Cited by 315Dermatological diseases and infestationsDermatology and Skin DiseasesParasitic Diseases Research and Treatment

Interventions for treating scabies

Open access
Strong, Mark, Johnstone, Paul·2007·Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Scabies is an intensely itchy parasitic infection of the skin caused by the Sarcoptes scabiei mite. It is a common public health problem with an estimated global prevalence of 300 million cases. Serious adverse effects have been reported for some drugs used to treat scabies. OBJECTIVES: To evaluate topical and systemic drugs for treating scabies. SEARCH STRATEGY: In February 2007, we searched the Cochrane Infectious Diseases Group Specialized Register, CENTRAL (The Cochrane Library 2006, Issue 1), MEDLINE, EMBASE, LILACS, and INDMED. In March 2007, we also searched the grey literature and sources for registered trials. We also checked the reference lists of retrieved studies. SELECTION CRITERIA: Randomized controlled trials of drug treatments for scabies. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Two authors independently assessed trial quality and extracted data. Results were presented as relative risks with 95% confidence intervals and data combined where appropriate. MAIN RESULTS: Twenty small trials involving 2392 people were included. One trial was placebo controlled, 16 compared two or more drug treatments, two compared treatment regimens, and one compared different drug vehicles.Fewer treatment failures occurred by day seven with oral ivermectin in one small trial (55 participants). Topical permethrin appeared more effective than oral ivermectin (85 participants, 1 trial), topical crotamiton (194 participants, 2 trials), and topical lindane (753 participants, 5 trials). Permethrin also appeared more effective in reducing itch persistence than either crotamiton (94 participants, 1 trial) or lindane (490 participants, 2 trials). One small trial did not detect a difference between permethrin (a synthetic pyrethroid) and a natural pyrethrin-based topical treatment (40 participants). No significant difference was detected in the number of treatment failures between crotamiton and lindane (100 participants, 1 trial), lindane and sulfur (68 participants, 1 trial), benzyl benzoate and sulfur (158 participants, 1 trial), and benzyl benzoate and natural synergized pyrethrins (240 participants, 1 trial); all were topical treatments. No trials of malathion were identified. No serious adverse events were reported. A number of trials reported skin reactions in participants randomized to topical treatments. There were occasional reports of headache, abdominal pain, diarrhoea, vomiting, and hypotension. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: Topical permethrin appears to be the most effective treatment for scabies. Ivermectin appears to be an effective oral treatment. More research is needed on the effectiveness of malathion, particularly when compared to permethrin, and on the management of scabies in an institutional setting and at a community level.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/14651858.cd000320.pub2

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Topical permethrin and oral and topical ivermectin have similar efficacy for cure of scabies.

    “Topical permethrin and oral and topical ivermectin have similar efficacy for cure of scabies (1405–1410).”

    From Sexually Transmitted Infections Treatment Guidelines, 2021 (2021) · cites this paper as [1405]

    The Main results and Effectiveness sections say topical permethrin appeared more effective than oral ivermectin, not similarly effective; the oral-ivermectin comparison found more treatment failures with ivermectin. The Effectiveness section says topical ivermectin had only been suggested as effective in uncontrolled studies and that randomized trials were needed, so the review does not establish comparable efficacy for it. (LLM, conf=0.91)

    Checked by a reasoning model — may be wrong.

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 37

  1. to studies included in this review Amer 1992 {published data only} Amer M, el-Gharib I. Permethrin versus crotamiton and lindane in the treatment of scabies. International Journal of Dermatology 1992;31(5):357-8.
  2. Amerio 2003 {published data only} Amerio P, Capizzi R, Milani M. Efficacy and tolerability of natural synergised pyrethrins in a new thermo labile foam formulation in topical treatment of scabies: a prospective, randomised, investigator-blinded, comparative trial vs. permethrin cream. European Journal of Dermatology 2003;13(1):69-71.
  3. Avila-Romay 1991 {published data only} Avila-Romay A, Alvarez-Franco M, Ruiz-Maldonado R. Therapeutic efficacy, secondary effects, and patient acceptability of 10% sulfur in either pork fat or cold cream for the treatment of scabies. Pediatric Dermatology 1991;8(1):64-6.
  4. Bachewar 2009 {published data only} Bachewar N, Thawani V, Mali S, Gharpure K, Shingade V, Dakhale G. Comparison of safety, efficacy, and cost effectiveness of benzyl benzoate, permethrin, and ivermectin in patients of scabies. Indian Journal of Pharmacology 2009; Vol. 41, issue 1:9-14.
  5. Biele M, Campori G, Colombo R, De Giorgio G, Frascione P, Sali R, et al. Efficacy and tolerability of a new synergized pyrethrins thermofobic foam in comparison with benzyl benzoate in the treatment of scabies in convicts: the ISAC study (Studio Della scabbia in ambiente carcerario). Journal of the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology 2006;20(6):717-20.
  6. Brooks 2002 {published data only} Brooks PA, Grace RF. Ivermectin is better than benzyl benzoate for childhood scabies in developing countries. Journal of Paediatrics and Child Health 2002;38(4):401-4.
  7. Chouela 1999 {published data only} Chouela EN, Abeldano AM, Pellerano G, La Forgia M, Papale RM, Garsd A, et al. Equivalent therapeutic efficacy and safety of ivermectin and lindane in the treatment of human scabies. Archives of Dermatology 1999;135(6):651-5.
  8. Glaziou 1993 {published data only} Glaziou P, Cartel JL, Alzieu P, Briot C, Moulia-Pelat JP, Martin PM. Comparison of ivermectin and benzyl benzoate for treatment of scabies. Tropical Medicine and Parasitology 1993;44(4):331-2.
  9. Gulati 1978 {published data only} Gulati PV, Singh KP. A family based study on the treatment of scabies with benzyl benzoate and sulphur ointment. Indian Journal of Dermatology, Venereology and Leprology 1978;44(5):269-73.
  10. Hansen 1986 {published data only} Hansen RC, Remmers E, Menter MA. A controlled comparative trial of permethrin 5 per cent cream and 1 per cent lindane lotion for the treatment of scabies. Clinical Research 1986;34:160.
  11. Ly 2009 {published data only} Ly F, Caumes E, Ndaw CAT, Ndiaye B, Mahé A. Ivermectin versus benzyl benzoate applied once or twice to treat human scabies in Dakar, Senegal: a randomized controlled trial. Bulletin of the World Health Organization 2009;87:424-30.
  12. Macotela-Ruiz 1993 {published data only} Macotela-Ruiz E, Pena-Gonzalez G. The treatment of scabies with oral ivermectin [Tratamiento de la escabiasis con ivermectina por via oral]. Gaceta Medica Mexico 1993;129(3):201-5.
  13. Madan 2001 {published data only} Madan V, Jaskiran K, Gupta U, Gupta DK. Oral ivermectin in scabies patients: a comparison with 1% topical lindane lotion. The Journal of Dermatology 2001;28(9):481-4.
  14. Maggi 1986 {published data only} Maggi A, Subercaseaux B. Scabies treatment with lindane [Tratamiento de la sarna con lindano. Comparacion de esquemas terapeuticos]. Revista Medica de Valparaiso 1986;39(1):11-14.
  15. Nnoruka 2001 {published data only} Nnoruka EN, Agu CE. Successful treatment of scabies with oral ivermectin in Nigeria. Tropical Doctor 2001;31(1):15-8.
  16. Reintjes R, Hoek C, Coyne PE, Addiss DG, Barkwell R, Shields S, et al. Deaths associated with ivermectin for scabies. Lancet 1997;350(9072):215-6.
  17. Buffet M, Dupin N. Current treatments for scabies. Fundamental & Clinical Pharmacology 2003;17(2):217-25.
  18. Chosidow O. Scabies and pediculosis. Lancet 2000;355(9206):819-26.
  19. Coleman CI, Gillespie EL, White CM. Probable topical permethrin-induced neck dystonia. Pharmacotherapy 2005;25(3):448-50.
  20. Cox NH. Permethrin treatment in scabies infestation: importance of the correct formulation. BMJ 2000;320(7226):37-8.
  21. Coyne PE, Addiss DG. Deaths associated with ivermectin for scabies. Lancet 1997;350(9072):215-6.
  22. De Sole G, Remme J, Awadzi K, Accorsi S, Alley ES, Ba O, et al. Adverse reactions a er large-scale treatment of onchocerciasis with ivermectin: combined results from eight community trials. Bulletin of the World Health Organization 1989;67(6):707-19.
  23. Diazgranados JA, Costa JL. Deaths a er ivermectin treatment. Lancet 1997;349(9066):1698.
  24. Downs AM, Harvey I, Kennedy CT. The epidemiology of head lice and scabies in the UK. Epidemiology and Infection 1999;122(3):471-7.
  25. Elgart ML. A risk-benefit assessment of agents used in the treatment of scabies. Drug Safety 1996;14(6):386-93.
  26. Fain A. Epidemiological problems of scabies. International Journal of Dermatology 1978;17(1):20-30.
  27. Green M. Epidemiology of scabies. Epidemiologic Reviews 1989;11:126-50.
  28. Hay 2004 Hay RJ. Scabies -learning from the animals. Journal of the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology 2004;18:129-30.
  29. Mimouni D, Gdalevich M, Mimouni FB, Haviv J, Ashkenazi I. The epidemiologic trends of scabies among Israeli soldiers: a 28-year follow-up. International Journal of Dermatology 1998;37(8):586-7.
  30. Mimouni D, Ankol OE, Davidovitch N, Gdalevich M, Zangvil E, Grotto I. Seasonality trends of scabies in a young adult population: a 20-year follow-up. British Journal of Dermatology 2003;149(1):157-9.
  31. Orkin M, Epstein E, Maibach HI. Treatment of today's scabies and pediculosis. Journal of the American Medical Association 1976;236(10):1136-9.
  32. Pacque M, Munoz B, Greene BM, White AT, Dukuly Z, Taylor HR. Safety of and compliance with community-based ivermectin therapy. Lancet 1990;335(8702):1377-80.
  33. Petros S. Malathion poisoning. Tropical Doctor 1990;20(2):71. Interventions for treating scabies (Review) Copyright © 2019 The Cochrane Collaboration. Published by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. References to other published versions of this review Walker 1997
  34. Walker 1999a Walker GJA, Johnstone PW. Interventions for treating scabies. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 1999, Issue 1. [DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD000320] · DOI
  35. Walker 1999b Walker GJA, Johnstone PW. Interventions for treating scabies. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 1999, Issue 3. [DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD000320] · DOI
  36. Walker GJA, Johnstone PW. Interventions for treating scabies. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2000, Issue 3. [DOI: 10.1002/14651858. · DOI
  37. C H A R A C T E R I S T I C S O F S T U D I E S Characteristics of included studies [ordered by study ID] Methods Design: randomized controlled trial Generation of allocation sequence: "according to code" Allocation concealment: unclear Blinding: unclear Inclusion of randomized participants in the analysis: 100% Participants Number: 150 enrolled (all ages; sex not stated) Inclusion criteria: clinically diagnosed and microbiologically confirmed scabies Exclusion criteria: significant impetiginization Amer 1992 Interventions for treating scabies (Review) Copyright © 2019 The Cochrane Collaboration. Published by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Strong, M., & Johnstone, P.
Affiliations
  • University of Sheffield (GB)
  • Blenheim House; NHS Yorkshire and the Humber; Duncombe Street Leeds UK LS1 4PL
Venue
Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2007-07-18
Volume
2019
Issue
5
Pages
CD000320-CD000320
ISSN
  • 1361-6137 (ISSN-L)
  • 1465-1858
OpenAlex
W1489375531
Cited by
315
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 12 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 16 · 2020: 13 · 2019: 14 · 2018: 23 · 2017: 19 · 2016: 22 · 2015: 13 · 2014: 19 · 2013: 18 · 2012: 21
FWCI
1.95
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › Dermatological diseases and infestations
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Dermatology › Dermatology and Skin Diseases
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › Parasitic Diseases Research and Treatment
Keywords
scabies, Sarcoptes scabiei, ivermectin, permethrin, crotamiton, lindane, sulfur, benzyl benzoate, pyrethroid insecticides, topical treatment, systemic therapy, treatment failure, pruritus, adverse drug reactions, drug efficacy comparison, malathion
MeSH terms
Adult, Hexachlorocyclohexane, Benzoates, Child, Humans, Insecticides, Ivermectin, Pyrethrins, Scabies, Sulfur, Toluidines

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review