weight but had no effect on pregnancy-induced hypertension or pre-eclampsia. REVIEWER'S CONCLUSIONS: Dietary advice appears effective in increasing pregnant women's energy and protein intakes but is unlikely to confer major benefits on infant or maternal health. Balanced energy/protein supplementation improves fetal growth and may reduce the risk of fetal and neonatal death. High-protein or balanced protein supplementation alone is not beneficial and may be harmful to the infant.Protein/energy restriction of pregnant women who are overweight or exhibit high weight gain is unlikely to be beneficial and may be harmful to the infant.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/14651858.cd000032

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Observational studies in humans have shown that low protein consumption during pregnancy correlates with fetal growth restriction.

    “Observational studies in humans have shown that low protein consumption during pregnancy correlates with fetal growth restriction [69].”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Kramer, M. S., & Kakuma, R.
Affiliations
  • McGill University (CA)
  • Centre for Addiction and Mental Health (CA)
Venue
Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews
Published
2003-10-20
Issue
2
Pages
CD000032-CD000032
ISSN
1361-6137 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1550015617
Cited by
431
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 16 · 2020: 20 · 2019: 13 · 2018: 12 · 2017: 14 · 2016: 27 · 2015: 22 · 2014: 14 · 2013: 26 · 2012: 33
Type
reference entry
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Obstetrics and Gynecology › Gestational Diabetes Research and Management
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Birth, Development, and Health
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Maternal and Neonatal Healthcare
Keywords
energy intake, protein intake, pregnancy, gestational weight gain, dietary supplementation, protein supplementation, caloric restriction, fetal growth, birth weight, small-for-gestational-age birth, preterm birth, stillbirth, neonatal death, gestational hypertension, preeclampsia, maternal overweight, dietary recommendations, pregnancy outcomes, infant health, maternal health
MeSH terms
Energy Intake, Female, Embryonic and Fetal Development, Humans, Pregnancy, Pregnancy Outcome, Weight Gain, Dietary Supplements

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review