Cited by 219Gestational Diabetes Research and ManagementBirth, Development, and HealthNutritional Studies and Diet

Effect of a low-glycemic-index diet during pregnancy on obstetric outcomes

Open access
Moses, Robert G, Luebcke, Megan, Davis, Warren S, Coleman, Keith J, Tapsell, Linda C, Petocz, Peter, Brand-Miller, Jennie C·2006·The American Journal of Clinical Nutrition

Abstract

Background Pregnancy is a condition in which the glycemic index (GI) may be of particular relevance because maternal glucose is the main energy substrate for intrauterine growth. Objective The aim was to compare the effects of low-GI and conventional dietary strategies on pregnancy outcomes in healthy women. Compliance and acceptability were also investigated. Design The subjects were assigned alternately to receive dietary counseling that encouraged either low-GI (LGI) carbohydrate foods or high-fiber, moderate-to-high GI (HGI) foods and were studied 5 times between <16 wk gestation and delivery. Of the 70 women who met the inclusion criteria, 62 completed the study (32 in the LGI and 30 in the HGI groups). Primary outcomes were measures of fetal size. Results The mean diet GI fell significantly in the LGI group but not in the HGI group. Compared with the LGI group, women in the HGI group gave birth to infants who were heavier (3408 +/- 78 compared with 3644 +/- 90 g; P = 0.051) and had a higher birth centile (48 +/- 5 compared with 69 +/- 5; P = 0.005), a higher ponderal index (2.62 +/- 0.04 compared with 2.74 +/- 0.04; P = 0.03), and a higher prevalence of large-for-gestational age (3.1% compared with 33.3%; P = 0.01). Women in the LGI group found the diet easier to follow. Conclusion Because birth weight and ponderal index may predict chronic disease in later life, a low-GI diet may favorably influence long-term outcomes.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/ajcn/84.4.807

Cites

27 of 27 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 28 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Moses, R. G., Luebcke, M., Davis, W. S., Coleman, K. J., Tapsell, L. C., Petocz, P., & Brand-Miller, J. C.
Affiliations
The University of Sydney (AU)
Corresponding author
Moses, Robert G
Venue
The American Journal of Clinical Nutrition
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2006-10
Volume
84
Issue
4
Pages
807-812
ISSN
0002-9165 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2136620978
Cited by
219
References
28
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 15 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 11 · 2016: 15 · 2015: 15 · 2014: 16 · 2013: 20 · 2012: 25
FWCI
10.54
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • American Journal of Clinical Nutrition (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • UCLA - Biblioteca de Ciencias de la Salud (submittedVersion)
  • Research Online (University of Wollongong) (submittedVersion)
  • Figshare (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Obstetrics and Gynecology › Gestational Diabetes Research and Management
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Birth, Development, and Health
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Nutritional Studies and Diet
Keywords
low glycemic index diet, pregnancy, nutrition counseling, fetal growth, birth weight, large for gestational age, ponderal index, dietary adherence, maternal blood glucose, high-fiber diet
MeSH terms
Adult, Birth Weight, Feeding Behavior, Female, Humans, Mothers, Pregnancy, Pregnancy Outcome, Pregnancy Trimester, First, Pregnancy Trimester, Second, Weight Gain, Glycemic Index

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review