Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 312

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Ribavirin for respiratory syncytial virus infection of the lower respiratory tract in infants and young children

Open access
Ventre, Kathleen, Randolph, Adrienne·2007·Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) is a common cause of lower respiratory tract infection in infants and is responsible for many hospitalizations annually. Ribavirin is approved for treatment of these infections, but its use is controversial because of questions about its efficacy, concerns about occupational exposure, and its high cost. OBJECTIVES: The objective of this review is to assess the efficacy of aerosolized ribavirin for infants and children with lower respiratory tract infection due to RSV. SEARCH STRATEGY: We performed an updated electronic search of the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), the Database of Abstracts of Reviews of Effects (DARE) and the NHS Economic Evaluation Database (EED) (The Cochrane Library 2006, issue 3) which contains the Acute Respiratory Infections Group's specialized register; MEDLINE (Ovid) (2004 to September Week 3 2006); and EMBASE (WebSpirs) (2004 to June 2006). SELECTION CRITERIA: Randomized trials comparing ribavirin with placebo in infants and children with lower respiratory tract infection attributable to RSV. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Two review authors independently extracted data and assessed trial quality. Unpublished data were requested from trial authors when necessary. MAIN RESULTS: Twelve trials were included. All trials enrolled infants below the age of six months. In four trials with 158 participants, mortality with ribavirin was 5.8% compared with 9.7% with placebo (odds ratio (OR) 0.58; 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.18 to 1.85). In three trials with 116 participants the probability of respiratory deterioration with ribavirin was 7.1% compared with 18.3% with placebo (OR 0.37; 95% CI 0.12 to 1.18). In three studies with 104 ventilated participants, the mean difference in days of hospitalization was 1.9 fewer days with ribavirin (95% CI -4.6 to +0.9) and the mean difference in days of ventilation was 1.8 fewer days with ribavirin (95% CI -3.4 to -0.2). No statistically significant differences in long-term pulmonary function or in incidence of recurrent wheezing following RSV infection were associated with the use of ribavirin. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: Trials of ribavirin for RSV lack sufficient power to provide reliable estimates of the effects. The cumulative results of three small trials show that ribavirin may reduce the duration of mechanical ventilation and may reduce days of hospitalization. In addition, use of ribavirin may be associated with a decrease in the long-term incidence of recurrent wheezing following RSV disease. A large randomized controlled trial of ribavirin for ventilated and other high-risk participants is indicated.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/14651858.cd000181.pub3This paper is marked retracted.

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 312

Metadata

Authors
Ventre, K., & Randolph, A.
Venue
Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews
Published
2007-01-24
Issue
1
Pages
CD000181-CD000181
ISSN
1361-6137 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2119804593
Cited by
312
References
0
Type
reference entry
Language
en
Status
Retracted
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Ribavirin for respiratory syncytial virus infection of the lower respiratory tract in infants and young children. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/14651858.cd000181.pub3
The paper
Ventre, K., & Randolph, A. (2007). Ribavirin for respiratory syncytial virus infection of the lower respiratory tract in infants and young children. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.cd000181.pub3

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.