The DOI matches its Crossref record; 33 of the 33 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
External cephalic version for breech presentation before term
Open accessAbstract
BACKGROUND: External cephalic version (ECV) of the breech fetus at term (after 37 weeks) has been shown to be effective in reducing the number of breech presentations and caesarean sections, but the rates of success are relatively low. This review examines studies initiating ECV prior to term (before 37 weeks' gestation). OBJECTIVES: To assess the effectiveness of a policy of beginning ECV before term (before 37 weeks' gestation) for breech presentation on fetal presentation at birth, method of delivery, and the rate of preterm birth, perinatal morbidity, stillbirth or neonatal mortality. SEARCH METHODS: We searched the Cochrane Pregnancy and Childbirth Group's Trials Register (31 March 2015) and reference lists of retrieved studies. SELECTION CRITERIA: Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) of ECV attempted before term (37 weeks' gestation) or commenced before term, compared with a control group of women (in breech presentation) in which either no ECV attempted or ECV was attempted at term. Cluster-randomised trials were eligible for inclusion but none were identified. Quasi-RCTs or studies using a cross-over design were not eligible for inclusion. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Two review authors independently assessed trials for inclusion and risk of bias, extracted data and checked for accuracy. Studies were assessed for risk of bias and for important outcomes the overall quality of the evidence was assessed using the GRADE approach. MAIN RESULTS: Five studies are included (2187 women). It was not possible for the intervention to be blinded, and it is not clear what impact lack of blinding would have on the outcomes reported. For other 'Risk of bias' domains studies were either at low or unclear risk of bias.One study reported on ECV that was undertaken and completed before 37 weeks' gestation compared with no ECV. No difference was found in the rate of non-cephalic presentation at birth (risk ratio (RR) 1.04, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.64 to 1.69; participants = 102). One study reported on a policy of ECV that was initiated before term (33 weeks) and up until 40 weeks' gestation and which could be repeated up until delivery compared with no ECV. This study showed a decrease in the rate of non-cephalic presentation at birth (RR 0.59, 95% CI 0.45 to 0.77; participants = 179).Three studies reported on ECV started at between 34 to 35 weeks' gestation compared with beginning at 37 to 38 weeks' gestation. Pooled results suggested that early ECV reduced the risk of non-cephalic presentation at birth (RR 0.81, 95% CI 0.74 to 0.90; participants = 1906; studies = three; I² = 0%, evidence graded high quality), failure to achieve vaginal cephalic birth (RR 0.90, 95% CI 0.83 to 0.97; participants = 1888; studies = three; I² = 0%, evidence graded high quality), and vaginal breech delivery (RR 0.44, 95% CI 0.25 to 0.78; participants = 1888; studies = three; I² = 0%, evidence graded high quality). The difference between groups for risk of caesarean was not statistically significant (RR 0.92, 95% CI 0.85 to 1.00; participants = 1888; studies = three; I² = 0%, evidence graded high quality). There was evidence that risk of preterm labour was increased with early ECV compared with ECV after 37 weeks (6.6% in the ECV group and 4.3% for controls) (RR 1.51, 95% CI 1.03 to 2.21; participants = 1888; studies = three; I² = 0%, evidence graded high quality). There was no clear difference between groups for low infant Apgar score at five minutes or perinatal death (stillbirth plus neonatal mortality up to seven days) (evidence graded as low quality for both outcomes). AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: Compared with no ECV attempt, ECV commenced before term reduces non-cephalic presentation at birth. Compared with ECV at term, beginning ECV at between 34 to 35 weeks may have some benefit in terms of decreasing the rate of non-cephalic presentation, and risk of vaginal breech birth. However, early ECV may increase risk of late preterm birth, and it is important that any future research reports infant morbidity outcomes. Results of the review suggest that there is a need for careful discussion with women about the timing of the ECV procedure so that they can make informed decisions.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions Version 5.0.1. The Cochrane Collaboration
Higgins, J., Green, S. R., & Higgins, J. (2008) · Cited by 5,544
Meta-analyses involving cross-over trials: methodological issues
Elbourne, D. R., Altman, D. G., Higgins, J. P., Curtin, F., Worthington, H. V., & Vail, A. (2002) · International Journal of Epidemiology · doi:10.1093/ije/31.1.140 · Cited by 2,305
Hannah, M. E., Hannah, W. J., Hewson, S. A., Hodnett, E. D., Saigal, S., & Willan, A. R. (2000) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(00)02840-3 · Cited by 1,556
Effective Care in Pregnancy and Childbirth
Paintin, D. B. (1990) · BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology · doi:10.1111/j.1471-0528.1990.tb02464.x · Cited by 1,330
Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd
Modarresi, O. A. F., & Shakibaie, M. M. M. R. (2015) · Cited by 1,111
Liu, S., Liston, R. M., Joseph, K. S., Heaman, M., Sauve, R., Kramer, M. S., & for the Maternal Health Study Group of the Canadian Perinatal Surveillance System (2007) · Canadian Medical Association Journal · doi:10.1503/cmaj.060870 · Cited by 871
Planned caesarean section for term breech delivery
Hofmeyr, G. J., Hannah, M., & Lawrie, T. A. (2015) · Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews · doi:10.1002/14651858.cd000166.pub2 · Cited by 370
Self-citationElective Primary Cesarean Delivery
Minkoff, H., & Chervenak, F. A. (2003) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmsb022734 · Cited by 305
Few women wish to be delivered by caesarean section
Hildingsson, I. (2002) · BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology · doi:10.1016/s1470-0328(02)01393-9 · Cited by 294
Maternal mortality and mode of delivery
Hall, M. H., & Bewley, S. (1999) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(05)76016-5 · Cited by 250
Cited by
Renfrew, M. J., McFadden, A., Bastos, M. H., Campbell, J., Channon, A. A., Cheung, N. F., Silva, D. R. A. D., Downe, S., Kennedy, H. P., Malata, A., et al. (2014) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(14)60789-3 · Cited by 1,297
Interventions to reduce unnecessary caesarean sections in healthy women and babies
Betrán, A. P., Temmerman, M., Kingdon, C., Mohiddin, A., Opiyo, N., Torloni, M. R., Zhang, J., Musana, O., Wanyonyi, S. Z., Gülmezoglu, A. M., et al. (2018) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(18)31927-5 · Cited by 600
Planned caesarean section for term breech delivery
Hofmeyr, G. J., Hannah, M., & Lawrie, T. A. (2015) · Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews · doi:10.1002/14651858.cd000166.pub2 · Cited by 370
Self-citationMCINTYRE, S., TAITZ, D., KEOGH, J., GOLDSMITH, S., BADAWI, N., & BLAIR, E. (2013) · Developmental Medicine & Child Neurology · doi:10.1111/dmcn.12017 · Cited by 362
Obstetric care in low-resource settings: what, who, and how to overcome challenges to scale up?
Hofmeyr, G. J., Haws, R. A., Bergström, S., Lee, A. C., Okong, P., Darmstadt, G. L., Mullany, L. C., Oo, E. K. S., & Lawn, J. E. (2009) · International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics · doi:10.1016/j.ijgo.2009.07.017 · Cited by 224
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Hutton, E. K., & Hofmeyr, G. J.
- Venue
- Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews
- Publisher
- John Wiley & Sons, Ltd
- Published
- 2006-01-25
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- CD000084-CD000084
- ISSN
- 1361-6137 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2162763650
- Cited by
- 317
- References
- 33
- Type
- reference entry
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: External cephalic version for breech presentation before term. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/14651858.cd000084.pub2
- The paper
- Hutton, E. K., & Hofmeyr, G. J. (2006). External cephalic version for breech presentation before term. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.cd000084.pub2
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.