The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Antibiotics for acute maxillary sinusitis
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Expert opinions vary on the appropriate role of antibiotics for sinusitis, one of the most commonly diagnosed conditions among adults in ambulatory care. OBJECTIVES: We examined whether antibiotics are effective in treating acute sinusitis, and if so, which antibiotic classes are the most effective. SEARCH STRATEGY: We searched the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) (The Cochrane Library, 2007, Issue 3); MEDLINE (1950 to May 2007) and EMBASE (1974 to June 2007). SELECTION CRITERIA: Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing antibiotics with placebo or antibiotics from different classes for acute maxillary sinusitis in adults. We included trials with clinically diagnosed acute sinusitis, whether or not confirmed by radiography or bacterial culture. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: At least two review authors independently screened search results, extracted data and quality assessed trials. Risk ratios (RR) were calculated for differences in the intervention and control groups to see whether or not the treatment was a failure. In meta-analysing the placebo-controlled studies, the data across antibiotic classes were combined. Primary outcomes were the clinical failure rates at 7 to 15 days and 16 to 60 days follow up. MAIN RESULTS: Fifty-seven studies were included in the review; six placebo-controlled studies and 51 studies comparing different classes of antibiotics. Five studies involving 631 participants provided data for comparison of antibiotics to placebo, when clinical failure was defined as a lack of cure or improvement at 7 to 15 days follow up. These studies found a slight statistical difference in favor of antibiotics, compared to placebo, with a pooled RR of 0.66 (95% confidence interval (CI) 0.44 to 0.98). However, the clinical significance of the result is equivocal, also considering that cure or improvement rate was high in both the placebo group (80%) and the antibiotic group (90%). Based on six studies, when clinical failure was defined as a lack of total cure, there was significant difference in favor of antibiotics compared to placebo with a pooled RR of 0.74 (95% CI 0.65 to 0.84) at 7 to 15 days follow up. None of the antibiotic preparations was superior to each other. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: Antibiotics have a small treatment effect in patients with uncomplicated acute sinusitis in a primary care setting with symptoms for more than seven days. However, 80% of participants treated without antibiotics improve within two weeks. Clinicians need to weigh the small benefits of antibiotic treatment against the potential for adverse effects at both the individual and general population level.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Pharmaceutical industry sponsorship and research outcome and quality: systematic review
Lexchin, J., Bero, L. A., Djulbegovic, B., & Clark, O. (2003) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.326.7400.1167 · Cited by 2,147
Scope and Impact of Financial Conflicts of Interest in Biomedical Research: A Systematic Review
Bekelman, J. E., Li, Y., & Gross, C. P. (2003) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.289.4.454 · Cited by 1,816
Computed tomographic study of the common cold
Gwaltney, J. M., Phillips, C. D., Miller, R. D., & Riker, D. K. (1994) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejm199401063300105 · Cited by 668
Puhakka, T., Mäkelä, M. J., Alanen, A., Kallio, T., Korsoff, L., Arstila, P., Leinonen, M., Pulkkinen, M., Suonpää, J., Mertsola, J., et al. (1998) · Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology · doi:10.1016/s0091-6749(98)70127-7 · Cited by 115
Cited by
Atkins, D., Briss, P. A., Eccles, M., Flottorp, S., Guyatt, G. H., Harbour, R. T., Hill, S., Jaeschke, R., Liberati, A., Magrini, N., et al. (2005) · BMC Health Services Research · doi:10.1186/1472-6963-5-25 · Cited by 331
Canadian clinical practice guidelines for acute and chronic rhinosinusitis
Desrosiers, M., Evans, G. A., Keith, P. K., Wright, E. D., Kaplan, A., Bouchard, J., Ciavarella, A., Doyle, P. W., Javer, A. R., Leith, E. S., et al. (2011) · Allergy, Asthma & Clinical Immunology · doi:10.1186/1710-1492-7-2 · Cited by 313
Adjustment of meta-analyses on the basis of quality scores should be abandoned
Herbison, P., Hay-Smith, J., & Gillespie, W. J. (2006) · Journal of Clinical Epidemiology · doi:10.1016/j.jclinepi.2006.03.008 · Cited by 207
THE PENICILLINS: A REVIEW AND UPDATE
Miller, E. L. (2002) · Journal of Midwifery & Women's Health · doi:10.1016/s1526-9523(02)00330-6 · Cited by 147
Errors in search strategies were identified by type and frequency
Sampson, M., & McGowan, J. (2006) · Journal of Clinical Epidemiology · doi:10.1016/j.jclinepi.2006.01.007 · Cited by 142
Metadata
- Authors
- Ahovuo-Saloranta, A., Rautakorpi, U.-M., Borisenko, O. V., Liira, H., Williams Jr, J. W., & Mäkelä, M.
- Venue
- Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews
- Publisher
- John Wiley & Sons, Ltd
- Published
- 2008-04-23
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- CD000243-CD000243
- ISSN
- 1361-6137 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2108271073
- Cited by
- 239
- References
- 4
- Type
- reference entry
- Language
- en
- Status
- Retracted
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Antibiotics for acute maxillary sinusitis. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/14651858.cd000243.pub2
- The paper
- Ahovuo-Saloranta, A., Rautakorpi, U.-M., Borisenko, O. V., Liira, H., Williams Jr, J. W., & Mäkelä, M. (2008). Antibiotics for acute maxillary sinusitis. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.cd000243.pub2
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.