Cited by 282Dysphagia Assessment and ManagementStroke Rehabilitation and RecoveryClinical Nutrition and Gastroenterology

Interventions for dysphagia and nutritional support in acute and subacute stroke

Chamila M. Geeganage, J. Beavan, Sharon Ellender, Philip M. Bath·2012·Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Abstract

Background Dysphagia (swallowing problems) are common after stroke and can cause chest infection and malnutrition. Dysphagic, and malnourished, stroke patients have a poorer outcome. Objectives To assess the effectiveness of interventions for the treatment of dysphagia (swallowing therapy), and nutritional and fluid supplementation, in patients with acute and subacute (within six months from onset) stroke. Search methods We searched the Cochrane Stroke Group Trials Register (February 2012), MEDLINE (1966 to July 2011), EMBASE (1980 to July 2011), CINAHL (1982 to July 2011) and Conference Proceedings Citation Index- Science (CPCI-S) (1990 to July 2011). We also searched the reference lists of relevant trials and review articles, searched Current Controlled Trials and contacted researchers (July 2011). For the previous version of this review we contacted the Royal College of Speech and Language Therapists and equipment manufacturers. Selection criteria Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) in dysphagic stroke patients, and nutritional supplementation in all stroke patients, where the stroke occurred within six months of enrolment. Data collection and analysis Two review authors independently applied the inclusion criteria, assessed trial quality, and extracted data, and resolved any disagreements through discussion with a third review author. We used random-effects models to calculate odds ratios (OR), 95% confidence intervals (95% CI), and mean differences (MD). The primary outc…

Integrity signals

Registry

OpenAlex · 10.1002/14651858.cd000323.pub2

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Enteral feeding strategies may be needed when aspiration risk is high in acute stroke.

    “Early screening and structured dysphagia management improve outcomes (Arnold et al., 2016; Martino et al., 2005), and enteral feeding strategies may be needed when aspiration risk is high (Duncan et al., 2020; Geeganage et al., 2012).”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Authors
Geeganage, C. M., Beavan, J., Ellender, S., & Bath, P. M.
Affiliations
  • University of Colombo (LK)
  • Royal Derby Hospital (GB)
  • University of Nottingham (GB)
Venue
Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2012-10-17
Volume
10
Pages
CD000323-CD000323
ISSN
  • 1361-6137 (ISSN-L)
  • 1465-1858
OpenAlex
W2114246762
Cited by
282
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 13 · 2023: 16 · 2022: 26 · 2021: 23 · 2020: 25 · 2019: 31 · 2018: 30 · 2017: 20 · 2016: 26 · 2015: 18 · 2014: 25 · 2013: 20
FWCI
4.41
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Speech and Hearing › Dysphagia Assessment and Management
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Rehabilitation › Stroke Rehabilitation and Recovery
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Clinical Nutrition and Gastroenterology
Keywords
dysphagia, stroke, swallowing therapy, nutritional support, fluid replacement, acupuncture, neuromuscular electrical stimulation, pharyngeal electrical stimulation, transcranial direct current stimulation, transcranial magnetic stimulation, behavioral interventions, malnutrition, functional outcome, case fatality, dependency, chest infection, rehabilitation therapy
MeSH terms
Stroke Rehabilitation, Acute Disease, Deglutition, Deglutition Disorders, Humans, Physical Stimulation, Acupuncture Therapy, Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic, Nutritional Support, Stroke

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review