Cited by 66Medical Practices and RehabilitationStroke Rehabilitation and RecoveryHealth Education and Validation

The Culturally Adapted Italian Version of the Barthel Index (IcaBI): Assessment of Structural Validity, Inter-Rater Reliability and Responsiveness to Clinically Relevant Improvements in Patients Admitted to Inpatient Rehabilitation Centers

Open access
Castiglia, SF·2017·Functional Neurology

Abstract

The Barthel Index (BI) is widely used to determine eligibility criteria for inpatient rehabilitation and to monitor patients' recovery, irrespective of the illnesses that affect them. The culturally adapted Italian version of the Barthel Index (IcaBI) was recently validated. This paper reports the structural validity and inter-rater reliability of the IcaBI and its responsiveness to the results of inpatient rehabilitation. The IcaBI was administered to a cohort of 264 patients hospitalized in two rehabilitation centers in Rome, Italy. Factor analysis using principal component analysis revealed a monofactorial structure for neurological patients and, after removal of item 1 "feeding", also for orthopedic patients. Substantial to optimal inter-rater reliability was found (0.74 > intraclass correlation coefficient < 0.96). The IcaBI was found to be accurate (area under the curve= 0.72) with a minimal clinically important change score of 35 points. This work confirms that IcaBI is a useful tool for measuring disability in health and social care settings along the continuum of care. Further studies are needed to assess its criterion validity, interpretability and responsiveness in other specific disease conditions.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.11138/fneur/2017.32.4.221

Cites

35 of 35 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The mean difference in functional independence (37.8 points) was higher than MCID for inpatient rehabilitation for BI (35 points).

    “The mean difference in functional independence (37.8 points) was higher than minimal clinically important differences (MCID) for inpatient rehabilitation for BI (35 points) [59].”

    From Physical Activity, Psychological and Functional Outcomes in Non-Ambulatory Stroke Patients during Rehabilitation—A Pilot Study (2022) · cites this paper as [59]

    The Responsiveness section reports a 35-point MCIC for the culturally adapted Italian Barthel Index in rehabilitation inpatients, supporting the cited threshold. It reports a mean change of 36.8 points, not 37.8; the Discussion (p. 225) reiterates the 35-point threshold. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 36 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Nunnally JC (1994). Psychometric theory, 3d edition. McGraw- Hill, New York.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Castiglia, S.
Venue
Functional Neurology
Publisher
Edikta s.r.l.
Published
2017
Volume
32
Issue
4
Pages
221
ISSN
  • 0393-5264 (ISSN-L)
  • 1971-3274
OpenAlex
W2783862514
Cited by
66
References
36
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 6
FWCI
16.18
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Functional Neurology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • IRIS Research product catalog (Sapienza University of Rome) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation › Medical Practices and Rehabilitation
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Rehabilitation › Stroke Rehabilitation and Recovery
  • Social Sciences › Education › Health Education and Validation
Keywords
Barthel Index, Italian adaptation, functional disability assessment, inpatient rehabilitation, inter-rater reliability, structural validity, responsiveness, minimal clinically important change, neurological patients, orthopedic patients
MeSH terms
Adult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Culture, Disability Evaluation, Female, Humans, Inpatients, Italy, Male, Middle Aged, Movement Disorders, Surveys and Questionnaires, Rehabilitation Centers, Severity of Illness Index, Translating, Reproducibility of Results, Outcome Assessment, Health Care, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review